April 5, 2022 | by Lew | Comments Off on THE ANSWER: WORKING TOGETHER…
… for over 20 years to defraud MR WECs of the subdivision (the designated “deep pocket” for LAFCO Annexation Developments outside water license permitted PLACE OF USE!)
THE QUESTION: WHY DID LAFCO APPROVE LDPCSD’s EXPANDED SERVICE BOUNDARY? (below)
THE DECEPTION NEVER ENDS!
YUP! MR WECs (Merced River Water Entitled Customers) of the Lake Don Pedro residential subdivision have been forced to pay for subsidized LAFCO ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT for over 40 years – thanks to MR WECs “deep pocket” designation as MANDATORY CUSTOMERS OF THE LDPCSD.
(Cute huh? LAFCO sets up a FRAUD OF A CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT to exploit WATER LICENSE 11395 that legally served the residential subdivision – so as to ultimately provide a SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION WATER SERVICE (OUTSIDE THE LICENSE PERMITTED SUBDIVISION) FOR THOUSANDS OF ACRES IN ANNEXATIONS LAFCO MADE INTO THEIR OWN CREATED LDPCSD!
EXCLUDED FROM MEETING (Already knew I would object to approval just as I have since!
This was the meeting I (as a duly elected sitting director on the Lake Don Pedro CSD Board) was PROHIBITED FROM ATTENDING! Gee, how disheartening these “planning professionals” were unconcerned with the fact I had researched and studied those LAFCO ANNEXATIONS into the LDPCSD more extensively than any other LDPCSD representative there that day. (But of course one director permitted to attend had been using expensive groundwater substitution for his cattle ranching business since the first RANCHITO GROUNDWATER WELL WAS FORCED DEVELOPED IN THE EARLY 1990’s AS A RESULT OF A STATE WATER AUDIT OF THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT WHICH HOLDS WATER LICENSE 11395! Hum, conflict of interest perhaps? lol)
CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORS PERMITTED?
Yet, how could Emery Ross, a long time sitting director whose business was actually started with a stolen water meter from another rancher; who is rarely prepared for monthly district board meetings through SELF STUDY of the prepared agenda packet (evidenced by the many years of documented questions he has asked whose answers were clearly contained in the packet*, a director who has on numerous occasions intentionally obstructed intended district progress in many important matters (often accompanied with his FAKE COWBOY ANTICS), https://youtu.be/rKSunIuNTIo, and with such clear conflicting and contradictory interests never-the-less be permitted to attend and be involved with that EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS LAFCO DECISION apparently not based on actual fact?
Why are legitimate requests for PUBLIC INFORMATION regarding such past LAFCO AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT annexations refused?
Why is there a gigantic gap in the time line index for records (which are no longer available) on the county website concerning LAFCO ANNEXATIONS INTO AN EXISTING DISTRICT?
Questions only pile on top of more questions.
Serious, very important questions have languished for answers for decades while customers are told they must pay more for “THEIR WATER SERVICE”? OR THE SPECIAL BENEFIT WATER SERVICE FOR OTHERS NOT ENTITLED?
My best to you and yours, Lew
*Apparently, the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District suffers from a ridiculous “all inclusive policy” – which permits ANYONE – regardless if qualified or not, to hold positions that ultimately determine how the rest of us will live in OUR OWN COUNTRY!
You can see this sort of insanity everywhere now….. all these crooks do is just “tweak” the qualifications for ANY POSITION and such ridiculous outcomes – that defy fucking common sense – routinely occur. Like men competing against women in physically demanding sports? Or Communists and Socialists etc. serving in US Government regulatory or defense positions?
Emery Ross is a long time OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE SPECIAL INTEREST COMMERCIAL CATTLE RANCHER WHO HAS BEEN AT THE CENTER OF THIS COMMUNITY WATER NIGHTMARE SINCE HOOKING UP WITH PETE KAMPA BACK IN THE MID 1990s.
HE HAS REMAINED ON THE LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DESPITE THE FACT HE CANNOT READ OR COMPREHEND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN MONTHLY AGENDA PACKETS (or other related materials) WITHOUT ASSISTANCE.
THIS IS THE REASON EMERY IS OFTEN DUMBFOUNDED AT MEETINGS AND ASKS NEEDLESS QUESTIONS (or makes strange and peculiar comments) WHOSE ANSWERS (or discussed information) WERE CLEARLY ALREADY CONTAINED IN THE PACKET MATERIAL.
NO ONE WANTS TO POINT OUT THE DANGERS IN HAVING AN INCOMPETENT DIRECTOR ON A BOARD WHO MENTALLY CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THE MATERIAL UPON WHICH HIS DECISIONS ARE BASED.
NO ONE WANTS TO APPEAR MEAN SPIRITED, but considering the current state of our America and the fact it is being led by a career crime family demented sell out politician who has already caused untold death, injury, suffering and destruction to so many …. IN MY COUNTRY?…….
I PERSONALLY DON’T GIVE A FUCK WHAT THE LEFT THINKS!
THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INSANE!
Further expansion of a subsidized groundwater special benefit water service for LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE WATER LICENSE PLACE OF USE FOR WHICH THE LDPCSD HAS NO LEGAL DUTY OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE SQUAT …….
DURING ANOTHER EMERGENCY DROUGHT?
Yup, long overdue to point out the absurdity of permitting unqualified and corrupted individuals to FAKE SERVICE IN GOVERNMENT POSITIONS THAT NEGATIVELY AFFECTS ALL CITIZENS –
This (the above) is only an audio presentation of the official meeting CD with exception of the opening title; an April 2016 photo of the Ranchito Groundwater Well # 2 (which is non-producing once again); and a file photo of LDPCSD Board President Danny Johnson.
Such meeting recordings were supposed to be available on the LDPCSD website after Kampa’s big UPGRADE in the name of government transparency (like other CSDs provide for their customers) but of course our district “Board of Defectors” prefer customers remain ignorant as to their activities.
Why do they still conceal the 1993 Merced Irrigation District shape file map which Peter Kampa used as the basis for his 5 year campaign (2014-2019) to misdirect government grants to the benefit of LAFCO ANNEXATIONS he set up 20 years ago (1994-1997 as a “rogue GM“ operating outside the approval of the board of directors back then) so those property owners could receive a special benefit subsidized groundwater substitution service with which to develop their properties with all substantial additional costs paid for by the oblivious legal water users of the subdivision who do not require such water substitution?
Shouldn’t those who receive an expensive special benefit pay for that special benefit water service? A no brainer yeah?
The damage has been done. So why continue to hide the material Kampa used to misdirect this district for over 20 years? The material that was used to digitally fabricate a file that was to surreptitiously replace the legitimate official STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS JUNE 1978 MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE MAP on file for water license 11395? Sure looks like a serious criminal conspiracy to fabricate and replace an official government document with a self serving fake map created by Peter Kampa. Yeah, I can see how they would want to forget the whole matter, that’s what is wrong within our Nation right now – NO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY USING PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES! But I digress….
Was it truly a Merced Irrigation District map for an old abandoned project (South Shore, 2,010 acres) or was it a map Kampa had fabricated through his CSDA cohorts and then simply attributed it to be one produced by Merced Irrigation District engineers? There must be something else very interesting about this piece of evidence that is crucial to fully understanding exactly what transpired under the Kampa management of our district compliments of his acquiescent Board of Directors who only rubber stamped EVERYTHING KAMPA required. Heck the board didn’t even check his background history with the LDPCSD before handing over a million dollars in cash for Kampa’s 20 year criminal conspiracy to reconfigure our surface water treatment plant. Everything they did, purchase of a property with an existing well, drilling more very expensive groundwater wells, etc., was all from the 1990s play book. All waiting for the Kampa return in 2014 to make it reality. Anyway…. Here’s another episode of the continuing fraud that is the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District.
Comments prior to the meeting start……
Apparently two large pieces of paper handed out to the board by the GM so they could more easily read some information (unknown what information GM was referencing at first but later identified by the board secretary who stated it would be provided to public on the LDPCSD website. REF: May 19, 2020 quote for services.)
Strange – the only thing our website was upgraded for while Kampa was here was to distribute KAMPA PROPAGANDA REGARDING HIS 20 YEAR LAFCO ANNEXATION PLAN THAT REQUIRED A SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM PAID FOR BY THE MAJORITY OF LEGAL CUSTOMERS!
How soon such PRO CUSTOMER UPGRADES were forgotten while pursuing continuation and expansion of this special benefit SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM. How soon everyone, including MR WECs [Merced River Water Entitled Customers] forgot what HONEST TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SERVICE was. Certainly understandable that the victim legal users might forget with all the other government failures going on around them which no doubt makes it much easier for those public leaders without integrity to cheat and deceive customers they supposedly serve. Yup, local, state, federal…..it is all the same without some semblance of accountability for the intentional wrongdoing and outright law violation committed by those who claim to serve the public.
And to add insult to injury – all of their years of carefully planned cheating is disguised and camouflaged with the typical lame excuse of having the “best intentions for the community” while completely ignoring the clear criminal nature of their activities. That’s why “they” never answer questions – because they can’t without pointing an accusatory finger at themselves. Result? These “community leaders” just ignore legitimate questions and “play dumb” until complaints evaporate away just like their integrity and commitment to legitimate public service.
Please appreciate that I am not referring to simple mistakes or oversights. Not a temporary lack of judgment due to some sort of impairment. Heck, we are all humans and mistakes are expected despite efforts to weed out corrupt public servants. No mistake, I am talking about highly educated and trained individuals with many years experience who have INTENTIONALLY DECIDED TO VIOLATE THE LAW in order to pursue what they wanted to do, not what the majority of legal customers wanted, but what BOARD DIRECTORS WANTED TO DO WITH PUBLIC FUNDS and RESOURCES of a local public agency.
A criminal conspiracy for sure. Simple as that – they knowingly violated the 1978 service boundary established by the State Water Board based on assurances from a previous rogue LDPCSD employee who was unethically returned in 2014 only to finish the special interest work of providing water service to LAFCO ANNEXATIONS INTO OUR DISTRICT he set up twenty years earlier without board knowledge or approval at that time.
Without any legal accountability such betrayal and diversion of public funds to “special interest movers and shakers” (to increase their private profit margins) will only continue. While entitled customers are provided a lower quality water and must subsidize special benefit services – they can only watch as their surface water treatment plant is reconfigured into a groundwater substitution facility to benefit annexed properties that SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ANNEXED INTO THE DISTRICT BASED ON LAFCO’s OWN REGULATIONS. Wild yeah?
ABSOLUTELY ASTONISHING! Board President Danny Johnson must clarify “what time he is using to open the meeting” because a malfunctioning clock has remained in that boardroom for many years. Heck a Grand Jury several years ago clearly suggested LDPCSD meetings should start on time. So why hasn’t this inexpensive clock been replaced years ago?
Answer: Makes a great excuse for consistently late starting meetings.
Prior to start of meeting…..chit chat, winds, COVID-19 shield vs mask, environment will become quite nasty soon, with the flu, harvesting, air quality, testing, having to answer questions honestly asked by COVID trackers, respecting quarantine restrictions, etc. Director positions behind dais changed due to social distancing requirements.
[CD COUNTER: 5:00 meeting start]
Board President Danny Johnson: Ladies and Gentlemen, one o’clock on August 17th, call to order Lake Don Pedro Community Services District, quorum, ABSENT DIRECTOR WARREN and HANKEMIER, appropriate staff present, stand for Pledge.
Director Emery Ross (Outside Merced Irrigation District Place of Use commercial cattle rancher since 1993 -previously worked with Kampa back then as well) makes an immediate point of order.
Board Secretary notes for the record that there are (again) no public members present at the meeting. Any surprise when legitimate questions are never answered?
(Board consensus to include the extra information….MARTECH May 19th 2020 quote information will be placed on the website…but if presented at meeting as part of the agenda, why not already on website with the other material?)
GM McGOWAN – GM mentions intake emergency on Friday. Secretary suggests explaining situation. Electrical problems affecting pumps …lots of damage to electrical panel, upgrade temporarily sufficient until complete replacement of existing intake equipment.
Hold off on Section 3 of agenda – Director Ross correction in Minutes…
CONSENT AGENDA – approved with corrections due to mis-identification of directors present at last meeting in the prepared Minutes.
P 19-25 PG&E Lease agreement.
Director Ross questions location name of Granite Springs used by AT&T, APPROVED.
(p 26-41) IRWMP Grant prelim report and grant information – helping with engineering study. $30K reimbursement for expenses already incurred.
Director Ross asked for clarifications on page 39 – (Regarding what GM referred to as “free money –no pay back”) and made comments. Paying for rate increase study.
Director Nelle Sperry – questions when it will be put into action. APPROVED
Tank repair (pages 42-45) GM discusses cleaning plan. APPROVED
JOHNSON: page 46, Standing Operating Procedures regarding water samples.
GM McGown, how to properly collect samples as policy. Everyone now on the same page with these traditional standards. (Apparently, in the past a test sample could have a differing results depending upon where the sample was actually taken.)
Director Ross questions MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) meaning. Discussion about where samples are taken. State recognizes our water wells which now must also have water tested even if going to the water plant for final treatment before distribution. (LEW: SURE WELLS SHOULD BE TESTED BECAUSE THEY INTRODUCE CONTAMINANTS INTO THE BLENDED WATER THAT IS NECESSARY FOR LAFCO ANNEXATION WATER SERVICE – SO ENTITLED CUSTOMERS MUST CONSUME AN INFERIOR PRODUCT. What would you rather have, quality Merced River water from the lake, or groundwater that must be treated for contaminants such as arsenic?) APPROVED
DIRECTOR ROSS attempts to comment again…President Johnson back on agenda, page 57 –CEQA assessment, GM McGowan no further information than what GM now verbally furnishes.
President Johnson last item, Page 58 tank inspection reports. Secretary asks the board president to indicate for the record that the previously absent directors had arrived at the meeting. President Johnson – Director Warren came in 1:18 at Hankemeier at 1:19, (and noted they did not participate in prior four matters) GM discusses procedure and the anticipation of much work to clean up/repair the older concrete tanks. Johnson brings up issue of securing the tanks and the installation of locking gates.
GO back to section 3 of agenda (explaining to Warren and Hankemeier what had happened prior to their arrival.)
President Johnson mentioned the required GM evaluation review and asked McGowan to write his own which the board would later review.
(35 min 32 seconds) GM REPORT on pages 3 -7. McGowan – Higher rates must happen. Regarding the company hired ($30,000?) to set up rate and fee increases, their suggested increases were astronomical – A FEW HUNDRED PERCENT! GM stated he advised them to PUMP THE BRAKES on that plan as it wasn’t going to happen. Must pull some CIP (Capital improvement projects) – and come up with some type of rate increase that everyone could “STOMACH”. Also looking at other water company rates – and their recent rate increases [boy, I bet Pete Kampa, now the nearby Groveland CSD GM and his CSDA buddies) have all sorts of helpful information to assist in raising our rates thanks to Kampa’s shameful misdirection for the entire time he was managing the LDPCSD while developing a LAFCO ANNEXATION SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION POLICY where MR WECS continues to pay for special benefit water services for annexed property owners when the LDPCSD has no moral obligation or legal duty to furnish any service.]
Hear that before by any chance? lol
We get three “in person visits” from this PAID FOR GROUP OF CONSULTANTS TO ASSIST IN RAISING OUR RATES. This “consulting company” stated we (district) are not moving in the direction we should – difficult to understand because the GM spoke so fast. Sounded like perhaps more money –
Check it out: (37:43) Unimproved lots? Outside POU lots? Really can’t tell because GM rushed through the words so fast. Perhaps referencing the availability fees not collected from properties within the POU that lie outside the subdivision proper? Like the “new service line” for the new home at Merced Falls Road x Ranchito Drive discussed at the end of this meeting. Although not in the subdivision, the WL11395 1978 POU map certainly illustrates this property within the POU but not part of subdivision. Have all properties in that area paid availability fees like the unimproved properties within the subdivision? Or do these properties only pay the availability balance owed at the time of development? Who knows? I was asking for that information many years ago while a director on the board AND NEVER RECEIVED IT! Lol Big surprise huh?
PROPOSITION 218 vote ….. must attempt to convince public they need to pay more money?
(LEW HERE: while simultaneously avoiding any mention of responsibility and accountability for the last five years of mismanagement resulting in a Notice of Violation from the State Water Board and even more properties being added to the OUTSIDE Merced Irrigation District PLACE OF USE report – which is still absent in the agenda packet since Pete Kampa removed it years ago?)
President Johnson suggested “we” should have done this a long time ago? (RATE INCREASES)
(LEW: Dear Lord. Why didn’t they just call the State Water board during those 5 years to confirm if what they were doing was actually legal under the water license instead of BLOWING ALL THE GRANT MONEY ON A GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM FOR LAFCO ANNEXATIONS KAMPA SET UP 20 YEARS EARLIER?)
