8K. The “K” stands for KEEP – so I would not confuse this file with the other saved backups.  I had to split up one BIG FILE into two smaller ones due to the enhanced aggravation of working with too much information at a time.

No doubt much of it operator error since I still have a tendency to issue conflicting commands with accidental movements of this new mouse with the side button (forward-backward I think-don’t use it except for accident).

Anyway, part two, aka, #8K.    Tah-Dah!

Sure am glad I don’t repeat myself much.

This month’s agenda packet didn’t look or feel right.

Heck, the packet wasn’t even stapled together like Syndie always does in the LDPCSD office.  You know?  Those huge heavy commercial staples for multi-paged documents?  Keeps the pages together when turned multiple times, if someone cares to read and study the material.  Mine fell apart very quickly.  Maybe the stapler was broken?  Who knows?

Was this another PETE KAMPA, KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, OR KAMPACS production?

Is this what KAMPA referred to when he said the presentation was in “pieces”.

That forced me to consider how many “OFFICIAL RECORDS” of the LDPCSD have been corrupted with “DRAFTS”, “PROPOSED REVISIONS”, UPDATES, REVISED REPLACEMENTS, outright FABRICATED SUBSTITUTIONS, etc. and processed through other governmental departments, agencies, offices, etc?   MO with ETDs?

an

M.O.

(Modus operandi or Method of Operation)

with

E.T.Ds

”EVIL TWIN DOCUMENTS”

Imagine all those ETDs “making the circuit” as if legitimately constructed and approved by appropriate authorities (Facilitated through a presumption that information furnished by other governmental entities is authentic?)  A massive fraud perpetrated for decades against entitled MERCED RIVER WATER using customers of the LAKE DON PEDRO subdivision with ETDs – especially those bogus District water service maps real estate and land development interests drooled over.

GOSH!  How easy would it be for such unethical individuals to later “replace” particularly damaging or uncomplimentary sections of agenda packets that were originally presented “in pieces” with other “ETD pieces” having the same page numbers?

Just a thought, for anyone who cared to think about it in conjunction with the LDPCSD’s multi-exampled history of utilizing such ETDs and KAMPA’s undeniable past of misrepresenting LDPCSD information to other government departments/agencies.

Sure am glad I don’t repeat myself much.

Seems my agenda requests were not the only items ignored by KAMPA.  Guess he just forgot to mention to the board a claim against the LDPCSD by PG&E for damages to its facilities in the amount of $16,886.26?

It was in KAMPA’s GM Report if someone cared to read it, but no discussion was permitted during the meeting.

Remember a while back when CSD was digging up pipelines at the treatment plant?  Found lines they had no idea why they were there or where they went?  Also exposed a high voltage conduit that was full of water?

Then that STATE MANDATED project was immediately stopped for safety reasons resulting in a MAJOR PG&E emergency call-out of many trucks and personnel?

Well, PG&E wants reimbursement for the repair costs to their underground facilities that were (damaged at some time) while under control of the LDPCSD.

Of course Kampa will likely just turn it over to our insurance carrier.  Kampa can actually hide a lot of his “mischief” with and behind the resources of our public agency along with his own for-profit limited liability company, KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, aka  KAMPACS.

I doubt KAMPA will be able to ignore PG&E and put them off like he does customers who ask legitimate questions that are never answered.

Serious questions about his performance, fiduciary duty and loyalty to the district and the majority of “legal customers” since being returned to the district.

Returned to where he began his infamous water career in 1993.

Returned through a highly unethical board orchestrated closed recruitment process for GM.  A process that insured KAMPA would be GM and then authorized to leverage our million dollar savings in order to expand outside PLACE OF USE water service through a GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM created with public funds and government grant money.

Grant money that was intended to benefit existing LDPCSD customers during a severe drought and specifically noted- NOT FOR EXPANSION OF WATER SERVICE.

Wonder if the UC Merced researchers could expand their project to include how special interest land development corruption has detrimentally influenced the LDPCSD for decades?

How these interests have obstructed the district’s prime directive of serving MERCED RIVER WATER from LAKE Mc CLURE to domestic home sites in the subdivision.

Or how public fund use can be diverted from intended beneficiaries to those special interests?

What about the health effects on those legally entitled to Merced River Water use under WL11395 who are prohibited from drilling their own private water wells yet as MANDATORY CUSTOMERS OF THE LDPCSD BY WAY OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP IN THE SUBDIVISION are forced to subsidize outside PLACE OF USE water service through a GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM utilizing expensive ground wells developed with public funds?

Government grants that could have repaired and replaced our failing primary surface water treatment plant infrastructure instead of expanding KAMPA’s required groundwater “alternate source” that he could then later sell outside the legal Place of Use?

KAMPA planned on selling our newly produced emergency groundwater to land developers not otherwise entitled to water service by the District under water license 11395.  That’s our “SNEAKY PETE” KAMPA!

At the risk of repeating myself – My best to you and yours, Lew 🙂