Monthly Archives October 2017

KAMPA MISREPRESENTS TRUTH AGAIN

 

KAMPA MISREPRESENTING TRUTH AGAIN?  Guess it sounds better than writing “Sneaky Pete Kampa” is a compulsive liar who simply refuses to stop or is powerless to do so.   Either way, trusting Kampa doesn’t make much sense considering his documented background of continued deception and special interest motivation.  Could he be representing the accepted norm in this state’s water industry?  God help the State of California and all its water dependent citizens if PETE KAMPA is an example of the “professionals”in charge of this state’s water issues.

Was “Effective Exploitation of Disadvantaged California Communities – 101” a class he instructed at the CSDA  (CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION)?  Does Sneaky Pete Kampa truly represent CSDAs commitment to excellence?    Excellence to what, public deception and special interest high dollar catering?

Why does the LAKE DON PEDRO CSD Board of Directors continue to support Kampa’s obvious untruths?

What does that indicate?

There was little question about the character of outside Place of Use commercial cattle rancher Emery Ross or Danny Johnson who repeatedly voiced support for the plan of  using government grants to expand the special benefit groundwater substitution process for outside land developers wanting subdivision water.   I had sincerely hoped the other three directors might have eventually recognized the disingenuous path our district was on and would have courageously stood up for the three thousand plus property owners of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision and said “NO MORE!”  However, if this latest and continued ABSOLUTE LIE ABOUT THE POU doesn’t do it, perhaps nothing will.   Maybe they are just afraid of making decisions on their own without a character like Kampa to lead them like sheeple?  Don’t they realize their names and reputations are also tangled up with such dishonesty?

Who knows?  But anything would be better than permitting a dishonest special interest motivated character like Pete Kampa to continue the leadership of this district.  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE NOT LEADING – THEY ARE FOLLOWING and PETE KAMPA is obviously dedicated to selling the  newly developed “EMERGENCY DROUGHT GROUNDWATER” [THE BIG LIE]  to his land developer buddies he worked with 20 years ago to decrease their development costs, increase their profit margins while simultaneously INCREASING THE COST of furnishing water to the legal MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS of the Lake Don Pedro Subdivision.  Looks more like a video documentary everyday.

My best to you and yours, Lew –

however, Sneaky Pete Kampa and his bunch of lying cheats can kiss my exhausted ass!     🙂

 

Categories: Uncategorized.

PRE-MEETING MESSAGE FOR MONDAY FROM WES BARTON (I found a new ink cartridge!- much easier to read scans now.)

 

UNFORTUNATELY MONDAY’S LDPCSD MEETING PAPERWORK EXCEEDED THE FILE SIZE PERMITTED (EXPECT THIS FOR NOW ON – lol) SO I WAS UNABLE TO POST THE MEETING AGENDA PACKET CONTAINING THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER ABOARD VIOLATION NOTICE SENT TO GM PETE KAMPA THAT ACCOMPANIED MR. BARTON’S OPEN LETTER TO CUSTOMERS.

I HAVE CHECKED  A COUPLE OF TIMES ON THE LDPCSD WEBSITE BUT CANNOT ACCESS THE MEETING AGENDA PACKET THERE EITHER.

VERY STRANGE – SO I DECIDED I MIGHT AS WELL TAKE SOME TIME TO SCAN THE INDIVIDUAL VIOLATION NOTICE PAGES SENT TO GM KAMPA BY THE STATE WATER BOARD SO THE BELOW PRE-MEETING MESSAGE BY WES BARTON (REFERRING TO THIS VIOLATION NOTICE) MIGHT MAKE A BIT MORE SENSE.  

sorry!  RUNNING OUT OF INK AGAIN.  (STILL EASIER TO READ THAN THE FINANCIAL ANSWERS TO THE ENGINEER’S QUESTIONS REGARDING KAMPA’S MAPPING PROJECT COSTS ON PAGES 45 & 46 OF THE AGENDA PACKET!  lol)

See you at the meeting!  Lew

2240hrs UPDATE— GOOD NEWS….FOUND A NEW BLACK INK CARTRIDGE!