GM stated only $17,000 paid to consultants so far…..(yet $30,000 was approved by board, yes?)
(LEW: Danny Johnson talking about any sort of “reality” after what he has done to this district is absolutely disgusting. The reality is the Board of Directors led by Danny Johnson pursued special interest activities rather than what was best for the legal customers in the LDP subdivision – pure and simple.)
McGowan stated the district would have no problem in showing the need for the increase rates and fees.
[LEW –which in some respects I might agree, HOWEVER, CONVENIENTLY OVERLOOKS BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY FOR WHY IT IS EVEN NEEDED. Does this NEGLIGENT AND SPECIAL INTEREST BOARD DESERVE THE CONFIDENCE AND TRUST THEY HAVE BETRAYED FOR 5 YEARS WHILE KAMPA WAS PURSUING WATER FOR HIS 20 YEAR OLD SLEEPING ANNEXATIONS?
Years of continuing lies to the public about some conclusive evidence that the district possessed (through Pete Kampa of course) in the form of a map that proved they had a right to continue expanding water service outside the PLACE OF USE OF THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION and MIDPOU MAP …. yet even after Kampa left when his plan was uncovered – they still refuse to provide this “conclusive” proof which brought us to this point of financial crisis? lol What a bunch of lying cheats!
Ross and Johnson continue talking about spending the entire $50,000 to get the increase. (LEW, I am confused, they must have bumped that number another $20K because I only recall $30,000 being approved for these “rate hike” consultants. As always with this district, something appears incorrect here.)
LEW: Johnson argues because the district hasn’t raised rates in so many years, we need to now, yet fails to mention what his board did with the million in cash from the first successful PROP 218 —- spent it to assist LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTY OWNERS and not the LEGAL MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS of the subdivision who have watched their former SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT be reconfigured into A GROUND WATER SUBSTITUTION FACILITY FOR OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE LAND DEVELOPERS WHO WILL ONLY INCREASE THE GROUNDWATER DEMAND WITH EVERY NEW SERVICE PROVIDED – ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE PROPOSED ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS — YET THE THOUSANDS OF LEGAL CUSTOMERS OF THE SUBDIVISION CONTINUE TO PAY MORE FOR THIS BETRAYAL AND ABUSE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES that benefit owners of land our district has no legal duty or moral obligation to provide DIDDLY SQUAT!
Johnson calls for community support after 5 years of absolute betrayal and refusal to tell the truth or answer legitimate questions as to what they’ve already done to get us to this point? HA!
Where is the guarantee the BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL NOT SIMPLY BETRAY THE LEGAL CUSTOMERS ONCE AGAIN BY CONTINUING TO EXPAND OUTSIDE MIDPOU WATER SERVICE once things die down a bit?
If the Board wants PUBLIC TRUST they should act in ways that encourage such, not by continuing to hide their past deceptions to the public when they arrogantly pursued Kampa’s unethical twenty year old annexation plan.
SIMPLE LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS BY CUSTOMERS IGNORED FOR 5 YEARS – YET DIRECTORS NOW WANT TRUST and are demented enough to believe they deserve it as the self-proclaimed community saviors they pretend to be? Lol
How can customers possibly understand the situation when the board CONSISTENTLY REFUSES TO ANSWER LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS?
WHY WAS THE OUTSIDE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE REPORT NOT RETURNED TO THE AGENDA PACKET SINCE IT WAS THE ONLY METHOD FOR CUSTOMERS TO MONITOR SPECIAL BENEFIT SERVICE OUTSIDE THE WATER LICENSE APPROVED PLACE OF USE?
And this board wants – NEEDS – public trust? Wow
Danny Johnson states he is not a “spinner of facts”? Dear Lord this meeting was full of wishful and incorrect statements such as that.
Perform a rate increase study “in-house”? Geez – either way important facts are being ignored.
LEW: REAL REASON A RATE INCREASE WAS NOT PROPOSED OR INSTITUTED WITHIN LAST FIVE YEARS?
DISTRICT WAS BEING INTENTIONALLY MISDIRECTED INTO A GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM WHICH RECONFIGURED OUR SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT INTO A SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SPECIAL BENEFIT FACILITY FOR MANY LAFCO ANNEXATIONS (outside Place of Use for Merced River water) that PETE KAMPA HAD WRONGFULLY SET UP TWENTY YEARS EARLIER WHEN OPERATING AS A ROGUE GM OUTSIDE THE DIRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE THEN BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
KAMPA RESIGNED IN 1997 (moving on to screw another community services district) ONLY TO BE UNETHICALLY RETURNED IN 2014 TO THE LDPCSD BY THE DANNY JOHNSON BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO SURREPTITIOUSLY FINISH THE JOB IN FURNISHING WATER SERVICE TO ANNEXED PROPERTIES WITH EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER DEVELOPED THROUGH GOVERNMENT GRANTS TO ASSIST CURRENT CUSTOMERS DURING EMERGENCY DROUGHT!
THOSE GRANTS WERE FOR EXISTING CUSTOMER USE ONLY AND WERE SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED FROM BEING USED TO DEVELOP MORE WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS! CLEAR DECEPTION AND FRAUD HAS BEEN USED AGAINST THE LEGAL CUSTOMERS OF THE LDP SUBDIVISION FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.
Board President Johnson speaks of $50,000 to be used for the consultants to assist in raising rates, but when was it increased from the initially approved $30,000?
GM stated Pete Kampa in 2015 started researching with consultants about raising our rates. (Of course he did! Kampa knew exactly where he had placed the financial security of this district – in the hands of special interest owners of LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTY IN THE LDPCSD SERVICE DISTRICT – disregarding their own LAFCO regulations, state regulations, but most importantly –what was best for the legal customers of this chronically misled community services district. “COMMUNITY” was a carefully chosen descriptive word for such an intentionally mismanaged local agency because of its vagueness. “COMMUNITY” negatively strikes at the very heart of what a SPECIAL DISTRICT was, and is, advertised to be – a limited service to a specifically defined area with a particular group of customers who are charged only for the cost in providing the service. All of this intentionally violated through the creation of a FRAUD OF A SPECIAL DISTRICT. The FINAL BLOW? GUESS WHO was returned unethically through a “closed GM recruitment process” in 2014 to assist the LDPCSD? A 20 year CSDA (CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION) board director and former rogue LDPCSD GM! Much like hiring an active arsonist to manage CALFIRE incidents.
LEW’S VIEW? SIMPLE. NO MORE MONEY UNTIL LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS ANSWERED ABOUT ACTIVITIES THAT BROUGHT US TO THIS POINT OF FINANCIAL CRISIS!
Danny Johnson talked about a “NEEDS LIST” and a “WANTS LIST” for the district.
GM McGOWAN stated the primary intake pumps at the lake should be the main focus now. (LEW: agreed, in fact, should have been the target for repair and upgrade with the first grants Kampa obtained – however, fixing those primary intake pumps at the lake would only assist the LEGAL WATER CUSTOMERS and would not help in providing what Kampa desperately sought – a special benefit water service to all those LAFCO ANNEXATIONS pad for by the legal users! Wow. A 20 year California Special Districts Association board director violating every single characteristic of a California special district just so he could get water to his pet annexations set up 20 years earlier.
WHOLE SYSTEM METERS – 10% of meters under registering, half way done. Upgrading meter in the best way they can, replacing one at a time.
Director Ross: Board is ready to increase rates – need to make raising rates and fees a top priority.
(Too bad board wasn’t ready to answer legitimate questions regarding past activities leading to this financial crisis.)
Still dealing with bad meters and a bad auto-read tower system converted into a drive by auto read? Brought to you by another former LDPCSD GM that refused to obey board direction and on his own authority purchased a system that WOULD NOT WORK IN HILLY LAKE DON PEDRO! District customers have had to deal with this crap for many years. INTEGRITY AND HONESTY OF DIRECTORS AND STAFF IS IMPERATIVE TO A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT!
FOLKS, STARTING AT 1:06.08 of the meeting CD, you will have to listen for yourself as to what GM McGOWAN is saying because he is talking so fast. Here’s what I got out of that ramble: RANCHITO GROUNDWELL #2 (One of Pete Kampa’s new wells, which has already had to be repaired a few times) – Replaced the pump motor six months ago, ran for 14 days then fried, good news is warranty will cover yet evaluation of the system also calls for an upgraded motor.
LEW VIEW: ALL THESE CONTINUING AND ESCALATING EXPENSES (IN ADDITION TO ALL PAST COSTS) SHOULD BE PAID FOR BY THOSE LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTY OWNERS WHO ACTUALLY RECEIVE THAT SPECIAL BENEFIT OF GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION!
What is so damn hard to understand? Pay for what you use.
THEY ARE OUTSIDE THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER (LAKE DON PEDRO RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND GOLF COURSE) PER WATER LICENSE 11395 THAT OUR DISTRICT HAS OPERATED UNDER SINCE FORMATION, WHY HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF STATE REGULATIONS FOR OVER 40 YEARS?
COULD THIS BE RELATED? Why is a commercial cattle ranching director, whose property lies outside the legal place of use for Merced River water, able to receive an extremely expensive special benefit subsidized groundwater substituted water service for the same cost as the thousands of legal MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS in the residential subdivision? Why are other proposed residential subdivisions adjacent to the LDP subdivision that are also OUTSIDE THE MID PLACE OF USE to be provided such expensive substituted water service that is perpetually paid for by the MR WECs of the subdivision? How did such a noble concept of a CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT become so corrupted and special interest focused from day one? But I digress….
Board then pats itself on the back for developing more than one special interest groundwater well – saying to effect…..
“Golly gee, where would we be regarding water license compliance with the State Water Board if we didn’t have other groundwater wells developed?” Pssst, hey “bored of defectors”…… you misused grant funds specifically provided to assist EXISTING WATER USING CUSTOMERS DURING AN EMERGENCY DROUGHT and NOT DEVELOPING MORE WATER SERVICES FOR PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE LEGAL PLACE OF USE FOR WATER LICENSE 11395!
Sounds like they are essentially saying, good thing we misrepresented and developed what we had, because as these groundwater wells fail we have other wells to cover the water loss for state compliance reporting! WHAT A BUNCH OF DECEITFUL LYING CROOKS!
And to think PETE KAMPA’S PLAN – in his OWN WORDS, was to develop more of these extremely expensive and unreliable groundwater wells in our fractured rock drought prone geological area as the district continued to provide further expensive groundwater substitution to even more LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE OUR LEGAL PLACE OF USE UNDER THE WATER LICENSE!
A NEVER ENDING CYCLE OF DEMAND-SUPPLY FUTILITY – FURNISH MORE WAER OUTSIDE THE MIDPOU – DEVELOP MORE EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER WELLS—- all the WHILE THE LEGAL USERS WERE STUCK WITH THE EVER INCREASING BILLS AND RECEIVING LESS FOR THEIR MONEY!
Making upgrade adjustments to a well that should never have been developed in the first place and MR WECs continues to pay for such deceptions.
Board discussion as to their own opinions of what might have occurred resulting in a well we haven’t been able to use in sometime and that has been on the agenda for years.
DOES THIS FAILURE OF RANCHITO #2 HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE OUTSIDE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE REPORT FROM THE AGENDA WHEN KAMPA FIRST RETURNED TO THE LDPCSD? THIS REPORT WAS THE ONLY REPORT CUSTOMERS COULD RELIABLY USE TO TRACK HOW MUCH AND WHERE THIS SPECIAL BENEFIT SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER REPLACEMENT WAS BEING USED OUTSIDE THE SUBDIVISION POU.
WHY WAS THE OMIDPOU REPORT REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC’S VIEW IN THE AGENDA PACKET?
AND THE BOARD WANTS MORE MONEY NOW?
GM reads aloud portions of the electrical engineer’s submersible pump report regarding the Ranchito #2 well motor.
ARE YOU VIEWERS READY FOR A “NOT SO BIG OF A SURPRISE”? …..
Regarding the protection relay on the control panel….“some configuration is not proper for the motor protection” had to change some parameters….. based on below….. “over current protection range has to be changed”….. “ground fault range has to be changed”……. “voltage on balance percentage has to be changed…….” blah, blah, blah —- essentially, not installed correctly.
They were told by the GM to replace the pump because all we knew then was it was brand new pump …..(some director: had only been in there 14 days)….GM – well this was the second time this happened – The pump was just finaled two years ago.
READY FOR THIS? NO PAPER TRAIL ON ANY OF IT! (Missing records are often a good clue as to “funny business” taking place.)
Danny Johnson comments on his experience in such pump motor related issues – if they rotate the legs (apparently the wire connectors) improperly a motor will run backwards. (Anyone check Danny’s legs? lol)
EMERGENCY BARGE RENOVATION PROJECT: September of this year for completion date. (RECALL ALL THE $$$ SPENT PRIOR TO THIS CURRENT BARGE PROJECT? District threw away a lot of cash on abandoned plans.)
Secretary response to Director Ross: Only three director incumbents are running for election so they are automatically selected. GOOD! I’ve always said those directors involved with this 5 year special interest deception should remain directors until it is cleaned up! Rest of their lives probably, yeah? lol
Vehicle maintenance “in house” and going well. (I really appreciate much of what GM McGowan has done. Just a darn shame he is apparently still covering for Kampa’s past dishonest activities.
WHERE IS THAT 1993 Merced Irrigation District shape file map that KAMPA BASED HIS RECONFIGURATION OF OUR DISTRICT UPON THE ENTIRE TIME HE WAS HERE—-FOR THE SECOND DISHONEST TIME AS WELL?)
LAST ITEM: Two “atta-boys” (written compliments) from public regarding employee activity. Also good news.
IN ANSWER TO DIRECTOR ROSS questioning about working on an owner’s side of a meter. GM explained the district had moved a customer’s water line – abandoned old one, had new one installed.
CONFUSING COMMENTS: Removed one of two meters on one property and then relocated a meter for new construction on the corner of Ranchito Drive and Merced Falls Road. Service line was originally going to be over 1,000 feet from his house on a different street. Owners paid the district to move the service line – by tapping into the Ranchito main. This was a property that had a well but owner decided to hook into LDPCSD.
VIEWERS, this is a bit confusing because of the term “availability” (fee) used in the GM’s explanation. A standby fee (charged on property taxes for all unimproved lots within the LDP subdivision – entitled to water service by the LDPCSD) was changed to “availability fee” when properties OUTSIDE THE LEGAL POU OF THE WATER LICENSE were annexed into the district. Two completely different animals that unscrupulous GMs, directors, staff, etc have used interchangeably for decades to confuse the issue.
STANDBY FEE refers to properties that have a right to water service under the water license and they are clearly documented in the California Public Utilities Commission approval of the LDPCSD formation from a private company, as well as the MID 1978 POU map. There were however, several properties outside the subdivision boundaries that the Merced Irrigation District and State Water Board allowed into the service area map of June 1978, so that fee should have probably been referred to as a standby fee since the property is entitled to Merced River water differing from later “availability named parcels” clearly OUTSIDE THE MIDPOU which could only hope to secure water in the future without a right to it under the 1978 POU map. (Such as Pete Kampa’s slumbering 900 ac proposed residential subdivision east of Merced Falls Road towards Lake McClure, which is clearly outside the June 1978 POU map. For this reason I do not believe this present case is a violation of the LDPCSD Resolution prohibiting further outside MIDPOU water service…..the property is clearly within the POU MAP BOUNDARY.
But this still doesn’t explain why the OUTSIDE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE REPORT has been removed from the agenda for public review – has the district already added further properties for groundwater substituted water service – other than those that were previously concealed but discovered during the State Water Board investigations? (Sure backfired on Kampa yeah? He was lying and deceiving in an attempt to add more properties within the MIDPOU – not have other OUTSIDE MIDPOU PROPERTIES that skated by for decades finally included into the OUTSIDE MIDPOU COMPLIANCE REPORT! Guess this only goes to show how cheating doesn’t always pay off for the cheaters, but still, MR WECs got stuck with all the added costs which is not fair at all.)
Director Ross: leaks, grant to fix leaks, will leaks every stop? Good grief. As I recall somewhere around $250,000 + was spent on replacing service lines that were not even leaking. REM? One of those “dog and pony show” construction projects of Kampa’s just before he resigned from the LDPCSD for the second time after being caught being deceitful? Some things never change.
Meeting concluded by Board President (according to the same clock this time – lol) at 2:21PM
Alrighty then, more blah blah blah about their unethical activities after the next monthly board meeting.
Perhaps Pete Kampa has not actually read the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) September 28th, 2017 Notice of Violation for alleged WL11395 Water Right violations?
