Come-on, seriously, who won the bet as to how long I could actually keep my big fat blogging mouth via fingers, still? Well, at least better than under a few hours or something, because although getting a little calmer about this incident, unanswered questions have been nagging the heck out of me since October 20th 2024.
SO I’m going to qualify some of my previous sleep deprived rants about what happened with a reluctant (albeit perhaps poor illustration, but trust it makes the point) recognition that I could PERHAPS, be looking at this only from THIS PARTICULAR VICTIM’S PERSPECTIVE and not giving enough credence to the possibility that a series of failures, errors, negligence, (and in this case perhaps even including malice by other actors outside the Sheriff’s Office), etc., were all just coincidentally aligned and combined which created an extremely dangerous and potentially fatal incident with the Mariposa Co Sheriff’s Deputies that they (the MCSO) never intended.
(Thanks Rich – and I agree whole heartily – BUT to an EXTREMELY LIMITED point.)
<regarding the BELOW IN BLUE>
Here’s my (I admit) somewhat confusing analogy to a mitigating factor in my “off the cuff reaction” to what I contend was a violation of my rights to privacy under the US Constitution. Essentially I believe it comes down to; what were the deputies actually thinking they were doing at the moment the gate chain/lock were cut and they entered my home compound? And, how did they come to acquire that perception of what they were doing and why? Basically, what information had been previously furnished from both 1) the MCSO and 2) the previous reporting party/parties actually requesting this highly suspicious COMMUNITY CARE DOCTRINE based “Wellness Check” to see if I needed some assistance? (Which does permit a warrant less entry and search for any injured, incapacitated, or deceased individuals, etc., upon reasonable exigent circumstances leading them to believe such situation existed at my home and surroundings on October 4th.)
So a tool is borrowed to be used for a clear and particular intended purpose yet was subsequently abused and misused – not only contrary to the operating instructions (which damaged the tool) but also for surreptitious malicious work which harmed innocent people.
NOTE: The tool, ironically, was specifically envisioned, designed and constructed to reliably serve and protect innocent people and is constantly upgraded on work experience. Again per operating instructions.
Upon discovery of the wrongful use and resulting harm to other people – would it make much sense to blame and/or throw away a NECESSARY good working functional tool ……
(although it might perhaps require a fine tuning upgrade and repair from years of past abuse by irresponsible malicious borrowers.)
……BECAUSE of a borrowing party’s misrepresentation and actual INTENTIONAL and IRRESPONSIBLE MISUSE, which resulted in all the damages – both to the tool’s reputation as to functionality and the personal injuries to innocent others that were sustained?
…
Yeah, not too clear, confused me writing it too. lol
Yup, got off easy again this time without the LAME version! lol (I’d really be all over the place)
.
IRONICALLY, IN THE SAFETY/PRIVACY OF THEIR HOMES
PASTY FACED LEFTIST NAZI WEASELS
THINK IT REAL FUNNY AND ENTERTAINING
LAUNCHING FALSE REPORT HARASSMENT MISSILES
BELIEVE ANONYMOUS REPORTS WILL PROTECT THEM
COULDN’T BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH
MALICIOUS-FALSE REPORTS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES?
SERIOUS FORESEEABLE CONSEQUENCES RESULT FROM YOUR “SPOOFS”
(YOU IGNORANT ANTI-AMERICAN…… GOOFS! – see? No foul language!)
spoof
spoofed; spoofing; spoofs
hoax
Hoaxed; hoaxing; hoaxes
.
.
.
MY BEST TO YOU AND YOURS, LEW