******************************************

  

 

 

 

LAST LEW NOTE:  FOR THOSE OF YOU ABLE TO DOWNLOAD OR VIEW THIS VIOLATION NOTICE IN THE AGENDA PACKET ON THE LDPCSD WEBSITE, PLEASE NOTICE THAT PETE KAMPA DID NOT PLACE THE STATE WATER BOARD PREPARED MAP (ABOVE) WITH THE OTHER PAGES OF THAT VIOLATION NOTICE, BUT RATHER, PLACED THAT STATE MAP BETWEEN TWO PAGES OF HIS PROPOSED MAPPING PROJECT INFORMATION WHICH UNDOUBTEDLY SOME MISTAKENLY BELIEVED WAS THE MAPPING RESULT BEING DISCUSSED.  TYPICAL KAMPA.  I ALSO BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME MISTAKES ON THE ABOVE MAP AND HAVE REPORTED SUCH TO THE SWRCB.

***********************************************************************

Attached is Board Package (of paper) for the meeting tomorrow at 1 pm.  Hope you gather your neighbors and

Have a “tail gate” party at the CSD, watch the action at 1 pm.         Pre-meeting comments by Wes:

Agenda item 5.a.      …….Notice of Violation issued by State Water Resources Control Board, Div Wtr Rights……

[This violation has nothing to do with “local state high risk audit” and 2 accounting/audit claims currently in process]

GM Kampa (GM) obviously is answering by spending more consulting money and “doubling down” on expanding

Water use outside of the Districts legal obligation under the State/MID water license/agreements.  Board also has

A Policy restricting “new outside of place” water expansion.  Intent obviously of the grants leading to the drilling

Of wells was for this communities emergency needs not GM and “outside ‘fat cats’” special interest.   GM left

Public employment from McCloud, CA, Sonora, CA, (and probably Los Osos, CA) under  an unfavorable “cloud”

Related to “wheeling and dealing” with the communities’ resources.  [AS documented in said cities news media.]

It appears that GM is following his “normal” pattern possibly hand-in-hand with special interest again attempting

To “rape” LDP community.     Before allowing this “agenda item”, please consider:

1)      This development has 16-1700 lots available to development (over ½) within the original development.

2)      CSD documents show:    year 2005 actual sales volume 220700 ccf (CSD billing units)

                                                 Year 2013 actual sales volume 190600 ccf  (before declared drought: used as base by CA)

                                                 Year 2018 plan     sales volume 132700 ccf

3)      GM recently presented to the Board:   current district population is 2700; 2060 is estimated to be 2910

(will grow 210 people, 109 households next 40 years.  Next to no growth expected.)

4)      As part of “emergency water” study in 2015 by Binkley Engineers (CSD’s life time engineers), determined

First well drilled in 1992 will currently produce at 70 gallons per minutes(gpm); halved for limiting risk to

35gpm.  This translates into 2048 ccf per month [4.7 acre feet(AF)] water production (probably much more).

5)      Using 9 months, 2017 plus 3 months, 2016 current outside place of use volume is 565ccf  per mo

[1.3 AF per mo]           Highest volume month was 1033ccf [2.4 AF].    Decidedly within capacity of original well.

Conclusion:  Per GM, nearly no growth next 40 years and maximum demand (use)  within capacity of original

Well’s capacity to supply.      WHY IN THE “HELL’ DO WE NEED TO INVOLVE THE CURRENT  EMERGENCY WELLS IN A

GM/SPECIAL INTEREST SCHEME ?        Continue to reserve the emergency well water for its intended purpose.

SWRCB plan to include: a)No new “out of place(OPU)” users nor new activities of old users.  Total well use for

                                                   OPU not to exceed original well current capacity.

                                               b)Digitizing plan for required maps only; no ongoing activity: periodic upgrade.  Cost

                                                   not known apx $20-45k plan.   (New fake maps probably would be fraud!)