How could he miss and/or ignore the State’s clear determination of facts relating to the PLACE OF USE for Merced River water per Water License 11395 held by the Merced Irrigation District (MID)?
Why does Kampa continue displaying the June 20th, 1977 MID POU Map on the LDPCSD website as the official MID POU Boundary map when the REVISED JUNE 15th, 1978 IS THE OFFICIAL MAP ON FILE WITH THE SWRCB?
Is he trying to passively communicate with others who might view the website for information as to their outside MIDPOU property interests Kampa has previously promised water for their developments?
Why continue with SUCH OUTRIGHT WATER BOUNDARY MISREPRESENTATIONS ALREADY RESOLVED BY THE SWRCB MULTIPLE TIMES?
Why does Kampa ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE the legitimate June 15th, 1978 MID POU Map which is on file with the SWRCB as the POU for WL11395?
How can Kampa be allowed to continue managing a local public agency like the LDPCSD according to his own SPECIAL INTEREST rules and regulations which clearly contradict what the State of California has already determined, established and documented as the operating law?
Below is the map Kampa still displays on the LDPCSD website – WHICH IS INCORRECT!
AND OF COURSE….the above INCORRECT EXPANDED WATER SERVICE MAP also conceals the KAMPA SLUMBERING PROPOSED 900 acre RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE LDPCSD OFFICE THAT EVEN SITTING DIRECTORS BACK THEN WERE COMPLETELY UNAWARE—- heck, even MARIPOSA COUNTY LAFCO illustrated that property as SOI (SPHERE OF INFLUENCE) up until only a few months before KAMPA’s UNETHICAL RETURN AND APPOINTMENT AS GM….
…but, but, but……how could that happen with a dedicated and honest employee on the job you might ask? lol!
That question presumes a dedication and honesty to the lawful functioning of the LDPCSD to the benefit of the intended customers of that former SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT the MR WECs of the subdivision that simply did not exist.
The focus since “DAY ONE” of the LDPCSD (and obviously encouraged and supported by the two district forming county LAFCOs who gained land development revenue without the liability of being required to provide the necessary potable water service in a known drought prone area) was to extend those main pipelines even further beyond the PLACE OF USE BOUNDARY OF THE SUBDIVISION FOR MERCED RIVER WATER PER WL11395.
Back then KAMPA was forced to keep his private ANNEXATION DEALS concealed from the BOARD OF DIRECTORS yet now, KAMPA has a fully co-operating board of defectors that have taken ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST WHAT-SO-EVER IN THE LEGAL POU OF WL11395 preferring instead to fund a $35,000 digital mapping project which enabled PETE KAMPA to fabricate his FAKE POU MAP to include his annexed properties from 20 years earlier.
So sad our “YES BOARD” did not have EVEN ONE DIRECTOR OUT OF FIVE willing to stand up to KAMPA and “do the right thing” – they could have stopped this continuing WASTE OF PUBLIC RESOURCES by demanding an authenticWL11395 POU BOUNDARY MAP from the State Water Board or the Merced Irrigation District rather than permitting KAMPA to orchestrate this elaborate fraud built on false, antiquated, and misrepresented informationto reconfigure the POU just like KAMPA & KOMPANY reconfigured our SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT INTO A GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FACILITY FOR LAND DEVELOPERS OUTSIDE THE WL11395 POU for MERCED RIVER WATER!
Since Pete Kampa returned to the LDPCSD in October 2014 he has only continued the LAFCO ANNEXATION expansion plans made over twenty years ago with which he was also personally involved.
WHAT SORT OF PEOPLE WOULD SELL RECENTLY DEVELOPED PUBLIC EMERGENCY DROUGHT GROUNDWATER TO THE SPECIAL INTERESTS OF SPECULATIVE REAL ESTATE AND LAND DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS which our LDPCSD has no legal duty or moral obligation to provide water?
?????? $$$$$$ ??????
Here’s a quick update on the most recent PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST:
November 12, 2018 at 1:00 p.m.
This Meeting replaces the November 19, 2018 Regular Board Meeting (PDF below…if this works – CONTROL PAGES BOTTOM LEFT IN DOCUMENT. YOU KNOW, I worry sometimes that I am only a sneeze away from forgetting how to do any of this! lol)
What better time to distract from the clear past COUNTY BETRAYAL and DECEIT already displayed for the<MR WECs>of the LAKE DON PEDRO residential subdivision?
Imagine, MARIPOSA COUNTY LAFCO waits a month after the STATE OF CALIFORNIA declares the Merced River water fully appropriated and being put to maximum beneficial use per the State Constitution to then quietly, and greatly, expand the water service area boundary for its new LAKE DON PEDRO CSD that is clearly far beyond what the California Public Utilities Commission was prepared to approve. In fact, the CPUC went to great lengths in that decision to clearly explain what properties were, and were not, to be provided water by the new LAFCO formed district. The reason for the last 38 years of that missing LAFCO SERVICE AREA MAP? Evidence of the deception?
Yup, in August 1980 LAFCO quietly enlarging the LDPCSD water service area (apparently re-confirmed in Kampa’s recent statement that Unit 7 was part of the Sierra Highlands residential subdivision and therefore, within his “interpretation of the WL11395 POU) only months before receiving the SIERRA HIGHLANDS WATER COMPANY facility and assets transfer approval from the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) in January 1981, effective February 1981?
The official service area map missing for over 38 years – despite the fact the 11 pages of metes and bounds survey still exist?
Refusal to provide that original area service map to other requesting government entities and individuals through the last almost four decades!
Missing MARIPOSA COUNTY LAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission) records on their internet page and refusal to reply to multiple FORMAL REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION REGARDING HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS ANNEXATIONS INTO THE LDPCSD?
A SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (SOI)boundary developed by LAFCO based on an in depth detailed report 7 years after LDPCSD formation without a service map (and after the logical ZERO SOI PROPOSED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) – A DETAILED SOI REPORT THAT DID NOT EVEN MENTION STATE WATER LICENSE 11395 restrictions on Merced River water use outside theLake Don Pedro residential subdivision (formerly Sierra Highlands Water Company subdivision)?
When LAFCO was approving many of these annexations please also remember the LDPCSD DID NOT HAVE A SINGLE GROUNDWATER WELL AT THE TIME FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE MERCED RIVER WATERILLEGALLY LEAVING THE SUBDIVISION/GOLF COURSE AREA!
In other words, LAFCO was approving annexations into the LDPCSD for development that the district could not possibly legally provide water and all these annexations were based on a “detailed” and contracted SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY REPORT (resulting in a huge SOI Boundary for properties and their “potential future water service”) that NEVER ONCE MENTIONED
IT WAS ILLEGAL TO PROVIDE MERCED RIVER WATER TO THOSE ANNEXATIONS!
FOLKS, THIS IS NORMALLY CALLED A BIG CLUE!
Please also consider….
A proposed “slumbering 900 acre residential subdivision across the street from the LDPCSD” that was acknowledged twenty years later and only a few months before PETE KAMPA/KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS / aka KAMPACS, unethical return and appointment as general manager without even a rudimentary background employment check? (Accomplished through a LAFCO – LDPCSD semi-closed meeting in Mariposa that I was repeatedly told I could not attend which just happened to result in a NEW LDPCSD SERVICE BOUNDARY THAT INCLUDED ONE OF KAMPA’s 20 year old LAFCO ANNEXATIONS REQUIRING an expensive GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM TO DEVELOP?
$
Granting Kampa unlimited access to over one million dollars in district funds accumulated due to the successful passage of a proposition 218 to avoid bankruptcy?
That million dollars was used to leverage state and federal grants in order to develop groundwater wells that the government and public were told would only be used for emergency drought purposes, yet was actually used to create a massive “ALTERNATE SOURCE OF WATER” with which to sell to the many LAFCO ANNEXATIONS OUTSIDE THEWATER LICENSE LEGAL PLACE OF USEPETE KAMPA SET UP OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO when starting his infamous water career in California?
Still waiting for the conclusion to the State Water Board investigationand Pete Kampa’s obvious attempted change of the WL11395 Place of Use Boundary (to include the annexations he pushed twenty years ago) for Merced River water with a fabricated incorrect boundary map Kampa submitted to the State Water Boardin defense of his wrongful activities?
(Kampa’s FAKE POU MAP was created with a Board approved $35,000 digital mapping project
while that same board steadfastly refused to simply contact the
State Water Boardor the Merced Irrigation District for an official WL11395 POU map!
How “single minded” and/or negligent is that one aspect to this mess?)
An acquiescent Board of Directors who despite years of requests by the public would not even simply pick up a telephone and request a legitimate POU map from….oops! repeating myself….lol
Yup, what a perfect time for Kampa and Kompany to schedule a Special Meeting (cancelling the regular meeting with its procedures and routine production of public information) to discuss another financial deception and betrayal by the county and LDPCSD “remote management”.
My best to you and yours, Lew
Especially since you have not been receiving the “best from the county (not even adequate)” – much less their co-operative ” and disingenuous part time manager” Pete Kampa & Kompany.
WE HAVE ENOUGH KAMPA KRAPA ALREADY
WITHOUT THAT
FINANCIAL LOSER
OF A SEWER TREATMENT PLANT!
Consider: LAFCO is not supposed to act arbitrarily or capriciously? Take a look at the LDPCSD’s 38 years of ridiculous annexations, islands of service, and groundless LAFCO decisions – that quite often do not even adhere to their own operating regulations! Check out the haphazard sub-par annexation paperwork – if you can get the county to provide the years of evidence still missing from their website!
WHAT ABOUT THE PAST LEACHATE DUMPING PRACTICE?
What about the county’s dumping of tanker truck loads full of toxic leachate from the Mariposa County Landfill into the Don Pedro wastewater facility when their leachate basins overfilled during heavy precipitation?
Is that what caused the premature damage and eventual replacement of wastewater plant equipment?
Will that LEACHATE transport-dumping procedure continue when necessary or was it just a temporary answer to a serious County problem that the Don Pedro facility was used to remedy while in the county’s control?
there is soooooooo much more to this betrayal ……but I have ignored my own work long enough, later
(Don’t let that reading time estimate frighten you as it refers to the entire chronological “page” of whatever posted, not these individual updates, but of course if there is a video ???? lol Heck that reading time advisement almost scared me off from a proof read! lol Still learning new version.)
BOO!
THURSDAY OCTOBER 31ST, 2019 (HALLOWEEN)
HERE IS THE OCTOBER 21ST, 2019 LDPCSD MONTHLY BOARD MEETING AUDIO RECORDING. SURE IS A SHAME THAT OUR NEW GENERAL MANAGER/BOARD TREASURER, PATRICK McGOWAN,
[WHO BY ALL APPEARANCES CERTAINLY SEEMS TO BE DOING A GREAT JOB CLEANING UP THE HORRIBLE MESS LEFT BY PETER KAMPA — COMPLIMENTS OF HIS DO NOTHING “BOBBLE HEADED YES NODDING BOARD OF DEFECTORS” WHO COULD NOT EVEN ASK A SIMPLE QUESTION AS TO THE LEGALITY OF THEIR PUSH TO EXPAND A SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION SPECIAL BENEFIT WATER SERVICE FOR LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES KAMPA WRONGFULLY SET UP 20 YEARS AGO WITH PUBLIC GRANT FUNDS OBTAINED FROM THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTENDED FOR EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF OF LEGAL CUSTOMERS AND NOT EXPANDING SPECIAL BENEFIT SUBSIDIZED NEW WATER SERVICES]
IS NOW BEING “SETUP” AS THE ANSWER PERSON FOR ALL THE NEFARIOUS ACTIVITIES TAKING PLACE AT THE LDPCSD WITH WHICH HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO INVOLVEMENT!
SYNDIE MARCHSIELLO HAS BEEN THE OFFICE MANAGER AND BOARD SECRETARY FOR MANY YEARS NOW AND HAS BEEN PRIVY TO ALL OFFICIAL PAPERWORK CONCERNING OUR LAKE DON PEDRO CSD. THIS IS AN ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT FACT REGARDING THE TRADITIONAL PROCESSING OF ANNEXATION PAPERWORK THROUGH MARIPOSA AND TUOLUMNE COUNTY LAFCOS TO ADD OUTSIDE MIDPOU PROPERTIES INTO OUR DISTRICT SERVICE BOUNDARIES.
UNFORTUNATELY, MY PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST SUBMITTED BACK IN APRIL OF THIS YEAR FOR THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT (MID) “SHAPE FILE MAPS” WHICH PETE KAMPA STATED HAD BEEN PROVIDED BY THE MID ENGINEERS AS EVIDENCE OF THE OFFICIAL PLACE OF USE (POU) CHANGE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER PER WATER LICENSE 11395 (HELD BY THE MID INCIDENTALLY), HAS NEVER BEEN PROVIDED.
TWICE I HAVE PAID MONEY FOR INCOMPLETE RESPONSES MISSING ONLY THIS MOST IMPORTANT AND CRITICAL PIECE OF INFORMATION CONCERNING KAMPA’S GROUNDWATER SCAM REQUIRING AN ILLEGAL CHANGE IN THE LEGITIMATE POU OF WL11395.
THIS IS PUBLIC INFORMATION THAT WAS APPARENTLY (AND INTENTIONALLY) WRONGFULLY USED BY OUR FORMER GM/TREASURER PETER KAMPA TO COMPLETELY MISREPRESENT THE LEGAL POU BOUNDARY IN FAVOR OF ONE WHICH SUPPORTED HIS PROPOSED EXPANSION OF GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION TO MANY MORE LAFCO ANNEXATIONS INTO THE DISTRICT WHICH THEMSELVES, VIOLATE THE VERY LAFCO RULES SET UP TO PREVENT SUCH MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES INTENDED FOR OUR SPECIAL DISTRICT.
YES, THE LDPCSD IS A SPECIAL DISTRICTTHAT HAS BEEN CORRUPTED AND MANIPULATED FOR DECADES THANKS TO THE DUPLICITOUS EFFORTS OF A CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION (CSDA) 20 YEAR BOARD MEMBER NAMED PETE KAMPA. OBVIOUSLY, SUCH CORRUPTION COULD NOT TAKE PLACE WITHOUT CONTINUED SUPPORT FROM LOCAL INDIVIDUALS IN BOTH THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR.
SO, WHY IS A GENERAL MANAGER WHO IS APPARENTLY DOING EXACTLY WHAT HAS NEEDED TO BE DONE HERE IN LAKE DON PEDRO FOR DECADES (AKA, HONESTLY TAKING CARE OF OUR DISTRICT, INFRASTRUCTURE, EQUIPMENT, ETC.) WRONGFULLY BEING SADDLED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ANSWERING FOR BLATANT DISTRICT CORRUPTION AND “LEGAL CUSTOMER” BETRAYAL (aka THE MR WECS – MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS OF THE LDP SUBDIVISION) WHICH OCCURRED LONG BEFORE HE WAS APPOINTED GM?
WHY IS THIS GM WHO HAS ALREADY MADE NUMEROUS IMPROVEMENTS, REPAIRS AND PLANNED REPLACEMENT OF CRITICAL EQUIPMENT BEING SABOTAGED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH DISTRICT PAPERWORK AND OFFICIAL RECORDS?
MOST WOULD RECOGNIZE THIS BUSINESS SCAM AS
“PASSING THE BUCK”!
OUR OFFICE MANAGER/BOARD SECRETARY RECEIVES VALUABLE COMPENSATION FOR HER LDPCSD EMPLOYMENT ALONG WITH MUCH EXPERT TRAINING BY ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS THE CSDA (WHERE KAMPA HAS BEEN A BOARD DIRECTOR FOR 20 YEARS – IS THIS A CLUE AS TO THE CSDA’S ACTUAL MISSION?), YET EVEN WITH THE EXCEPTIONAL PAY SCALE FOR THIS AREA AND SPECIALIZED TRAINING (SUPPOSEDLY FOR EFFICIENCY), SHE APPARENTLY REFUSES, OR IS INCAPABLE FOR SOME REASON, TO PROVIDE PUBLIC INFORMATION WHICH EVERY CUSTOMER HAS A RIGHT TO REVIEW AND UNDERSTAND. WHY?
RECENTLY THE OFFICE MANAGER/BOARD SECRETARY RESPONDED TO ANOTHER FOLLOWUP REPEATED REQUEST FOR THE SAME “MID SHAPE FILE MAPS” BUT THIS TIME SYNDIE INSTRUCTED ME TO NOW CONTACT OUR NEW GM FOR THE INFORMATION! ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT MY FRIENDS.
