Surprised to see this in our March 20th, 2017 Agenda Packet but am glad I did.
Perhaps there may be those concerned about the “lack of respect” Pete Kampa and his group have shown for the legally entitled MERCED RIVER WATER users of the LAKE DON PEDRO OWNERS ASSOCIATION (LDPOA) SUBDIVISION, who due to that property ownership, are also MANDATORY CUSTOMERS of the THE LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (LDPCSD) which is an INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICT.
Sorry, but after reading it for a third time I am afraid it all smells like the same type of garbage Pete Kampa has been pushing at the Lake Don Pedro CSD since his board orchestrated behind the scene appoint to that GM position without any semblance of a traditional employment background check. I had hoped maybe the CSDA had been hoodwinked by an imposter, someone who’s actual character was not known to their association but now must wonder if KAMPA is just merely a glinting reflection of what the CSDA truly represents?
We all know why a typical employment process was not required, right? psst- but just for new viewers let’s hit it again:
KNEW WHAT THEY BROUGHT IN
Because the board already knew exactly what they were getting with “ringer” PETE KAMPA – a PRO OUTSIDE MIDPOU EXPANSION ADVOCATE with experience, NOT ONLY WITH THE LAKE DON PEDRO CSD, but MOST IMPORTANTLY – in obtaining GRANT MONEY with which to develop a MUCH LARGER ALTERNATE SOURCE OF WATER to fuel a GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM TO REPLACE MERCED RIVER WATER that ILLEGALLY LEAVES the WATER LICENSE PERMITTED PLACE OF USE.
HERE’S THE MONEY – NOW GET MORE GROUNDWATER WELLS WITH GRANTS
That NO BACKGROUND CHECK process was also done to expedite the timeline for KAMPA to immediately begin accessing the over $1 million dollars LDPCSD had saved after near bankruptcy four years earlier. The drought emergency “short-cut rules” wouldn’t last forever. KAMPA used that money to leverage grant money allocations so as to construct more groundwater wells (greater alternate source of water) to begin further OUTSIDE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE water service to properties which are prohibited MERCED RIVER WATER under MID’s water license 11395. All under the guise of helping existing water customers for whom those grants were entitled to assist during the drought.
GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION or GROUNDWATER CIRCUMVENTION?
This GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM is nothing more than a way to circumvent the MERCED RIVER WATER RESTRICTIONS IN THE WATER LICENSE while simultaneously, FORCING THE ENTITLED MERCED RIVER WATER using customers of the LDPOA SUBDIVISION TO PAY FOR A SPECIAL BENEFIT WATER SERVICE TO LAND DEVELOPERS OUTSIDE THE MIDPOU FOR WHOM THE LDPCSD HAS NO LEGAL DUTY OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO SERVICE WATER IN THE FIRST PLACE! (Does the use of capitalized letters and color font help emphasize? lol)
CSDA ADVISED OF MISLEADING MAPS ON LDPCSD WEBSITE
Regarding CSDA mapping project on the LDPCSD website. When I first observed the maps Kampa had posted on our LDPCSD website (what the CSDA was posting per KAMPA information) I emailed the CSDA in July of 2016 explaining some district history, our water license restrictions, and how those maps were not current and correct. Even provided copies of three maps as well. What was CSDA’s response in correcting the matter? Absolutely nothing. Only response I recall was an acknowledgement of receipt of my communications, which I had to request on the second email to them just to make sure the information was received!
Surprising? No really when you consider Peter Kampa sure appears to be one of their own. I believe KAMPA was actually going to be President of the CSDA one year if he had not been fired from the employment position that qualified him for that position. I believe he has been a CSDA Board Member and even an instructor at various educational opportunities offered by the CSDA. KAMPA admits to being a government “insider” on important water use issues and has no doubt made (and trained) many influential authorities and regulators. Certainly Kampa has friends in high places.
Frankly, if Pete Kampa represents the caliber of individual CSDA believes a good example of their efforts, well I must now also doubt the motives and goals of the CSDA. Let’s see…..CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION? If there are NO SPECIAL DISTRICTS in the future (as has apparently been suggested in meetings discussed in the letter), that means NO CSDA right? How could there be an association of special districts in California if there were no more special districts? (yeah, that redundancy again)
Could it be the CSDA (just like KAMPA) is far more concerned with their own special business interests rather than their advertised lofty goals of assisting communities with obtaining necessary and/or desired services? Humm
Not sure how to word this comment, but something to the effect of:
A sad realization it is that the individuals, entities, even public agencies we once essentially believed to be honest and dedicated to the assistance of regular citizens, ARE IN REALITY NOT what we were educated, trained, and encouraged to trust and support.
THE LDPCSD SPECIAL INDEPENDENT DISTRICT. Where does the deceit stop? Who has the power and authority to correct obvious and intentional wrongs against innocents who have done nothing wrong with the exception of purchasing property with which to build a dream? Why should honest hard work towards that dream be transformed into a working nightmare due to the greed and selfishness of others demanding something clearly not legally theirs to demand?
HEY! I DID NOT MAKE MERCED RIVER WATER DIVERSION AND USE REGULATIONS – BUT I CAN READ, AND SO CAN PETE KAMPA AND THE CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION MEMBERS WHO APPARENTLY SUPPORT WHAT KAMPA HAS DONE, IS DOING, AND WILL DO TO OUR LDPCSD FOR THIRD PARTY BENEFIT.
Why are unethical practices rewarded through the apparent apathy of its victims to take action? Is is due to lost hope for long overdue change? Recognition that “standing up for your rights” also “makes you a larger target”? I don’t care for being forced to subsidize private special benefit water service for land developers where the LDPCSD has no legal duty to do so, but if that is what is going to continue such needs to be documented as A DISTRICT POLICY and made public in all property purchases, transfers, disclosures, agreements and official recordings.
There needs to be a clear “meeting of the minds” between the seller and buyer. An agreement which would demonstrate a property purchaser knowingly assumed the increasing: UNKNOWN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES for that water service benefiting an UNKNOWN NUMBER OF DEVELOPMENTS, for an UNKNOWN PERIOD OF TIME.
Yup, after reading that CSDA letter a tune started bouncing around my skull but I don’t have the skill to produce the music – so here are some lyrics.
They talk about cooperation and dialog
And working together as a team
Continually use the word community
All just part of their scheme.
–
To separate us from our money
Funding for their devious plots
Go right ahead – speak up at meetings
Pay for it with a stomach in knots.
–
Legitimate questions go unanswered
A special benefit direction quite clear
So similar to enemies all over the globe
But it is our local conspirators we should fear.
My best to you and yours, Lew
No need to comment on the highlighted material, but check it out. Does the CSDA know what is happening at the LAKE DON PEDRO CSD?
the CSDA either.