                                               c)Currently, CSD pays office and CPA in excess of $145k per year for this little business;

                                                   can sure as hell keep up with our limited OPU activities.

Second comment, as to the attempt of this Board/GM to reject the current policy of no new “out of place” users,

Came in the first month (apx) of using the new wells for emergency water for this CSD’s consumption.  The Board

Again voted the new wells to be Emergency Only for the contractual, legal customers of CSD, excluding any new

“out of place use possibilities.

CSD can meet the “violation” requirements within CSD current capacity; DON’T NEED MORE PAGES (& B S), WASTED

MONEY, JOBS FOR CONSULTANTS & OTHER CHRONIES THAT THIS COMMUNITY/CSD HAS PUT UP WITH  FOR OVER

THREE YEARS.                                                                       JUST STOP IT NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!

5. b.c.d.e will discuss together for the intent is to focus on OPU, hire consultants and other cronies, and scatter

Red herrings to cover inability to lead, manage, plan and carryout responsibility of Board (and GM).  Spending CSD

Money and plan for increases is the “icing on the cake”.  Changes to budget include:

a)      Not buying one new truck; interpret limit employees and required work.  Hire more outsiders.

b)      Reduce main replace from 60k feet to 40k because of many leaks; interpret continuing leaks with limited

Employees (above) and hire more outsiders.

c)       Defer connection fee study $15k.  Head off fights with the RE people as related to availability fees and

Raise the $53/monthly fee that water users pay monthly and the vacant lot cost.  Continue to spend

Down any cash remaining after depleting $1.6 million reserves from increasing overall rates by 100 %

5 years ago.  (Watch them, probably can eliminate the 3 acre rule on vacant lots.)

d)      Barge plans, rebuilt in 2010-11 @$45k; rebuilt in 2014-16@$135k; rebuild plan in 2017-18 @$52k for

Twin lakes and some unknown by me amount for KJ engineers.   (CSD received $60.9k grant revenue

Supposedly related to Barge but last year CPA/auditor didn’t define (I don’t know?).

Other CSD Board (and GM) comments concerning budget for the new year:

1)      Hiring for an operations mgr who reports to GM and has operations super reporting to him.  Operations

Supervisor will have 1 employee reporting to him.  YES, RIGHT  1 BOSS w/1 SUBORDINATE w/1 SUBORDINATE

With 1 WORKER.       Office similar, 1 boss w/1boss w/1 pt worker.  This is only matched by the Board giving the

GM the power to select vendors, what is bought at what price, receive and sign checks.  CSD just rehired the

Same In-house CPA/Auditor.    They claim they see no financial control issue with this scenario.  (We should,

Very soon, know about recent acctg/audits.)   Current acctg/office staff pay budget is $145k; operations

        Staff budget @$183k, auditor $8.8k.     Have no idea what the 3rd party maintenance and repair, capital

       Projects, etc. will cost in the end.  (Remember CSD organization above boss over boss over boss + 1 worker;

       3rd month of the year and each month major to significant changes in plan;  but I’m sure it will be many

       Hundreds of thousands of dollars.)  Additionally, last two years we have had “emergency projects”

       Guided by GM, rubber stamped by board that will run $2 to2.5 million dollars net of Grants (maybe)

       $1.3million.  (Grant income includes over $300k from USDA, not received though GM claimed originally

       In January 2017 that it was around the corner.  It appears that maybe USDA is as confused as I am when I

       Listen to this Board (and GM) tell me how good it is going to be.  My estimate of 3 wells with arsenic and

       17 acres of grazing land will require $700k from CSD’s reserves if all grants are paid.

Ps  sorry for grammer, etc, out of time to clean-up; going to the saloon for dinner with wife and kids

Categories: Uncategorized.

TARA’S TUNE (w/post video update)

 

What can I say? Those of you who have lost beloved non-human companions (the description “pet” just doesn’t come close to describing such relationships) know the sort of pain I attempted to express in my newly awakened method. (Could have made a full length feature out of all the photos and video, but I suspicion the 2+ minutes will suffice to make the point.) I’ve wanted to write about this for a while but it’s just still a bit raw. Perhaps such situations will always remain so. It was a very long goodbye.