EXCUSE ME, BUT FOR WHAT IS OUR OFFICE MANAGER/BOARD SECRETARY ALREADY BEING PAID AND TRAINED TO DO? WORK FOR THE DISTRICT AND ITS LEGAL CUSTOMERS? OR WORK FOR THE CSDA IN CONCEALING THE CORRUPTION THEIR 20 YEAR BOARD DIRECTOR HAS PERPETRATED HERE IN LAKE DON PEDRO FOR DECADES? CAN YOU IMAGINE THE WASTED PUBLIC FUNDS ALL THESE YEARS? THE ADDED COSTS TO YOUR WATER BILL? AND NOW THEY HAVE THE AUDACITY TO PROPOSE A RATE AND FEE INCREASES WHILE STILL NOT PERFORMING DUTIES AS REQUIRED BY LAW, MUCH LESS ADMITTING TO THEIR OUTRAGEOUS FAILURES TO SIMPLY FOLLOW CLEAR WATER USE RESTRICTIONS IN THE WATER LICENSE FOR DECADES?
SYNDIE MARCHESIELLO IS IN CHARGE OF DISTRICT RECORDS AND IS INTIMATELY INVOLVED WITH THE PAPERWORK PROCESS OF OUR DISTRICT OPERATION – WHY IS OUR NEW GM (WHO HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH ON HIS PLATE ALREADY WITH THE YEARS OF DISTRICT NEGLECT HAVING ALREADY TAKEN PLACE) BEING REQUIRED TO ANSWER FOR THE CORRUPTION AND NEGLIGENCE OF OTHERS?
I BELIEVE THIS IS JUST ONE MORE VARIABLE AS TO WHY THIS DISTRICT CANNOT HOLD ON TO GOOD RELIABLE EMPLOYEES FOR VERY LONG…..THEY SIMPLY GET BURNED OUT WITH ALL THE NEEDLESS CORRECTIVE WORK WHICH OTHER EMPLOYEES REFUSE TO PERFORM FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER AND SIMPLY PASS ON TO THE “NEW VICTIM GM”!
WE NEED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS ABSOLUTE FAILURE BEFORE WE END UP ADVERTISING FOR YET ANOTHER GM WHO WILL ONLY EXPERIENCE THE SAME CORRUPTION AND REFUSAL TO PERFORM DUTIES BY OTHER EMPLOYEES – FOR WHAT EVER REASON.
IF THE LDPCSD OFFICE DOES NOT HAVE THESE RECORDS THE OFFICE MANAGER SHOULD STATE SO IN A RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST RATHER THAN WASTE EVERYONE’S TIME. AHHHHH, THAT IS CERTAINLY PART OF THE PLAN….BURN OUT THE REQUESTING PARTY AT THE SAME TIME WHILE THE TRUE CULPRITS GET AWAY WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY!
BUT I WONDER, WHY WOULD A LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY NOT POSSESS THE VERY MATERIAL SENT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN ANSWER TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF WATER RIGHTS? THE NOV WAS SENT TO THE LDPCSD, THE LDPCSD RESPONDED, WHY DOES THE OFFICE MANAGER REFUSE TO PROVIDE THIS REQUESTED INFORMATION?
HOW MUCH OF THIS LOCAL
GOVERNMENT AGENCY WAS ESSENTIALLY SOLD TO
PRIVATE BUSINESS CONCERNS?
WHAT ELSE MIGHT BE MISSING FROM OUR
OFFICIAL RECORDS TO CONCEAL THIS CHARADE OF A
LEGITIMATE PUBLIC AGENCY?
ANYWAY, THERE ARE STILL A FEW MORE DAYS ON THE 10 DAY RESPONSE PERIOD FOR MY MOST RECENT REQUEST – NOW MADE TO GM McGOWAN, BUT IT IS REALLY CURIOUS AS TO WHY OUR OFFICE MANAGER/BOARD SECRETARY HAS WASTED SO MUCH TIME IN REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH A SIMPLE PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST WHICH NOW BECOMES A NEEDLESS HEADACHE FOR SOMEONE NOT INVOLVED IN THIS MESS LIKE SHE HAS BEEN FOR MANY, MANY YEARS.
YES, I KNOW, GET AN ATTORNEY AND GO TO COURT – RIGHT? WRONG! CORRUPT OFFICIALS LOVE THAT BECAUSE IT DOESN’T COST THEM A THIN DIME (THEY HAVE ATTORNEYS PAID FOR WITH OUR PUBLIC FUNDS!) BUT CAN FINANCIALLY RUIN THE INNOCENT CITIZEN WHO IS ONLY REQUESTING WHAT THEY HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO OBTAIN AND REVIEW. ATTORNEYS?
PRIVATE FUNDED ATTORNEYS TO CHALLENGE CORRUPT
GOVERNMENT?
ANY PRO BONO ATTORNEYS
WILLING TO HELP?
I CANNOT FORGET WHAT THE DEERWOOD CORPORATION AND HARRY ALFIER OF LAKE DON PEDRO REALTY DID TO JIM AND MARION DEAN ON ALAMO DRIVE…..THEY LOST ALMOST 1/2 MILLION DOLLARS OF THEIR “GOLDEN YEARS RETIREMENT FUND” IN A MARIPOSA SUPERIOR COURT ACTION ONLY REQUESTING THE COUNTY AND STATE OBEY THEIR OWN ESTABLISHED REGULATIONS IN REGARDS TO THE 1991 SRA FIRE SAFE ROADWAY MINIMUM ROADWAY STANDARDS FOR THE LAKE DON PEDRO DESIGNATED HIGH FIRE SEVERITY ZONE!
AND WHAT IS AGAIN SEASONALLY HAPPENING RIGHT NOW IN CALIFORNIA?
WE ARE ON FIRE!
YUP, JIM AND MARION BOTH LEFT THIS WORLD WITHIN WEEKS OF EACH OTHER WITH SUCH NEEDLESS WORRIES WEIGHING ON THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS. ABSOLUTELY SHAMEFUL….AND FOR WHAT? PURE CORRUPTION OF A SYSTEM INTENDED TO PROTECT THOSE IT ACTUALLY VICTIMIZES WHILE BURNING THROUGH PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES TO PROTECT THE CONTINUING SPECIAL INTEREST CORRUPTION!
AND THEN WHAT? OH! BIG SURPRISE! THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT NEEDS MORE TAX DOLLARS TO COVERUP AND CONTINUE THE CORRUPTION WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPLAINING IT IS FOR THE CITIZEN’S BEST INTERESTS! WHAT A SCAM! (STILL WORKING ON WHAT I WILL WRITE ON MY PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT CHECK NEXT MONTH.)
NEWSOM/DICKEY BOOK
OH YEAH, ALMOST FORGOT….RECEIVED MY AMAZON BOOK “CITIZENVILLE HOW TO TAKE THE TOWN SQUARE DIGITAL AND REINVENT GOVERNMENT” BY GAVIN NEWSOM WITH LISA DICKEY. PRETTY MUCH WHAT I EXPECTED. I’M OVER HALF WAY THROUGH AND HONESTLY NOT SURE IF I WILL FIND THE TIME TO FINISH IT AS IT IS A TYPICAL DEMOCRAT “FEEL GOOD STORY” OF GOOD SOUNDING IDEAS BUT WITHOUT THE REAL LIFE UGLINESS OF WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS WHEN UTILIZED.
ESSENTIALLY THE BOOK ENCOURAGES THE GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC AND ALLOW THE PUBLIC TO COME UP WITH INNOVATIVE IDEAS TO ASSIST GOVERNMENT AND HELP CITIZENS. NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT, BUT IT IGNORES WHAT OFTEN HAPPENS TO GOOD IDEAS IN THE WRONG HANDS.
FOR EXAMPLE, NEWSOM WROTE ABOUT HOW TECHNOLOGY PERMITTED EASY DONATIONS FOR THE HAITI EARTHQUAKE RELIEF FUND BY SIMPLY TEXTING THE WORD “HAITI” TO A DEDICATED NUMBER AND THE DONATION WOULD APPEAR ON THEIR NEXT CELL-PHONE BILL WITHOUT ALL THE HASSLE OF TRADITIONAL DONATION EMAILS, TELEPHONE CALLS, BANKING INFORMATION EXCHANGE, ETC.
THIS “EASY DONATION” THROUGH MOBILE DEVICES WAS CREATED BY ALEC ROSS WHO WAS A “SENIOR ADVISOR FOR INNOVATION” TO SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON. HE ALSO WORKED FOR BARACK OBAMA’S 2008 CAMPAIGN AND JOINED THE STATE DEPARTMENT LATER IN APRIL 2009. THE ROSS GOAL WAS TO USE NEW TECHNOLOGY IN THE FORM OF MOBILE PHONES AND SOCIAL NETWORKS TO FURTHER US DIPLOMACY.
HRC SUPPORTED THE ROSS CONCEPT TO THE POINT, ROSS CALLED HRC THE “GODMOTHER OF TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY STATECRAFT”.
GOOD LORD, ROSS WAS VERY CLOSE TO A PERFECT DESCRIPTION – ONLY MISSING ONE WORD…..
“GODMOTHER OF TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY STATECRAFT CORRUPTION“
2 MILLION AMERICANS DURING THE FIRST FIVE DAYS OF THE EMERGENCY IN HAITI RAISED OVER $22 MILLION – EVERYONE WAS TEXTING FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO HELP WITH THE DISASTER – ALL SOUNDS GOOD YEAH? (AMERICANS ARE TRADITIONALLY VERY COMPASSIONATE AND GENEROUS WHEN IT COMES TO SUCH EMERGENCIES IN OTHER COUNTRIES) – BUT WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED WITH ALL THAT MONEY DONATED? SUPPOSEDLY FOR HAITI RELIEF?
EVER HEAR OF THE BOOK “CLINTON CASH” BY PETER SCHWEITZER? JUST ORDERED ONE. MY UNDERSTANDING FROM TELEVISION NEWS IS ONLY SOMETHING LIKE 10% OF THE DONATIONS ACTUALLY MADE IT TO HAITI TO HELP THE VICTIMS OF THAT EARTHQUAKE. THE REST WAS USED BY THE CLINTON FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF ITS QUESTIONABLE POLITICAL AND PRIVATE GOALS!
TRUE, THAT DOESN’T MAKE THE IDEA BAD IN ITSELF, BUT THERE IS ALWAYS SOMEONE WHO WILL PERVERT A GOOD IDEA OR INTENTION INTO SELF ENRICHMENT BECAUSE OF GREED OR SPECIAL INTEREST.
(EXAMPLE: WHAT COULD BE WRONG WITH USING GOVERNMENT GRANTS TO DEVELOP EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER WELLS IN A DROUGHT PRONE AREA DURING A SEVERE MULTI-YEAR STATE DROUGHT? ENTER PETE KAMPA AND HIS FAKE WL11395 POU MAP AND “PET LAFCO PROJECTS” FROM 20 YEARS AGO FOR THE EXPLANATION! THE TRUE EVIL PURPOSE MUST BE CONCEALED FROM THE PUBLIC BECAUSE IT IS A “SIMPLE CHEAT”.)
SO MUCH OF THIS IS ONLY NOW BEING PUBLICIZED. HRC AND SOCIAL MEDIA? LOL LORD KNOWS HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WERE KILLED, HARMED AND/OR EXPERIENCED SERIOUS LOSS AS A RESULT OF HER OUTRAGEOUS AND LACKADAISICAL APPROACH TO CONFIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION ON HER MOBILE DEVICES WHILE “ACTING” AS SECRETARY OF STATE? OOPS! I ALMOST FORGOT “CRIMINAL” WHICH I BELIEVE IT CERTAINLY WAS AS HRC IS NOT A DUMMY BUT A PROFESSIONAL AND CALCULATING CHEAT.
(OH….BUT TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR CLEANING UP THE SWAMP BY ASKING LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAINING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON? SIMILARLY – THAT WAS THE REASON I DECIDED NOT TO RUN FOR AN LDPCSD DIRECTOR POSITION AGAIN —
A GRAND JURY FOREMAN …..
(FROM THE JURY THAT STARTED OUT GREAT THEN SUDDENLY EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL CHANGES THAT SHIFTED FOCUS AWAY FROM THE CRIMINAL PERPETRATORS! WOW! JUST LIKE THE SWRCB INVESTIGATION THAT STARTED OUT VERY PROFESSIONAL BUT AFTER A “PERSONNEL CHANGE” WAS CORRUPTED INTO A MOCKERY OF LEGITIMATE INVESTIGATION THANKS TO WHAT I BELIEVE ARE “KAMPA OPERATIVES/AGENTS” WITHIN THE SWRCB DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS RUNNING INTERFERENCE FOR THIS APPARENT MARIPOSA/TUOLUMNE COUNTY SUPPORTED FOOTHILL WATER SCAM FOR LAFCO (LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION) ANNEXATIONS CURIOUSLY PLACED WITHIN LDPCSD SERVICE BOUNDARIES IN COMPLETE VIOLATION OF THEIR OWN OPERATING REGULATIONS!)
…….CLEARLY ADVISED THAT I WOULD HAVE TO GIVE UP MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH ON THIS WEBSITE IN ORDER TO BE A PUBLIC OFFICIAL AGAIN – WHICH ALTHOUGH ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT AND ILLEGAL – STILL ILLUMINATED TO ME WHAT I WAS UP AGAINST – DIRECT MARIPOSA COUNTY INVOLVEMENT WITH THE LDPCSD CORRUPTION!
THAT GJ FOREMAN WAS A RETIRED CHP OFFICER SERVING ON THAT GRAND JURY WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL WHO IS NOW APPARENTLY A SITTING SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE! SINCE THE FOREMAN ADVISED HE PERSONALLY ATTEMPTED TO HAVE CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST ME THROUGH THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (WHICH WAS A LUDICROUS CONCEPT TO BEGIN WITH) I NOW SERIOUSLY WONDER IF THERE WAS COLLABORATION AND SUPPORT FOR THAT NEFARIOUS ENDEAVOR FOR A “PREEMPTIVE RESTRICTION TO FREE SPEECH” FROM THAT NOW SITTING SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE? DEAR GOD I SURE HOPE NOT- BUT WHO KNOWS? HECK, MAYBE THERE IS ANOTHER PERSON WITH THE SAME IDENTICAL NAME? REGARDLESS, I FIGURED I COULD DO MORE GOOD OUTSIDE THE LDPCSD WITH LAKEDONPEDRO.ORG THAN CONSTRAINED WITHIN THAT CORRUPT PUBLIC AGENCY CLEARLY RECEIVING SUPPORT FROM TWO BENEFITING COUNTY GOVERNMENTS. BESIDES, WHEN I WAS LEAVING THE BOARD AND KAMPA WAS BEING BROUGHT IN (WITHOUT EVEN A SIMPLE BACKGROUND CHECK WHICH WOULD HAVE REVEALED HIS PRIOR 20 YEAR LAFCO ANNEXATION SETUPS) IT WAS AN “ALL CLEAR” SIGN FOR EMERY ROSS AND DANNY JOHNSON TO PURSUE THEIR NEFARIOUS GROUNDWATER SCAM UNCHALLENGED BY A ANOTHER SITTING DIRECTOR CLEARLY OPPOSED TO SUCH ILLEGAL SHENANIGANS. WHEN CHEATS BELIEVE NO ONE IS WATCHING THEY BECOME VERY BRAVE WITH THEIR DISHONEST PURSUITS.
ANYWAY, IT WAS AN OK BOOK I GUESS (NEWSOM & DICKEY) I’LL PROBABLY FINISH IT SOME DAY WHEN I HAVE MORE TIME AFTER RECEIVING MY REQUESTED PUBLIC INFORMATION! LOL (GET IT? NEVER GET THE PUBLIC INFORMATION – WON’T BOTHER FINISHING THE BOOK!)
A NEWSOM BOOK ABOUT GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY WITH PUBLIC INFORMATION? SOUNDS LIKE THE SETUP FOR A BAD JOKE, YEAH? WELL IT IS- AND IT’S CALLED
THE CURRENT STATE OF
CALIFUSION
ON THIS WEBSITE!
PERHAPS GOVERNOR NEWSOM SHOULD SEND COPIES OF HIS BOOK TO MARIPOSA COUNTY LAFCO AND THE LAKE DON PEDRO CSD? MAYBE HIS OWN STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SWRCB) AS THEY APPARENTLY STILL BELIEVE THE MERCED RIVER RUNS THROUGH SUTTER COUNTY WAY UP NORTH? (WHY IS THAT MISINFORMATION-DISINFORMATION STILL ON THE SWRCB WATER RIGHTS COMPLAINT WEBPAGE DESPITE MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS FOR CORRECTION?)
