HEY, WAIT A BIT….WERE LAFCo COMMISSIONERS EVEN PRIVY TO THE EXPANDED BOUNDARIES ON THE MAP – OR JUST LAFCo STAFF?

IF YOU READ the recital carefully, there might be another way to interpret this…..yes indeed, it is a matter of parsing words, but lately that’s all we’ve heard from KAMPA & KOMPANY!

 

THIS WAS DONE WHILE I WAS STILL ON THE BOARD AND I REMEMBER BECAUSE I WAS TOLD I COULD NOT ATTEND THAT LAFCo CONFERENCE - DIRECTORY EMERY ROSS DID!

 

 

“THE MAPS WERE REVIEWED BY THE DISTRICT”  AND “THE MATTER WAS DISCUSSED WITH LAFCo STAFF” (Could be two different situations WITHOUT a meeting of the minds.  Discussion between LAFCo staff and district and they come out of “deliberations” with an agreement and ultimately receive Commissioner Approval without the Commissioners knowing all the facts of how SOI property suddenly jumped into the district service boundary without investigation?)

“THE DISTRICT HAS AGREED THAT THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES DO REFLECT PAST LAFCo ACTIONS AND HAVE AGREED TO HAVE THEM INCLUDED IN THE LAFCo POLICY MANUAL”   Ahhhhh, what LAFCo actions?

WHAT INDIVIDUALS COMPRISED “THE DISTRICT”?

WHAT COUNTY PLANNING STAFF WERE INVOLVED?

WHAT LAFCo STAFF WERE INVOLVED?

WHEN WAS THE DOSCHER ANNEXATION APPROVED?

WHEN WAS AN MSR COMPLETED FOR THAT CSD BOUNDARY CHANGE?

WHY IS THIS THE FIRST MAP TO EVER SHOW THE DOSCHER PROPERTY AS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES AND NOT SOI?

KAMPA STATED LAST WEEK THERE HAS NEVER BEEN AN ANNEXATION TO THIS DISTRICT SINCE 1980…. YET HE OBVIOUSLY AND SPECIFICALLY AVOIDED PRESENTING THIS “OFFICIAL LAFCo MAP” OF OUR BOUNDARIES EVER SINCE HIRED IN OCTOBER OF 2014, WHY?

BEFORE I LEFT THE BOARD (LATE 2014) THERE HAD ALREADY BEEN OBVIOUS TALK OF DISTRICT EXPANSION BEYOND THE PERMITTED AREAS OF THE WATER LICENSE, EVEN DANNY JOHNSON SPOKE OF HAVING FOUND SOMEONE WHO COULD WRITE THE GRANTS FOR THE MONEY FOR THE GROUNDWATER WELLS …..WAS THAT KAMPA A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HIS “BOARD ORCHESTRATED CLOSED RECRUITMENT PROCESS” APPOINTED HIM AND HIS KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, IGM?

WHY WAS I SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED FROM ATTENDING THAT MEETING CONSIDERING I HAD DONE MORE RESEARCH ON THAT ISSUE THAN ANY DIRECTOR ON THE BOARD?  HELL MY GARAGE WAS A MAP LIBRARY!

DIRECTOR EMERY ROSS?  HOW COULD AN OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE PROPERTY OWNER, PREVIOUSLY DENIED WATER SERVICE BY BOTH THE SELLER OF THE LAND HE PURCHASED, AS WELL AS THE LDPCSD, START A COMMERCIAL CATTLE RANCH WITH A “LIBERATED WATER METER” FROM ANOTHER RANCHER, DEVELOP A STOCK WATERING POND IN THE MIDDLE OF SUMMER NEAR AN UNDOCUMENTED WATERLINE WHICH HAPPENS TO RUN THROUGH HIS PROPERTY WITHOUT A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OR CHECK METER;  WHO IS REPEATEDLY RE-ELECTED DUE TO THE GERRYMANDERING OF THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES – BEEN ASKED BY THE GRAND JURY TO STEP DOWN AS PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD – POSSIBLY NOT HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH DETERMINING WHERE THE LEGAL LDPCSD WATER SERVICE BOUNDARIES WERE WHEN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS CONCERNING HIS OWN WATER SERVICE HISTORY WERE SOME HOW LOST THROUGH THE YEARS? 

STRANGE.  I RECALL AROUND THE TIME OF THE RAW WATER LINE BREAK AT BARRETTS COVE KAMPA SPECIFICALLY SAYING THERE HAD BEEN NO ACTION/WORK ON THE DOSCHER PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OR POSSIBILITY OF RUNNING A NEW RAW WATER LINE THROUGH HIS PROPERTY INVESTIGATED…….I ASKED DURING A MEETING – YET NOW THIS?

 

IF NOT FOR THE FACT I’M EXHAUSTED AND NEED SLEEP…..I MIGHT BELIEVE THIS WAS ALREADY A NIGHTMARE THAT JUST WON’T END

…..THAT’S IT, I’VE GOT TO CRASH.  GOOD NIGHT!  MORE LATER

MY BEST TO YOU AND YOURS, LEW

 

AFRAID TO SLEEP….MIGHT WAKE UP TO DISCOVER LDPCSD HAS ANNEXED DEATH VALLEY!

 

Categories: Uncategorized.