Well, that’s it for now. Later, Lew (Liz crashed a while ago…..lol)

Hey, hope you accepted the above the way it was intended.  Here are a couple of after thoughts about a very emotional subject for some of us.

You know, I truly believe our long term canine companions eventually become service dogs without any formal training associated with traditional “service dogs (animals)”.   Sure I could teach her to pickup things I drop, but that would be more like a full time job.  Her penchant seems to be for “memory jogging” and schedule assistance” – lol.    Seriously, why do I believe this?  It’s called routine.  Our “non human companions” are (and not just canines – any conditioned animal) very discerning and attentive about their structured environment (aren’t we all?).   When certain things happen, at certain times, for particular reasons a series of learned/programmed responses are presented to us as a result.    I casually pick up my sunglasses, Liz response:  “Oh boy!  We’re going outside! Where’s my ball?”; tune to a particular program on the television response: recognizes the normal routine and she doesn’t interrupt – until the commercial.  This can be a problem when we have conflicting ideas of what needs to be accomplished during commercials.

Then there’s all those environmental “clues” of situational awareness that we as humans are often oblivious to due to our limited sensory acuity.  I read a dog training book once that stated the sense of smell for canines can be anywhere between 10,000 to 100,000 times greater than ours, which would obviously explain why Liz will suddenly wake from sound sleep, “soft woof notice” something is amiss and instantly stick that nose straight up in the air move her head from side to side to identify the scent direction, then start barking and DEMAND to be let outside.

I have unfortunately, as many of you may have likely done in the past as well, inappropriately chastised my canine companions for doing what they are instinctively meant to do – alert that there is potential danger to her “family/flock”.   I’ve noticed with Liz that if I praise her for “alerting me” (about something I often have no idea what it might be) she stops barking because her job was completed to her satisfaction apparently because I ACKNOWLEDGED HER EFFORTS.  Of course this doesn’t work all the time especially with more threatening (or exciting) situations where she “takes a stand” (cornered Rattlesnake, Raccoon, etc.) and refuses to obey (not good, but understandable) which frequently requires a  “field trip” on my part to the location to assess, correct/ameliorate and dismiss her from further duty – but always with well earned praise.

Heck, even poor old Tara towards the end of that dreaded disease and relegated to her homemade mobile “care bed” in the great room, hoarsely (and weakly) managed to bark that something was wrong – waking  us from sleep one night.  Yup – bar-b-que malfunction with a resulting small fire.  Out of the ordinary = sound the alarm (with the best the poor girl could muster – almost a whispered ghost of a life-tired bark.  Crap.  There go the water works again.

Though nothing to do with the above example, when I think of the mistakes I have made with prior companions because of MY FAILURE TO APPRECIATE WHAT THEY KNEW AT THE TIME, it breaks my heart knowing they were only trying to “educate me” as to what they were smelling, seeing, and/or doing due to my incorrect concept of “proper training”, ie, focusing on just obeying commands while remaining ignorant as to the actual nature and circumstances of the incident giving rise to the companion’s disobedience.  A big mistake by the one who is supposed to be in charge.  (So your dog bolts out of the house and chases a cat and will not obey commands to stop and come back.  You call and call, finally the dog returns (generally huffing and puffing and exhausted from the chase) – but if you scold it for running after the cat in the first place (totally forgotten by now in all the excitement) – you are accidentally punishing them for (in their eyes) returning when you called.  See what I mean?   (DOG: “Geez, it was more fun chasing the cat.  I heard the command, eventually obeyed and returned and what do I get as a reward? – Yelled at for returning when that old bastard called me!”)