MAYBE THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES THAT SOMEHOW ALREADY HAD THAT FAKE KAMPA MIDPOU MAP ON FILE IN THEIR RECORDS COULD BENEFIT FROM THE NEWSOM/DICKEY SUGGESTIONS OF OPENING UP PUBLIC INFORMATION? HOW DID THAT BAD INFORMATION RETENTION HAPPEN TO COME ABOUT ANYWAY? (REM? WHEN THE SWRCB STARTED THAT EXCELLENT INVESTIGATION – WHICH WAS LATER QUICKLY CORRUPTED – THEY (SWRCB) OBTAINED THAT INCORRECT INFORMATION FROM ANOTHER STATE WATER AGENCY! HOW?) PERHAPS NEWSOM’S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – HEADED BY AN ATTORNEY GENERAL INVOLVED WITH THE WASHINGTON DC MISSING DNC SERVER MIGHT BENEFIT FROM HIS WORDS OF WISDOM IN THAT BOOK ABOUT FREE INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND THE RESULTING BENEFITS TO SOCIETY? BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ….JUST NICE SOUNDING WORDS WITH NO HONEST INTENT TO MAKE IT HAPPEN – A SHAM TO DISTRACT FROM THE IMPORTANT ISSUES.
MERELY TALKING ABOUT “GOOD STUFF” IS A FAR CRY FROM “MAKING IT HAPPEN” AND A LOT OF REALLY “BAD STUFF” OFTEN OCCURS IN BETWEEN, WHICH WHEN DISCOVERED BY THE PUBLIC, IS QUICKLY COVERED UP AND LATER DESTROYED (LIKE IN SIMPLY “WIPING OFF A DISK WITH A CLOTH” – LOL) AS THE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION THAT IT IS.
NO, I DID NOT SEE ANY EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED TO PETER KAMPA IN THE NEWSOM/DICKEY BOOK ON HOW TO CREATE A FAKE WL11395 DIGITAL POU MAP AND USE IT TO REPLACE THE OFFICIAL “HARD COPY” SWRCB MAP ON FILE IN SACRAMENTO IN KAMPA’S ATTEMPT TO LEGITIMIZE EXISTING AND PROPOSED ILLEGAL WATER CONNECTIONS, BUT AS ALWAYS, HINTS ARE EVERYWHERE FOR A DISHONEST PERSON TO UTILIZE OTHERWISE INNOCENT INFORMATION FOR CORRUPT PURPOSES – AND THAT IS SOMETHING PETE KAMPA MIGHT CONSIDER WRITING ABOUT IN HIS OWN BOOK AS AN EXPERT. PERSONALLY I BELIEVE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHOULD PROVIDE KAMPA WITH PLENTY OF “QUIET TIME” TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH A PROJECT IF DESIRED.
MY BEST TO YOU AND YOURS, LEW
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 23rd, 2019
Sunday, October 13th, 2019
Still think that advisory statement by PETER NAVARRO (trade
advisor to President Trump) was brilliant.
Every time you hear the term “IMPEACHMENT”, – LISTEN to the SIGNAL and IGNORE THE
NOISE! I thought about adding – Listen
to the SIGNAL (“KEEPING AMERICA GREAT”), and ignore the NOISE
(“ONLY USED TO DELAY and WAIT”) but decided not to complicate that
“clean statement” any further.
Heck, as it is I used the wrong recording for uploading that left out
the word “and” lol. My best to you and yours, Lew
FRIDAY, October 11th, 2019/1015 hrs +/-
POWER BACK ON!
Sitting in the darkness
Breathing forest smoke
Same as when I went to sleep
And this morning when I awoke
Inconvenient but tolerable
“Cheat camping” right at home
By way of portable gas generator
And a working rotary phone
Less than two days, no biggie
Everyday many live with much less
Good reminder how fortunate we are
Despite citizen political distress
but…….
Consider a LEFT
PARTY that controlled everything
Especially our communications and power
Subject to shut
down anytime it wanted
Compelling citizens to vote as desired
What’s the
difference with these LEFT PROTESTS?
Shutting down
colleges, businesses, and traffic
Unilaterally demand
attention from others
Grownup
tantrums with “baby-like colic”.
MBTY&Y, Lew
Wednesday, October 9th, 2019
GOT TO GO JUST LOST POWER AND BATTERY ONLY LAST SO LONG 1532hrs
iT’S BACK, 1533, OFF AGAIN, LATER!
ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT!
LISTEN TO THE SIGNAL AND IGNORE THE NOISE!
Started the normal routine – a “good morning conversation” regarding our agenda for the day with Liz (my German Shepherd Dog) at the foot of the bed. Liz often triggers this wake up routine with very soft SIGNALS usually consisting of subdued whines and a playful tail thumping. After our “good morning” acknowledgements I locate the television remote that is concealed somewhere to the right within bedding sheets and blankets where it was abandoned when previously drifting off to sleep.
Turning on the television this morning I heard an unfamiliar voice on the OAN (ONE AMERICAN NEWS) morning report (President Trump Trade Advisor PETER NAVARRO) making a statement which immediately caught my attention. His statement was EXQUISITELY SIMPLE, EXPLANATORY, LOGICAL, and ENCOURAGED EXACTLY WHAT AMERICAN PATRIOTS HAVE BEEN DOING ANYWAY (supporting our duly elected President of the United States and his administration).
“Listen to the signal and
ignore the noise”.
WOW. Obviously this could mean different things to different people, but I think it a great slogan to assist others in sifting through the garbage in recognizing the
SIGNAL OF POSITIVE ACTIVITY FOR OUR COUNTRY
over the actual dangers and threats posed by the DEMO-LEFT that are
camouflaged in the distracting
NOISE OF A FRAUDULENT IMPEACHMENT.
Yup, short and sweet. Directly to the point while simultaneously clarifying the disgusting activities of the DEMOCRAT LEFT whose refusal to properly discharge their elected duties have derailed our system of law and justice – which were specifically designed to protect all citizens in this great country. Mr. NAVARRO delivered that brilliant message with an exquisite style as well.
So, will the American Public ultimately be extremely disappointed with yet another SENATOR PELOSI decision based on a DEMOCRAT-SOCIALIST-LEFT political agenda and not what is best for OUR UNITED STATES of AMERICA and her citizens? REM: That’s ALL US CITIZENS REGARDLESS OF OUR WONDERFULLY DIVERSE CHARACTERISTICS AS INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE WE ARE A FAMILY OF USA CITIZENS AND OUR “COLLECTIVE HOME” AS A COUNTRY IS BEING THREATENED. Enough blah, blah, blah – listen for yourself, what do you think?
I also wanted to post that video comment by (Dem, Tx) AL GREEN so you could hear it for yourself, but unlike all the Anti-Trump “guerilla style short video shots” the media FORCE FEEDS THE PUBLIC, apparently it was decided such “agenda clear video snippets” from the DEM-LEFT should be much more difficult to obtain and share with others. So, this (below gigantic link) is the best I could find on the subject of the AL GREEN comment. (I don’t care the PARAGRAPH SIZED LINK might look bad on the webpage, heck, the information is far more important than appearance.)
You know, I can understand the desperate attempt to lessen the impact of this very clear and illuminating comment as to the actual reason for this continuing charade of a legitimate impeachment process. All that “for the people” rationalization is just plain “NOISE” and is intended to almost hypnotize one into ignoring or forgetting the primary purpose of this fraud of an impeachment:
I also wanted to post that video comment by (Dem, Tx) AL GREEN so you could hear it for yourself, but unlike all the Anti-Trump “guerilla style short video shots” the media FORCE FEEDS THE PUBLIC, apparently it was decided such “agenda clear video snippets” from the DEM-LEFT should be much more difficult to obtain and share with others. So, this (below gigantic link) is the best I could find on the subject of the AL GREEN comment. (I don’t care the PARAGRAPH SIZED LINK might look bad on the webpage, heck, the information is far more important than appearance.)
You know, I can understand the desperate attempt to lessen the impact of this very clear and illuminating comment as to the actual reason for this continuing charade of a legitimate impeachment process. All that “for the people” rationalization is just plain “NOISE” and is intended to almost hypnotize one into ignoring or forgetting the primary purpose of this fraud of an impeachment:
“I’m concerned if we don’t impeach this president he will get re-elected”
The DEM LEFT is quite aware of their increasing lack of credibility and integrity and more people everyday are waking up and discovering their once beloved and respected Democrat party has been hi-jacked by a highly organized group of unethical cheats and liars determined to destroy OUR AMERICA as we have known it since the beginning.
Anyway, you’ll have to listen to a few minutes of the “AL GREEN NOISE” before getting to the meat of his comment at 1 min 43 seconds.
Interesting, yeah? So much of what Al Green said those few months ago has since already been proven absolutely wrong! Good Heavens. The Mueller Report? lol. FBI biased investigations? Set ups with international spies? IRS targeting DEM opposition? The Russian hoax against Trump? It just never ends – why would it when only evil imagination is required by the LEFT? Wow!
Is it not interesting as to how all these DEMO-LEFT POLITICIANS continually interject what TRUMP, will or will not do? What Trump does, or does not mean when he speaks? Geez, if we listened to the DEMO-LEFT ???—- remember all the guarantees that THERE WAS NO POSSIBLE AVENUE THAT WOULD PERMIT TRUMP TO BE ELECTED PRESIDENT. Well, there you go. Dem-Left has been wrong since day one.
Green refers to himself as the canary in the coal mine (a time when live birds were taken into mines to see if they would die due to harmful gases present. If they lived it was OK for humans to go down there and work, if they died? Get another canary.) WHAT? AL GREEN, a canary? lol Keeping with that coal mine example, if anything, AL GREEN is more like an ignition source for the traditional flammable gases in mines! (Which many Demo-Left politicians are full of incidentally …. hot expanding flammable gas! lol)
Also, using that quote by the Rev. Martin Luther King and taking it OUT OF CONTEXT in an attempt to conceal the DEM-LEFT FABRICATED IMPEACHMENT PROCESS as a coup d’ etat to remove PRESIDENT TRUMP, is an insult to that positive observation which is often shorthanded into “doing the right thing”.
(Boy I like that PETE NAVARRO COMMENT ON OAN this morning!)
Personally I believe that statement should be a conservative talking point that gets hammered like a nail as often as possible!
PLEASE do not forget, although
IMPEACHMENT MAY BE THE NOISE
in reality it is a DEMOCRAT LEFT ATTEMPT
at a COUP D’ ETAT* of OUR PRESIDENT !
(REALIZE ALSO THERE IS A “POSITIVE SIMULTANEOUS SIGNAL” FOR PATRIOTS TO RECOGNIZE ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS AND CORRECTIONS ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED and TO INCREASE THIS UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORT FOR OUR PRESIDENT BY ASSISTING OTHERS IN IDENTIFYING and IGNORING THIS DEMO-LEFT CALCULATED NOISE TO DECEIVE THE AMERICAN VOTER!)
(Naturally your political party does not matter – only a true heart, mind and a willingness to learn the facts and do what is BEST FOR AMERICA!)
*Though certainly not the traditional coup d’ etat (later) make no mistake many American Patriots have been victims of this criminal conspiracy resulting in unwarranted injury and harm by the very institutions they supported and defended for decades with integrity and honor.
SO, WHY IMPEACH?
DEM-LEFT couldn’t beat him in 2016
EVEN WITH THEIR RIGGED ELECTION
so THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES use a
FABRICATED BASIS FOR WRONGFUL IMPEACHMENT!
aka
FAKE IMPEACHMENT =
UNETHICAL ATTEMPT AT A
COUP D’ ETAT!
True, fairly bloodless when compared with the original and literal, “off with their heads political change” meaning of the past but make no mistake blood has been shed as a result of this DEMO-LEFT CORRUPTION within government. Also realize this “over throw plan” did not just begin with the Trump election – but is the result of an incremental process of infiltration and obstructionism spanning decades which has festered within many areas of American society.
WELL EDUCATED? THE DEMO-LEFT IS JUST THE OPPOSITE ONCE AGAIN.
Many point to our failing educational system as a primary factor in creating and maintaining this nightmare of DEMO-LEFT DYSFUNCTION supported and advanced through MEDIA PROPAGANDA SERVICES – consider: Even highly educated people are on the streets protesting and ranting to abolish (are you ready?) OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH! crazy yeah? For some reason this makes me think of a defiant fish demanding to have the water drained from its tank! lol
Yesterday I saw a news report where even the Secretary of Homeland Security was shouted down by protestors and occurred at, of all places, the Georgetown Law School. WHAT? Check it out….
These are our future legally trained scholars and leaders of our country in both the private and government realm? People you may have to trust with your life, property and freedom? So sure their perspective is the only reasonable way to proceed they DESTROY AN IMPORTANT OPPORTUNITY (regardless of current immigration pro or con perspective) FOR THOSE INTERESTED STUDENTS TO HAVE A MEANINGFUL DIALOG? Why? Because they believe “The time is always right to do right” so they shout down a high ranking government representative who was there to discuss and answer legitimate questions about immigration and related matters?
BELIEVING ONE IS RIGHT, DOES NOT MAKE THEM RIGHT.
How many viewers truly believe this is the type of situation the Rev. Martin Luther King envisioned when he made the observation of “doing the right thing”?
Heck, even current CA Governor Gavin Newsom attempted to prevent Trump from being on the ballot in California! He was going to violate the Constitutional Rights of every Californian who would vote for Trump because only his DEMO-LEFT OPINION was controlling! How frigg’n arrogant is that? Sound like freedom to you? Or a dictatorship?
This is the Demo-Left. They say one thing about “FOR THE PEOPLE” then do exactly the opposite by PREVENTING AND CONCEALING RELEVANT INFORMATION, OPTIONS, ALTERNATIVES even CITIZEN CHOICE while blaming President Trump for all that they do as spoiled brats pretending to have concern “FOR THE PEOPLE” as sincere advocates and protesters. They are fakes! Frauds! Imposters desperately trying to hold on to a power they wrongfully obtained through deceit and trickery.
No different than the screaming brats we’ve all observed in markets and stores…..uncontrolled children crying and screaming, ranting, throwing stuff, rolling and flopping around on the dirty store floor pounding at the ground with their tightly clenched little fists, demanding their candy, cookies, soda pop, whatever…… just generally pitching a big public display as the spoiled brat they are who can only win in such situation by way of uncontrolled tantrum. The parent gives in JUST TO MAKE IT STOP!!!
Oh well, guess it works for some folks since they can still obviously grow up (at least physically) and become self-important DEMO-LEFT political officials in the House of Representatives. Or crooked FBI agents. Or international double-triple spies? Perhaps just run of the mill everyday TRAITORS TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HER CITIZENS?
Sadly, such behavior apparently works even in a top law school environment because it has failed to exercise reasonable control over their own facility. (Conservative parents paying tuition might have a thing to say about their children being denied such a great opportunity to interact with a top US government representative. Think of the public funded time and resources that were wasted on that otherwise positive attempt to “educate” legal scholars?)
So these rude flopping around crying babies got their candy….(no meaningful exchange between the scheduled speaker and students interested in something other than making fools of themselves) because, RIGHTLY SO I MIND YOU, the Secretary had more important things to do than stand there as a target of a bunch of still ignorant and rude “baby like” activists yelling and chanting at him. Frankly, I would have left long before that – so I do admire his patience. (hum, maybe their Democrat Left activist parents should have eaten them as babies before they cried their way into higher educational environments? lol)
Also, with all the conversations about the legitimate use of guns in public and private educational facilities to protect students from would be insane killers, I could not help but extend that concept just a little bit further in protecting our educational process. Like in the above law school situation, perhaps a few* well placed tranquilizer darts (delivered by trained and authorized school personnel) could have permitted that otherwise positive presentation to continue without further interruption while expulsion paperwork was completed in the administration office for all those participating in such childish tantrums? (If not a student, perhaps they could “wake up” for a nice breakfast provided by what ever correctional facility they were transferred while catching a few ZZZZZZs! lol
*I’d be willing to bet money, marbles or chalk after the first few protestors dropped for the “unscheduled rest period” (via tranquilizer darts) the rest of the herd would likely be a bit more attentive to the speaker, or at the very least, would quickly vacate the premises in order to avoid their appropriate, necessary, and long over-due “baby nap”.
My best to you and yours, Lew
HELLO! Tuesday, October 8th, 2019. Trying to prepare something for this page (differing from a regular “post”, with the last one being last July about the continuing water license misrepresentation). Anyway, hang on it will take a bit.
Any old Seinfeld fans out there? The following clip still cracks me up. Good ‘ol Elaine is bored at a social event and tired of hearing this woman going on about her fiancee, so for fun livens things up a bit. That mischievous look says it all – classic Elaine yeah?
Anyway, after hearing that news report the other day about the satirical “We must eat the babies” proposal to AOC during a public speaking engagement – well, I immediately thought of this episode of Seinfeld……
This is making me a nervous wreck! lol I haven’t used this new software version long enough to be screwing around with live data entry. Let’s see, was unsuccessful in snagging a URL for the “Eat the babies” video but I’m sure you can find it easily. Anyway, I was doing some other recording and in between the multiple attempts to get a part done correctly in “one take” saw this news report on OAN so was able to quickly audio record.
What did you folks think after hearing such a shocking proposal? My first thought was the poor woman had just walked away from some sort of a mental health care facility. Yet,….she had the time to have a nice T-shirt printed up with her baby eating message….? Perhaps multiple “walk a-ways” in preparation for her unique proposal in combating global climate change within the next few months? lol My second thought was, if she were not a resident somewhere, perhaps someone could compassionately assist her in possibly pursuing that avenue of exploration.
There may have been a few other “lightening bolts” of gray matter static connecting other “baby eating references” but Elaine’s was most certainly at the top of a short list.
Well, that didn’t work. Much to large of a file, OK then, into the LAME VIDEO….need to reconfigure some things…later!
OK THEN, let’s see, 1545hrs, not bad, uploaded and basically ready to go (for another incomplete project but I figure accomplishing some of it is better than sacrificing the whole idea to non action…right?)
Ever hear that expression “swatting at mosquitoes when up to your ass in alligators”, or variations such as “why swat mosquitoes when alligators are chewing on your ass”, ……? Well, if not, you’ll get an earful in my characteristic repetitive blah, blah, blah LAME format (Lew’s “Almost Music” Expression) for this mutated cross between “Maybe a Democrat Ate Your Baby” and a “Swatting At Mosquitoes” Democrat theme. Although I really tried to avoid accumulating so many files, I did it again never-the-less with some of the same resulting confusion. Anyway, here is the majority of the project – I need to wrap this up because although Liz has been very tolerant, her patience is growing thin! lol
“MAYBE A DEMOCRAT ATE YOUR BABY?”
GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS. Well, while trying to finish FAIL 2c4 USA FIN (“FIN” was supposed to designate the “FINAL REVISION” (what a joke! I have sooooooo many files with similar names I get confused. Why so many files? I’ve learned the hard way that sometimes a “best take” has been inadequately mixed with something else, so instead of having say, guitar and drums on the same clip (played together at the same time when recording), it is better to have a guitar clip laid over the drums for later playback and recording. Why? Necessary in editing, especially for non musicians like myself who spend and inordinate amount of time “HUNTING FOR A PARTICULAR NOTE” on the guitar or keyboard! LOL! I kid you not. When I hit a sour or bad note while recording (don’t even want to think about that ratio) I can sometimes “remove” it during editing while leaving the background drums. Yeah, kind of confusing when you have many different takes, with corresponding files and folders. Anyway, I screwed up late last night and confused file names and spent hours downloading/uploading the WRONG #$$%^&*! FILE!!! So, now what? Well, besides Liz being pissed and outdoor work piling up…… I must reluctantly return to this project which means trying to discover where the file names got mixed up. For example, the current posted video is “FAIL 2c4 USA FIN” but it has many brothers, sisters, cousins, blah, blah, blah….”FAIL 2c”, “FAIL 2C”, “FAIL 2c wbanjo”, “FAIL 2c4 USA”, “FAIL 2C$USA”, FAIL 2C YUdo this”, (lol). There is also the possibility that prior to uploading to YOUTUBE I inadvertently turned off some tracks while editing for the upload so the missing revisions still exist but I need to find the correct file and turn them on, produce the project, then upload again. Sorry. Lew
Absolutely disgusting what is transpiring within OUR GOVERNMENT under the camouflage of “Public service” by Democrat Socialist politicians, officials, DEEP STATE ACTIVISTS, and their assorted ilk along with the “necessary fuel” received from those who support such anti American activities. (Sad part is, PERHAPS NOT EVEN INTENTIONALLY, but rather due to a severe lack of accurate news from the traditional sources.
PLEASE! IF YOU VALUE AN INFORMED VOTE: CHECK OUT:
OAN: ONE AMERICA NEWS!
Anyway, having watched that ridiculous committee hearing about yet another FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER COMPLAINT against OUR PRESIDENT, the insulting questioning of OUR ACTING INTELLIGENCE CHIEF (JOSEPH MAGUIRE), and the LEFT’s REFUSAL TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE TRUTH, well, I was inspired to torture you folks with another LAME: [FAIL 2c4 USA (FIN) BELOW]. Yes it is a sort of therapy in a sense, well at least for me. You folks might required therapy after listening. lol
Yes once again it certainly appears that it is the DEMOCRATS who have actually been involved and committing the very violations of law and public trust of which they WRONGFULLY ACCUSE OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP! (Classic defense strategy of the guilty! Companion to the RED FLAG ATTACK: create a problem, blame another, offer solution to problem and regardless of outcome, profit from other people detrimentally relying upon the false information and assurances.)
I am know firmly convinced our NATION’S MOST DANGEROUS ENEMIES are working right here within OUR GOVERNMENT clad in a FAKE (CORRUPT) PUBLIC SERVICE facade.
Consider that for a moment.
Our military can effectively take care of whatever the world may throw at us on that front, but how do you EFFECTIVELY DEAL WITH DOMESTIC POLITICAL OBSTRUCTIONISM and TERRORIST TECHNIQUES USED AGAINST LEGITIMATE USA PATRIOTS? [Individuals/groups actively working WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT against YOUR/OUR COUNTRY’S BEST INTERESTS? aka, infiltrators, spies, disinformation & obstructionism experts – utilitizing (among other things) FALSE ACCUSATIONS OF WRONG DOING resulting in a variety of lengthy (costly) misguided (sham) investigations desparately fishing for any miniscule tidbit of information which could then be blown up into DEMOCRAT SOCIALIST FAKE TALKING POINT FOR FURTHER DISENGENUOUS LEFT POLITICAL ACTION!
“FAIL 2c4 USA FIN” offers a simple solution: SOCIALISTS OUT (because they fail to see for (take care of) the USA!) & COMMON SENSE IN (seriously, who is making more sense in these “MAKE BELIEVE ACCUSATIONS by Democrats” against President Trump?
How has America come to be in such a better position in only a few years? (DESPITE CONSTANT HARASSMENT AND OBSTRUCTION? IMAGINE WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE WITH SUPPORT (rather a lack of constant obstruction) FROM THE LEFT?
“GOOD NATIONAL NEWS” is a result of President Trump and his evolving administration! (EVOLVING IS GOOD – STAGNANT – like the Democrat Socialist LEFT is ALWAYS BAD. Stuck in that “old DEMO rut”, complete with smoking spinning tires but going nowhere.)
Extremely positive and multi dimensional achievements for our USA and CITIZENS are clear but constantly covered/concealed by the left with more FAKE & CORRUPT PROPAGANDA BY THE MAIN NEWS OUTLETS.
You know, I never watched those old Trump shows (Apprentice, etc) as I prefer truthful legitimate news with some thought provoking space science fiction for desert and balanced entertainment -(actually, there is often a valid cross over between the two! lol) but I’ve been wondering for some time now about this obvious contempt and hatred the left displays for the President. It is truly vicious. What causes such blind hatred? Could it be that some easily impressional folks who so disliked, were offended and/or outraged by those old Trump’s entertainment shows actually PASSED THEIR NEGATIVE FEELINGS, either by design or accident, to their growing families and younger friends and acquaintances? Could they have played a role in creating a core group of Trump Haters just because of some television shows they didn’t approve of or like? Who knows? Maybe they are now indeed proud parents and mentors of those ANTIFA ACTIVISTS (which itself is an oxymoron – rather like active arsonists advocating fire safety while burning down a community) who mask faces and disguise identities for the purpose of LAW VIOLATION in PROTEST TO “MADE UP ISSUES” by other comrades? Protests which include (but are not limited to) traffic obstruction, closure of public facilities, destruction of property, assault and battery on innocent nonviolent adversaries and bystanders – EVEN ACCOSTING ELDERLY WOMEN WITH WALKERS ON A STREET CROSSWALK! Yup, they (parents/mentors of the LEFT) must be very pleased and proud of what they have vicariously created through their own childish and immature television entertainment intolerance and bias. Just a thought. My best to you and yours, Lew
Wednesday, September 25, 2019
WAS IT ALWAYS LIKE THIS?
I really never had a great interest in, or experienced an attractive pull towards, political involvement other than the traditional attempt to stay informed (reading all election material presented in voter pamphlets) and always voting when provided the opportunity. Of course in my “later years” (due to concerns about the legal misdirection this area had experiienced, and was continuing to follow) did run as a candidate, was elected, and served on both, local private and public boards. Oh no, I assure you I am not forgetting being recalled with an entire board as well .
That was an excellent move by the land development/real estate backed group that ONLY orchestrated another TEMPORARY obstruction to this area finally reaching and being exposed to TRUTHFUL AND LEGAL FACT which had so meticulously been concealed for decades to preserve the ever increasing corruption of an entire community. Why? What is it usually?
Obtaining influential money/power and maintaining both – regardless of the obvious harm and detriment to those sacrificed for private third party profit. Guess who that usually is? That’s right! The “DEEP POCKET ALREADY VICTIMIZED PUBLIC”!!! After all, what can they do in response, quit paying taxes and imposed fees? Where will that get them? Nope.
Honest, truthful fact and accountability for those who intentionally violate public law for private profit is the only thing that will correct such continuing corruption.
Actually, I wear that RECALL as a BADGE OF HONOR considering who and why it was orchestrated! I had complete strangers for years apologize to me for falling prey to the absolute lies and carefully constructed disinformation spread by those SPECIAL INTERESTS – who are professionals at such deception. And I am a semi-hermit! lol!
What were we just listening to at the last LDPCSD meeting…..
“we were told we could get water too”!
Translation: SUBSIDIZED EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FOR THE SAME PRICE AS THOSE MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS WITHIN THE WATER LICENSE APPROVED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WHO ARE MANDATORY CUSTOMERS OF THE DISTRICT AND WHO MUST PAY ALL THE ADDITIONAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH SPECIAL BENEFIT WATER SERVICE OUR DISTRICT HAS NO LEGAL DUTY OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE THESE PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE PER WATER LICENSE 11395.
Anyway, the point I was trying to make was: I never wanted to be a politician and have never made any “living-wage money” from such participation other than the traditional $100/month stipend through the LDPCSD for directors attending a monthly board meeting.
Perhaps an antiquated view, but in my mind that $100 carried with it the responsibility (duty?) of reading all meeting preparation materials, ie, the AGENDA PACKET and related, attending all meetings, and understanding the material in order to make informed, reasonable, common sense decisions on behalf of the customers I served. Naturally all of the above assumes there are no SPECIAL INTERESTS POSSESSED BY DIRECTORS who might serve on a board. Unfortunately, there is no requirement that a director must possess the ability to read (or otherwise consume) the information, much less understand the same. This obligation to actually do the work is simply a personal choice.
So what is a special interest? Good question and there are all sorts of complicated legal definitions and interpretations to apply to ever widening situations (as people attempt to cheat the system more and more), but the term to which I reference is a common, reasonable person type general definition:
some personal/business interest or concern which might reasonably produce (whether by designed intent, likely outcome, chance, accident, happenstance etc.) a more favorable outcome to the side of the DECIDING INDIVIDUAL (family, friends, supporters, etc) OVER THAT OF THE INTENDED BENEFICIARY (the public).
Classic example, a town needs a new highway bypass yet local politicians orchestrate with planners and financial backers a much MORE EXPENSIVE and LESS EFFICIENT highway bypass through locations where the land required must be purchased by a family member, associate or other designated beneficiaries/recipients, rather than the cheaper, COMMON SENSE, and more accommodating land available for such project which would benefit the public and local taxpayers.
RESULT: The INTENDED BENEFICIARY WAS THE PUBLIC but they actually received a poorly designed, inconvenient, and very expensive lousy section of highway, but the “honest graft” (a term I picked up in a Public Administration course many years ago – intended to take the “STING” out of being perceived as just a common public law violator for profit) by those politicians benefited, not only, those selling “bypass land” for greatly exaggerated values – but also the value of all the adjacent properties to that project which would be re-zoned commercial to capitalize on the increased traffic patterns and sales potential. (Like a big rock thrown into a still pond, the financial rippling effects continue outward increasing property values in some areas, while perhaps decreasing them in others. Zoning, property uses, taxation, permitting, blah, blah, blah, lots of money to be made while going completely in the wrong direction of honest public benefit and service.
ANYWAY….. not a politician, but due to continued schooling and public service employment I was informed on most general political topics, but I’ve noticed something lately and do not recall it existing, and if it did, being so DARN OBVIOUS as it is now.
There appears to be a long political parade of government officials who are OVER STEPPING THE ACTUAL SCOPE AND PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DULY ELECTED/APPOINTED POSITIONS.
Rather like an active POLITICAL TRESPASS into SUBJECT AREAS THAT ARE formally and specifically designated to other elected/appointed/employed government officials for them to manage, administer, report, blah, blah, blah, whatever! It is someone else’s assigned duties that are being addressed by politicians elected to do something else…..like running the COLLAPSING STATE OF CALIFUSION!
Take a look at the below article about the Governor Gavin Newsom trips to Denmark and the United Nations in New York regarding global climate change.
SERIOUSLY? Are there not enough very serious problems and failures right here in
“THIS CURRENT STATE OF CALIFUSION”
to occupy the governor’s time and energy? While Califusion sinks further and further into disrepair and mismanagement, Newsom is jetting all over the world to combat climate change on a global level? Good grief. (I seriously doubt Newsom took (rather, “would take”) a cruise ship to Denmark, but who knows? How will he visit his ULTRA LIBERAL LEFTIST COMRADES IN DENMARK IF THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE IS TO BE ABOLISHED IN A COUPLE OF DECADES BY A PARTY OF ANTI AMERICAN SOCIALIST LEFTISTS?)
Well, this isn’t the first visible connection with the LEFT EU that sure might explain the reluctance of Sacramento officials to seriously investigate and prosecute our former LDPCSD GM/Treasurer who had previously stated on the internet (much of his digital background has since been sanitized for some reason) he was a plant manager at DELFT UNIVERSITY in Europe. Strange yeah? Wonder if American Citizenship had anything to do with his initial refusal to take the OATH OF OFFICE at multiple CSD’s he was “remote managing” in the heyday of KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, KAMPACS, KCS, blah, blah, blah…..whatever! Who really knows?
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
2248hrs
1646hrs, still Sunday Sept 22nd
Availability fees – why no increase since first raised from the $10/ac to $60/ac formula many years ago? Because the real estate/land development industry pitches such a fit! Harder to sell properties in the subdivision with higher property tax assessments for water; picking on absentee owners, “whaa, whaa, whaa, this is unfair” ….but it works. Cowardly boards threatened with recall don’t stand up and do what is best for the district and legal customers, and just “go with the flow”.
Ever think about how many of the serious difficulties with the LDPCSD can be directly related to what is considered best for the outside MIDPOU LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES, or even those property owners with unimproved land within the subdivision, over that of the LDP subdivision residents who pay the lion’s share of the bills and actually receive water service?
Why no legally required MSR? Municipal Service Review which is required for changing SOI (Sphere of Influence) which is basically the logical expansion area for a limited service special district. Emery brought that up during the last meeting – funny huh? Golly gee, why no MSR in all these years? I brought it up while on the board a number of times, the very day his (Emery Ross’s) orchestrated plan of hiring this former rogue employee to be our new GM/Treasurer with access to over one million dollars in cash of CSD money, …..our former GM stated quite clearly on the record his advocacy for pursuing the MSR along with a traditional search for a new GM. But the Ross plan worked. Kampa was hired on the spot without even an employment background check – not even here! Evidently being a CSDA (CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION) 20 year BOARD MEMBER trumped even the REASONABLE AND BASIC IDEA OF CHECKING HIS PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RECORD AT THE VERY PUBLIC AGENCY THEY WERE ABOUT TO HAND OVER TO HIM ALONG WITH A MILLION DOLLARS IN CASH!
That’s something else. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT implies a much larger service area than say a residential subdivision which just happened to have been the actual PLACE OF USE entitled to the Merced River water impounded at Lake McClure per Water License 11395. SOI and WATER, a major consideration that even the 1987 detailed Mariposa County SOI Study and Report curiously never mentioned. That report more than adequately documented with exquisite precision all the parcels signing up for E-Z LAFCO ANNEXATION INTO THE LDPCSD which could then provide QUALITY BLENDED GROUNDWATER/RIVER WATER (completely circumventing the restrictions on Merced River water service outside the subdivision POU) for the same price as subdivision entitled properties and without the same use conditions subject to the subdivision properties! Best part for the county and their LAFCO ANNEXATIONS? The added and increasing costs were paid for by MR WECs (Merced River Water Entitled Customers) of the subdivision who were MANDATORY CUSTOMERS OF THE LDPCSD a water company formed by LAFCO to serve LAFCO ANNEXATIONS while forcing all MR WECS to pay for the extra costs!