[Can you imagine punishing a canine in a “disabled canine wheeled cart” for chasing a cat up the cul-de-sac?  I didn’t have the heart – and was astonished with the success of the apparatus.  Scared the heck out of me too —  way to fast on her first “wheeling” lesson!   But you must understand, that cat had been coming over the fence and nonchalantly walking around TARA’S COMPOUND leaving “territorial markers” everywhere because it knew Tara was immobile and could only bark from a stationary position.  Then one day…….it was worth every penny it cost to see Tara wheeling up the street in “semi-hot pursuit”.   (OF COURSE THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY TARA COULD HAVE CAUGHT THE CAT, NOR WOULD I HAVE PERMITTED SUCH, but there was an extra biscuit for my Canine Cart Tara!  And you know?….It did reduce the amount of feline excursions into Tara’s domain.  lol]

 

We are all animals and learn from our mistakes.

Yes it is difficult losing a beloved companion and obtaining another CERTAINLY DOES NOT REPLACE that love for your former best friend but I believe it does permit a healing of sorts by providing another environment and encouraging a similar type of love, caring, and devotion for another animal.    And because we do generally outlive our companions, if our hearts remain open for that (likely) inevitable loss once again, we can enhance that new growing relationship with what we have learned in the past from our other wonderful non human partners.  Of course, it permits committing some of the same mistakes again also.  Case in point:  two morning biscuits are now the “norm” because of innovative successful “canine pleadings” for an extra one every once in a while.  LOL

Liz a good dog and there will be “give and takes” in every relationship.  I’ve spent too much time indoors lately but she has been extremely tolerant and understanding.   (Here’s a humorous observation –  when creating the monthly meeting videos and she hears a particular GM’s voice over the computer speakers going on and on about how for just a little more money such and such can be done….. she gets a look like “great, another week of this Krapa”.)    She’s very intuitive also.

Yup.  Need to get outside today, (even though extremely smoky again) I think Liz has a Possum carcass she’d like us both to roll around on for a while– evidently, her 100,000 times keener sense of smell has picked up on something we just must acquire and wear on our bodies.  Maybe to the next LDPCSD meeting?   lol

 

My best to you and yours, Lew

 

Categories: Uncategorized.

PLAYING MR WECs

 

PLAYING MR WECs ?   Merced River Water Entitled CustomerS – of course!

What can I say?  I am still playing around with this editing software and despite the fact much of this antiquated technology was only recently “discovered” (a little late in life to boot)  – so what?  It has still opened another method of expression to augment traditional blah blah blah.   Hey!  I know!   MMM productions? MUSICAL MONTHLY MEETINGS?   Perhaps like a twisted opera?  Designate particular musical instruments (or tunes) to the individual characters of the meeting and then ….  lol   (The “Fargo” series did that, remember?)

DISCLAIMER  Yes.  The sheep could be considered as representing  MR WECs    in some respects, yet in all fairness, how can Lake Don Pedro subdivision property owners be considered apathetic victim “sheeple” if they are not truly cognizant of the issues affecting the situation and them personally?  Yup, situational awareness – a big point in most “confidence crimes” where the victims, to their own detriment, rely on misrepresented information and/or activities furnished by perpetrators of the con game to gain the victim’s trust so as to inevitably “liberate” something of value from the victim “mark”.

“Geez, a perfect victim!” says the blood swollen fat assed mosquito struggling to take flight from your neck due to the added weight of its recently acquired warm liquid meal.

“Bloodsucker Heavy, this is the tower – are you in need of assistance?”

Yup, unaware victims – that sort of crap can go on for ….. that’s right, case in point, for decades.  Rather like embezzlement where only a little of something is taken at a time, but it occurs multiple times over a long period.   The smaller losses do not draw attention and detection as a “con”.

Now multiply the above potential “innocent ignorance” by variables such as special interest motivation, intentional concealment of fact, misrepresentation, disinformation, etc by a local government agency for an even better defense of   MR WECs  not being unjustly labeled a “sheeple”.

Still, I like the sound effects.

Anyway, hope you find something entertaining (or enlightening) about this “Play As You” learn exercise.   Isn’t that the truth?  We pay as we learn, eh?

 

My best to you and yours, Lew

Categories: Uncategorized.