That sounds incredible, yeah? This in depth massive endeavor to research, study and report on the most reasonable and feasible areas to receive future water service from a TWO COUNTY LAFCO CREATED CSD (which I believe is just a SPECIAL DISTRICT WITH MULTIPLE LIMITED SERVICES).
So, what other services are currently provided by the
LDPCSD? None that I am aware of, but
Mariposa County formed the LDPCSD in August 1980 with the condition that LDPCSD
would eventually take over and run that waste water plant once it was repaired
and operating correctly.
STOP!
Catch that little “qualifier” as to the acceptance of that
waste water facility by the LDPCSD?
Operating correctly?
Sorry, but to me that was/is a BIG CLUE (complete with
yellow flashing caution lights and loud klaxons sounding in the background!)
So, time goes on, the old system is obviously not going to support the UNCONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT AROUND THE GOLF COURSE THAT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SUBDIVISION CC&Rs, but the COUNTY kept issuing and approving permits anyway. Heck, at one time if you were on the Mariposa County website, there were numerous links to the massive TOWNSHIP project proposed by the land development/mortgage Corporation DEERWOOD, out of San Ramon. REM?
Then what does the County do? Have a new waste water plant constructed not on the golf course like the last one, but OUTSIDE THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE OF USE FOR Merced River water! Expensive groundwater must now be used for sewer service around the golf course. So? Well, MR WECs has been subsidizing the water service there as well due to the cost of the GROUNDWATER WELLS Kampa had developed with PUBLIC FUNDS.
Heck, Mariposa County was approving stuff so fast when Deerwood was in motion it was the perfect opportunity for the unscrupulous to pull some fast ones, or so the county might have you believe, personally I think Deerwood had to have knowingly and co-operating officials within key positions in the county to successfully conduct his MANY CUT-CORNERS DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO INCREASE HIS PROFIT MARGIN.
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT SCAM -WRONGFULLY USED TO CONSTRUCT ACTUAL NON-CONFORMING ROADWAYS IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW
Many nonconforming DEVELOPER CONVENIENCE ROADS, carved into hillsides and valleys to enable low cost easy access to traditionally difficult to develop properties because of terrain (steep, rocky, etc.) never obtained the proper CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PERMITS much less APPROVALS. A Deerwood “local representative” would pull an encroachment permit (typically for a 20’ connection from the subdivision lot to county or state maintained roadway) and then with a “driveway permit” actually CONSTRUCT A SUBSTANDARD ROADWAY IN VIOLATION OF EXISTING COUNTY AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS!
So instead of having to construct four separate, and potentially very expensive – depending upon the “view to be obtained”, and legally conforming driveways per REQUIRED SRA FIRE SAFE CODES to each residence, THE DEERWOOD CORPORATION began cutting single lane access roads along the adjacent property boundaries so as to reach each proposed house construction parcel with only one ROADWAY that DEERWOOD and HARRY ALFIER consistently, and incorrectly, refer to as a simple driveway!
Folks, how many times have we seen this through the years? Video on the news involving communities destroyed by wildfire and lives lost because of “hair pin turns”, “bottle-necks”, “one lane roads”, “escape limited areas”, etc, preventing not only fire equipment response, but even more importantly, AN OPEN AND ACCESSIBLE ESCAPE PATH FOR THOSE FLEEING THE CONFLAGRATION! Imagine, thick smoke, bumper to bumper emergency and resident traffic on a 10’ wide winding hillside road, with a steep ravine on the downhill side of the inferior road base, then some vehicle ahead of you breaks down and your are trapped as the fire approaches.
Every time I think about JIM AND MARION DEAN losing close to half a million dollars of their “GOLDEN YEARS RETIREMENT FUND” and leaving this world within weeks of each other with such troubles on their hearts and minds due to a failed attempt to simply get MARIPOSA COUNTY ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA to obey their own existing regulations IN THIS HIGH FIRE SEVERITY DESIGNATED FIRE ZONE…… well, like right now, my blood pressure is up and I am angry that such OUTRAGEOUS NEGLIGENCE AND LACK OF RESPONSIBILITY BY OUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ON BOTH THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL IS PERMITTED TO CONTINUE DAY AFTER DAY, WEEK AFTER WEEK, MONTH AFTER MONTH, YEAR AFTER YEAR…… WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY BY THOSE WHO CONSPIRE TO COMMITT SUCH WRONGDOINGS!
What next? Of course! The State of California would then pass an illegal SRA FIRE FEE on all property owners in SRA and later refuse to refund the money. Well, at least I got ½ back from DMV (another great example of state efficiency and low cost services), but to this day DMV still attempts to wrongfully bill me an extra $22 on each of my registered vehicles every year, after year, after. Can’t use the online registration feature.)
So 1991, California Fire Safe Minimum Roadway standards, SRA (State Responsibility Area) regulations (seven separate PUBLIC SAFETY CODES specifically created to protect life and property), County roadway development/grading regulations, and much more were violated for developer profit on just that one example of a single lane DEVELOPER CONVENIENCE ROAD ON A STEEP HILLSIDE! A 10’ wide road that diagonally divided my friends’ rectangular lot making it useless for the intended purpose of residence construction! So much for property value resale! Just like theft in my mind as the county and state stood by as PUBLIC SAFETY REGULATIONS EXTABLISHED 13 YEARS EARLIER WERE INTENTIONALLY IGNORED! Just so the owner of LAKE DON PEDRO REALTY and the DEERWOOD CORPORATION could have cheap, easy access to their properties with gorgeous views of the high Sierras and Yosemite National Park to sell to someone else. All those carefully designed and existing laws and regulations specifically meant to protect lives and property ignored for increased profit.
My geriatric, innocent, and severely victimized friends, during the very end of their lives, were needlessly tortured through a legal system which placed private convenience profit above justice while simultaneously ignoring the entire public safety aspect of why the CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE EVEN PASSED SRA FIRE SAFE REGULATIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE1!
Can’t do this anymore right now, maybe later. MBTYAY, Lew
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2019
DID THE BOOK BY GOVERNOR NEWSOM INSPIRE CSDA BOARD DIRECTOR PETER KAMPA TO FABRICATE A PLACE OF USE MAP FOR MERCED RIVER WATER?
Let’s try to “unpack” that interesting question:
Was CSDA (CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION) 20 year board director, Peter Kampa, inspired by Governor Newsom’s 2013 book – [“CITIZENVILLE: How to Take the Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government”], in regards to Kampa’s management activities with the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District between the years 2014-2019?
Did Kampa correctly, or wrongfully, utilize information from
that book in his CLEAR ATTEMPT to permanently continue the unethical
exploitation of thousands of customers in a California Special District?
NOTE: I HAVE NOT READ THE GOVERNOR’S BOOK! Actually just learned of it this morning and ordered a paperback version on Amazon, I have, however, read some comments by others who have read the book. (below)
Using social media to change society and break
government grid-lock
Using social media and technology to modernize local
government
Future of digital democracy
Citizen engagement and the next political order
Encourages citizen involvement rather than waiting
for government to solve problems.
Problems to be solved by popular opinion
Ordinary peoples’ voices are being drowned out by
special interests
Newsom argues that we can end a lot of the Washington political gridlock if Government were to open up its data troves and allow other (more motivated) parties invent their own solutions.”
“He (Newsom) shows how the government has so much data that they don’t know what they really have or what to do with it. So others have discovered what to do with it and benefited many people. And it didn’t cost the government one cent.”
I found the above/below two comments particularly interesting and perhaps applicable to our Lake Don Pedro CSD in the following respects:
Open government data to more motivated parties to invent their own solutions – Kampa was obviously motivated to complete the LAFCO ANNEXED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS he {wrongfully} orchestrated into the LDPCSD between the years 1994-1997. He is certainly inventive when it comes to truthful fact. He returned to the LDPCSD in 2014 to create an ALTERNATE SOURCE OF WATER through development of extremely expensive GROUNDWATER WELLS with government grants. {Which includes misrepresentation of facts in application, and misappropriation of funds for actual purpose of expanding water services and license compliance for violations}. Yup, that groundwater was (and still is) being used for a water license compliance purpose and remedy for intentional violations by replacing all Merced River water illegally leaving the subdivision approved Place of Use. This new publicly funded groundwater production was also secretly intended to facilitate further development outside the license POU for many other LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES, including a 900 acre proposed subdivision which was apparently concealed from the public for over 20 years (if it was legally annexed in 1995 which I seriously doubt based on the available evidence since the County of Mariposa has REFUSED FURTHER PUBLIC ACCESS TO THEIR LAFCO ANNEXATION RECORDS) , HOW THAT NEW GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION IS BEING USED IS A FAR CRY FROM ITS INTENDED PURPOSE OF ASSISTING EXISTING CUSTOMERS DURING EXTENDED EMERGENCY DROUGHT!
Government is unaware of exactly what data they have – Since government is unaware of what it actually possessed, all Pete Kampa had to do was quietly “slip in” or “Plant”, the DISINFORMATION HE REQUIRED FOR HIS WATER EXPANSION PLANS somewhere in the state system. Once residing there, he could then later reference that particular information as being a legitimate record of that government entity and continue utilizing it in support of his decades old “foothill water scam”. (Can you imagine how many private individuals/companies and government officials have signed off on this PUBLIC DECEPTION AND ABUSE OF GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY in the attempt to increase revenue streams for their respective, and benefiting, counties?) Apparently, the DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES was the data repository chosen for Kampa’s FAKE POU MAP IMPLANTATION. (Imagine what else has been “planted” by this well known CSDA “mover and shaker” in the last 20 years?) Obviously there are many other government and private entities working within the state water industry which will continue to use and pass on this “BAD INFORMATION”. We know from the initial SWRCB investigation …..(which was EXCELLENT WHEN INITIATED but when the primary investigator was curiously transferred to another division, apparent operatives for Kampa took over and have attempted multiple times to close the investigation based only on THE FURTHER FALSE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY KAMPA. Despite requests to both the state and LDPCSD – critical information as to this continuing “digital map deception” has been denied for public review. Ie, using media format that cannot be viewed in answer to REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION – rather like a secret code between Kampa and the investigator!) ….. that the NOTICE OF VIOLATION was based on a DIGITAL SHAPE FILE MAP from back in 1993 which “somehow” ended up in DWR as the OFFICIAL POU FOR WL11395, which as we all should know by now, certainly is not. But how did it get there? Who has used that information since and for what purposes?
We’ve heard KAMPA’s own words many times – “from the files of others”, “not my work, others work”, “official files of others”, etc.. all in that failing effort to appear and sound as though Pete Kampa had nothing to do with the implantation disinformation for his own purposes.
Perhaps after reading the book I’ll have some other thoughts, although as written above, I seriously doubt there will be any examples or instruction by the California Governor on how to commit a criminal conspiracy and falsify government records to achieve victories over the traditional stalling gridlock of government. Decisions like that are left to highly motivated and unethical followers in other positions of public trust.
Thank you for your submission to the Call Kurtis Program regarding
your complaint with Lake Don Pedro Community Services District. Due to the complexities of your case, I
recommend you bring your case before the Stanislaus Grand Jury for review and,
hopefully, a resolution satisfactory to all parties. We are not attorney’s and can not provide
legal assistance. In your case, there are many moving parts, many of
which may include laws and by laws of which we can not dispute nor debate.
Should you choose to contact the Stanislaus Grand Jury for review
of your complaint, you can file your complaint on-line. Steps are below.
You will find a plethora of forms to choose from, Selecting
the correct form for your cause may be daunting, therefore, I have listed the
contact information for the County Grand Jury should you choose to speak with a
representative.
Steps for on-line forms:
.Go to: The Superior Court of Stanislaus County
.Click on “Forms and Filing” at the top of the page.
.Select the appropriate form for your cause, complete and submit.
The Superior Court of Stanislaus County
800 11th Street, Modesto, Ca. 95354
209-530-3100
I wish you much success in your endeavor, Mr. Richardson.
Sincerely,
Joni Thursday
KOVR team
?????????????????????
My Friday, September 20, 2019 response to this polite refusal and
offer of worthless information (just like the LDPCSD and Public Information
Requests, yeah? Lol):
Dear Kurtis, or rather, Joni; first of all, yes unreported
apparent organized criminal conspiracies by government officials to defraud a
large group of innocent citizen consumers in a CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT can
get rather complex. It is almost as
though the perpetrators don’t want to get caught, exposed, or punished for
their intentional wrongdoings. Imagine
that. “My complaint”? Technically yes, but a serious problem for
every California citizen. I never asked for any legal representation or for you
to debate laws and bylaws…… only to publicly report verified undisputed
fact. Sorry but you folks just joined
the many others who talk about consumer protections and positive activism for
change yet simply refuse to become involved even when correction might only
require minimal research and honest reporting for the public’s benefit – AS
THEY ARE THE ONES TO MAKE NECESSARY CHANGE DUE TO GOVERNMENT FAILURE TO CORRECT
ITSELF. Most of the information is
already available and easy to confirm yet your failure (refusal) to report the
truth only assists in permitting such outrageous activities in our once great
state to continue unchecked. Seriously,
a decades old foothill water scam in a drought prone California Special
District that was orchestrated by one of the most influential CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION BOARD DIRECTORS in the last 20 years? And you claim to be investigators working for
consumers and righting wrongs? Oh
please. Pursuing “low hanging fruit” for
ratings is disingenuous. For your
information, since even your limited background inquiry for the last few weeks
is also incorrect, the Stanislaus County Grand Jury has nothing to do with this
matter and is just one more variable as to how this continuing corruption and
fraud is confused and facilitated — through a zip code representing areas in
the three different counties of Stanislaus, Tuolumne and Mariposa! Did you know tens of thousands of dollars are
likely AND WRONGFULLY collected by the DMV every year in this area due to
INCORRECTLY CHARGING MARIPOSA RESIDENTS FOR STANISLAUS REQUIRED SMOG CHECKS FOR
REGISTRATION! All this started in 2013
with a new DMV DEPARTMENT HEAD (recently replaced) yet corrections (despite
complaints at every registration period) cannot be made. Humm, maybe it is just “pay back harassment”
by some DEEP STATE ACTIVIST for those who speak up against wrongful government
activities? I cannot register my
vehicles online and must use USPS mail to a specific address just to obtain
registration tags. When I finally
received only ½ of my excess payments to the DMV I later received a CUSTOMER
SURVEY that was already filled out with the highest positive remarks
available! Lol I often get jury summons from Stanislaus
despite years of correcting telephone calls that never fix the problem. Then there’s the added insurance
difficulties. Heck, even the STATE
WATER BOARD HAS INCORRECTLY LISTED STANISLAUS AND SUTTER COUNTIES AS THE
VIOLATION LOCATIONS ON THEIR WATER RIGHT VIOLATIONS WEBPAGE INSTEAD OF TUOLUMNE
AND MARIPOASA where that incorrect information has remained for over year
despite complaints as to the inaccuracy!)
Our state information system is a mess! And this refusal of yours missed
a perfect opportunity of illustrating one of the ways this BAD INFORMATION GETS
INTO THE DATA STREAM….INTENTIONALLY TO CONCEAL CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR! Thanks for the suggestion but I have already
appeared before the Mariposa Grand Jury in the past which is incapable of
correcting this continuing criminal conspiracy to defraud thousands of Merced
River Water Entitled Customers of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision. Wonder if that inability (refusal) to correct
the matter could be related to these two counties apparently setting up, and
permitting, the eventual hi-jacking of our surface water treatment plant in
order to provide a SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION SERVICE to their
many highly suspicious LAFCO ANNEXATIONS INTO THE WATER DISTRICT outside the
PLACE OF USE OF THE WATER LICENSE? (Wow,
I wonder, could that be why the County of Mariposa has closed access to LAFCO ANNEXATION FILES and refuses PUBLIC
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION?)
Golly gee, could the
two counties simply be refusing to investigate what they intentionally set up in
August 1980 through a MASSIVE PUBLIC DECEPTION AS TO THE CLEAR WATER LICENSE
RESTRICTIONS REGARDING SERVICE OUTSIDE THE SUBDIVISON? Did these counties form the LAKE DON PEDRO
CSD as an instrument to be used to redirect LICENSED WATER to various developments
outside the POU without the financial obligation to the respective
counties? Not that you’re interested,
but, how could a LAFCO commissioned 1987 in-depth Sphere of Influence study
(for future district service expansion outside the license POU) omit
acknowledgement of the CLEAR MERCED RIVER WATER RESTRICTIONS IN WL11395? Yes SIR! A detailed LAFCO COMMISSIONED
report CLEARLY ENCOURAGING WATER SERVICE FOR THOUSANDS OF ACRES OUTSIDE THE
LICENSE POU yet it failed to even mention the fact the district could not
legally provide that water under the license which resulted in forcing
thousands of innocent property owners in the subdivision (MANDATORY LDPCSD
CUSTOMERS DUE TO PROPERTY REGULATIONS) to quietly SUBSIDIZE A GROUNDWATER
SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM DEDICATED TO SERVING WATER TO MANY SUSPICIOUS LAFCO
ANNEXATIONS? Does that not sound a bit
SELF SERVING TO YOU? Counties creating
a SPECIAL DISTRICT to secretly serve their own development interests while
passing the expenses on to entitled water users of the subdivision? I did not believe you and your organization
would do anything either (you have no idea how many such polite refusals to
REPORT THE TRUTH AND ASSIST EXPLOITED LEGAL CITIZENS I have received through
the years….but then again, maybe you do?
Perhaps your California media controlled industry has some sort of
NONINTERVENTION PACT regarding matters which might be uncomplimentary to
current DEMOCRATIC-PROGRESSIVE-SOCIALIST-LEFT government?) Who knows, but
thought I’d try anyway based on what appeared to be a sincere effort of
assistance to California consumers ON YOUR PART, but you didn’t even present
this “refusal to report” yourself.
That’s essentially the entire problem: media refusing to investigate and
report as to the truths and facts in California which are pulling us down every
single day. Citizens don’t know what’s
going on because organizations like yours refuse to inform them. Your carefully manufactured façade of
diligent investigation and correction of wrongs is only a distraction from a
far more serious reality. Are you
fearful that a LEGITIMATE HONEST INVESTIGATION AND NEWS REPORT WOULD CAST AN
UNFAVORABLE LIGHT ON THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION? This
is another perfect example of why Our beloved California has sunk into chaos and
disrepair so rapidly – everyone can see the unethical and illegal things going
on yet every single government promoted public option for corrective change
….from the local sheriff/DA/Grand Jury all the way to the Governor and
Department of Justice and Attorney General (who evidently has his own character
and integrity issues in Washington DC with that substituted DNC server) is an
ineffectual, frustrating waste of time….just as intended! Such anti-American criminal enterprises orchestrated
within and around government entities are not only tolerated, but actually
encouraged and flourish due to a lack of legitimate enforcement and
accountability of those responsible for citizen betrayal and treachery. {How
can the public cry for change occur if the public is uninformed?} FIY, I
was not seeking any legal remedy from your organization – just a legitimate
investigation and some publicity of the cold hard facts which you apparently
already understand. You just don’t want
to become involved. You are part of the
problem – not the solution for California.
You and your organization should be ashamed for your refusal to report
on something so patently wrong and damaging to our state and citizen
consumers. Thanks for the late notice
and refusal to become advocates for justice.
Your acquiescence to such active discrimination and harm to thousands of
innocent water entitled consumers in a drought prone area (during a state wide
emergency multi-year drought no less); who have been victimized by their own
SPECIAL DISTRICT – hi-jacked by special interest board directors who appointed
a former rogue employee and current CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION
BOARD DIRECTOR as our GM/Treasurer in 2014, is almost amusing if not so
outrageously dangerous, counterproductive, and simply UNAMERICAN. No worries though, be assured I won’t bother
you again about this failed opportunity to demonstrate your commitment to
“DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR CALIFORNIA CONSUMERS”.
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20th, 2019
CONTINUED LDPCSD REFUSAL TO PROVIDE PUBLIC INFORMATION ALL MR WECs SHOULD HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO VIEW AND UNDERSTAND!
SURE WOULD HELP IN UNDERSTANDING WHY THE LDPCSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS AGAIN ATTEMPTING TO RAISE OUR RATES AND FEES WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY CONCEALING RELEVANT AND EXPLANATORY INFORMATION AS TO WHAT THIS BOARD AND OUR PREVIOUS GM/TREASURER, and his staff, HAD BEEN DOING SINCE OCTOBER 2014!
After again reading the same non-responsive information “they” provided last time, I sent the below email to the LDPCSD office this morning……
Syndie, thank you for the most recent and
highly suspicious attempt to provide information I have been requesting
since April 2019. Unfortunately, this most recent Lake Don Pedro CSD
response – September 19th, 2019 – some five months past the original
request (along with other failures to adequately and properly respond) cost me
another $12 for worthless repeated information I already possess.
In fact, you only provided the same identical material again. In
other words, yesterday’s response was also INCOMPLETE/NONRESPONSIVE FOR THE
SPECIFIC INFORMATION I HAVE BEEN REQUESTING, thus, ANOTHER REFUSAL.
Not surprising, but extremely frustrating, is the fact what I am requesting is
indeed the most important and relevant information forwarded to the SWRCB from
the LDPCSD: the SHAPEFILE MAP INFORMATION which our former
GM/Treasurer Pete Kampa provided the California SWRCB, Division of Water Rights
in answer to their February 2017 Notice of Water Right Violations.
PLEASE REFER to the “HIGH IMORTANCE”
CLASSIFICATION OF THE EMAIL PETE KAMPA SENT TO SWRCB OFFICIAL VICTOR VASQUEZ ON
February 22, 2018 – THIS IS THE EMAIL CONTAINING THE INFORMATION I AM
REQUESTING which either you and/or Kampa have repeatedly and EFFECTIVELY
removed from the correspondence material furnished to the state. KAMPA
STATES IN HIS (again I paid for this incorrect assertion) MAY 2, 2019 EMAIL
that his response attachments TO MY REQUEST FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION “ARE
THE TOTALITY OF THE RECORDS” which is obviously AN INCORRECT STATEMENT when you
read his February 22, 2018 email, which in the first sentence states:
“ATTACHED PLEASE FIND SHAPE FILES
CONTAINING MAPS WHICH PROVIDES OVERLAYS OF ALL THE FOLLOWING: the license
POU, the LDPCSD boundaries, and all parcels served with water by the LDPCSD.”
Syndie, please read the above sentence
again, THIS IS THE INFORMATION I HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO OBTAIN SINCE APRIL…..THE
ATTACHED MAPS KAMPA SENT TO THE SWRCB – which evidently completely
MISREPRESENTED OUR DISTRICTS MOST IMPORTANT BOUNDARIES, everything else
you and/or Kampa have provided I already possess (and have paid for) which
is absolutely worthless in regards to what is actually being sought and
apparently refused.
SO again, I would appreciate paper copies
of those attached maps (paper copies which are clearly available as
documented in Kampa’s own offer to provide them if Mr. Vasquez so desired, ie,
first sentence third paragraph, or the 15th sentence down from the
“Mr. Vasquez” in the email).
CONTINUING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO PROVIDE
PUBLIC INFORMATION. Pete
Kampa’s use of a media format to respond to an OFFICIAL VIOLATION NOTICE BY THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA that cannot be shared with the public (in multiple
agenda packets) or provided when legally requested multiple times in Public
Information Requests, certainly appears to be an INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO
PROVIDE THIS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT PUBLIC INFORMATION.
OFFICIAL DISTRICT CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE
STATE. The fact such material is
official LDPCSD correspondence I would think it would reside in our official
LDPCSD records yet the vast amount of delay time it takes a LONG EMPLOYEED
DISTRICT OFFICE MANAGER / BOARD SECRETARY TO RESPOND, suggests this information
may be in the SOLE POSSESSION OF OUR FORMER GM/TREASURER which certainly
encourages the possibility that this official district information has been
stolen from the district office, or in the alternative, never properly filed
for accurate record retention.
“SECRET PRIVACY CODE” BETWEEN
INVESTIGATOR AND RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR THE VIOLATION. When you stop and think about this situation, PETE KAMPA has
essentially answered an OFFICIAL NOTICE OF WATER LICENSE VIOLATION BY THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA with much associated material which only attempts to conceal the
fact that the primary and most important pieces of information (the attached
shape file maps) have been provided in A CODE WHICH ONLY THE INVESTIGATOR AND
THE ALLLEGED PERPETRATOR CAN UNDERSTAND. (An investigator/perpetrator
relationship which I believe encourages such concealment of relevant fact.
WAITED LONG ENOUGH FOR THIS PUBLIC
INFORMATION AND SHOULD BE CREDITED FOR PAST NONRESPONSIVE PAYMENTS. Please have paper copies of these
maps created and furnished to me within the traditional 10 day period, and
please apply the last $12 payment towards this bill, since the LDPCSD RESPONSE
YESTERDAY was again clearly nonresponsive and only intended to further delay
efforts in obtaining PUBLIC INFORMATION THAT ALL MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED
CUSTOMERS OF THE LDP SUBDIVISION SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND
UNDERSTAND AS IT IS CRITICAL AS TO UNDERSTANDING (among other issues) WHY THE
LDPCSD IS CURRENTLY ATTEMPTING TO RAISE RATES AND FEES with another PROPOSITION
218 WHILE ACTIVELY IGNORING the primary reason why customers are charged more
while consistently receiving less, with emphasis on honest and efficient
district management and administration.
Sincerely, Lew Richardson
PS: I am specifically requesting
paper copies of these SHAPE FILE MAPS but as you are well aware with your
advanced CSDA office managing and secretary training courses, an alternative
and accepted production of the information might also consist of providing the
appropriate viewing equipment in the LDPCSD office and a reasonable time for me
to study and review the information might also be acceptable, as I could then
make my own copies of the information if desired. Unfortunately, l was
never offered or provided this option either. Such secret communications
between an investigator and suspected perpetrator of the violation smacks of a
conspiracy to actively deny customers relevant public information which should
have been provided in a Brown Act conforming district agenda packet, or at the
very least posted on the LDPCSD webpage as the digital information that it
is.
Wednesday, September 18th, 2019
The LPDCSD Administration Office has been closed on Wednesdays for many years in the effort to provide “staff” with more “uninterrupted time” since (apparently) customers calling the office to pay bills, request service assistance, district information, etc. disrupts the office schedule to the point that Wednesdays are simply closed to the public – all other days the office is closed after 1430 hours [2:30PM] for the same intended purpose of “catching up on district work” which reportedly accumulates during the other days of the week (due to public interruptions) thus slowing down optimum efficiency or something along those lines.
Therefore, the below traditional requested opportunity to purchase and pickup a $3.00 audio CD of the LDPCSD Monday September 16th, 2019 Board of Directors meeting won’t be available until sometime after this “office closed to public Wednesday”.
Someone joked to me that the cost should only be $1.50 considering there was only one action item on that bare bones agenda. lol
Don’t think that would fly, because after all, with all the CSDA related information Pete Kampa use to cram into those agendas to make them “appear extremely busy with important work”, charges for that “facade of actual work” would have cost much more than $3.00!
Why must an LDPCSD customer pay more for public information that should already be on our GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY AWARDED CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT WEBSITE? All of that and much, much more should already be posted on our CSDA affiliated website. Certificate of Excellence? lol Why do some special districts receive timely, accurate and FREE PUBLIC INFORMATION but in Lake Don Pedro customers must pay extra? (Yes, I see it…..legal MR WECS already pay much more for their water service than they should, why not just extend that philosophy and make LDPCSD customers pay more for ANYTHING district related?)
Gosh, wouldn’t you think an influential 20 year CSDA (California Special District Association) experienced/trained Board Member like Pete Kampa could have pulled some CSDA strings and insured our LDPCSD would have an up to date, properly functioning, and factually informative website for our customers? Golly Gee professor…. if a CSDA SUPER-STAR BOARD DIRECTOR LIKE PETE KAMPA CAN’T GET THE JOB DONE – PERHAPS THOSE WEBSITE OPTIONS OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS POSSESS AND ENJOY JUST CAN’T BE DONE IN LAKE DON PEDRO FOR SOME REASON?
REM? THE OLD MICKY MOUSE SONG? SING ALONG WITH ME FOR THE ANSWER TO THE ABOVE QUESTION:
COR – RUP – Teee IO N!
[MIC KEY MO US E]
I digress…..anyway, below is the most recent and, as of yet, unanswered request for the VERY BUSY “ONE ACTION ITEM AGENDA” FROM LAST MONDAY (of course there were other important matters to address as well ….approval of past Minutes (Consent Calendar) and having yet another CLOSED SESSION MEETING (where confidential information is not available to the public) for directors to discuss POTENTIAL DISTRICT LITIGATION with our attorney. But don’t fret MR WECS….surely we will be advised if such “POTENTIAL LITIGATION” materializes into a fine, penalty, or some other monetary demand required as a result of improper activities by district officials or their contracted employees.
Another worn out old song:
THEY PLAY, WE PAY!
TO: Syndie Marchesiello, LDPCSD Office Manager and Board Secretary
Tuesday, September 17, 2019 @ 0740hrs
“Please advise when the CD is ready and I will make arrangements for pickup and payment. Incidentally, the Groveland CSD has a great example of how such public information can be posted on their website (as Peter Kampa previously agreed would be a good addition as to “transparency” for the LDPCSD rather than having customers once again pay for something that should be provided for free). Lew Richardson
PS I still have not heard from the GM regarding my information request from last July regarding the additional materials Pete Kampa sent to the SWRCB in response to the second corrected response in regards to the NOTICE OF VIOLATION.“
???????????????
I wonder, considering how the LDPCSD does everything else …..
(such as…. concealing from the GENERAL PUBLIC, LEGAL CUSTOMERS and even SITTING DIRECTORS – an alleged 1995 Mariposa County LAFCO APPROVED ANNEXATION for a proposed 900 acre OUTSIDE MIDPOU residential subdivision across the street from the LDPCSD administration building which had been submitted and rejected multiple times through the decades – a subdivision IF LEGALLY APPROVED must be furnished our LIMITED AND VERY EXPENSIVE EMERGENCY DROUGHT GROUNDWATER developed with state and federal grant money intended for existing customers during a STATE WIDE EMERGENCY DROUGHT!)
(still wondering) ….. is there any potential danger our Board of Defectors, their new general manager (and in-training Board Treasurer) boasting a “classified past employment background” per Board President Danny Johnson, and their long time Office Manager/Board Secretary might realize the office, in fact their entire misdirected district operation, would “OPERATE MUCH MORE LIKE THEY DESIRE” if ALL CUSTOMER INTERRUPTIONS were eliminated completely?
Much easier for us MANDATORY CUSTOMERS TOO! Just continue writing larger checks, charging greater amounts on plastic credit cards, but most importantly, simply approve any district proposed PROPOSITION 218 rate and fee increase without bothersome questions as to why it is necessary. After all, the board has just spent another $30,000 in public funds in hopes of encouraging us to willfully pay more without research as to why. Gosh, should we just co-operate and financially surrender? Perhaps “blank checks” written to the LDPCSD that they could fill in later as required?
After all, won’t everything run much better for those currently in control of our district when our money is the only thing with which they must deal? (Or was that “steal”? I forget sometimes.) lol
Cheer up MR WECS, I believe one heck of a POSITIVE POLITICAL STORM is brewing for the 2020 elections……tax and fee paying Californians are sick of such public corruption and absolute waste of public funds and resources!
SELF SERVING SOCIALIST-LEFT DEMOCRATS OUT!
ANYONE
WITH “COMMON SENSE” IN!
My best to you and yours, Lew
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Monday, Sept 16, 2019
You know, there is a possible explanation as to why the State of
California and its law enforcement departments and agencies do not aggressively
prosecute those who so clearly and intentionally violate water license restrictions and/or continue fabricating
government documents regarding service areas in order to wrongfully provide
water to those not entitled under the law.
Think about the possibility that people like Pete Kampa are doing
exactly what the SOCIALIST LEFT DEMOCRATS DESIRE – he is effectively redistributing
wealth for those NOT ENTITLED. (Water is
certainly wealth, especially in a drought prone area with relatively cheap foothill
land. Simple formula for success and
wealth: LOW COST DRY DROUGHT LAND + A QUALITY WATER SUPPLY = MASSIVE REAL ESTATE
PROFITS!
All accomplished with water that was legally allocated to property
owners who have paid dearly for that water service in numerous ways for decades
– besides just the initial price tag on the actual RESIDENTIAL LOT IN THE
APPROVED SUBDIVISION. Primarily these
subdivision owners pay for that right to water thanks to the COVENANTS, CODES
and RESTRICTIONS (CC&Rs) on their property which run with title for
perpetuity – or until the property owners association is dissolved, which is
highly unlikely considering the revenue it generates for a vast number of
individuals and companies involved with CID (Common Interest Development)
industry – not to mention the lawyers and courts!
CC&Rs make predicting a future water demand for a large area much
easier, primarily by curtailing further subdivision of those lands. (Imagine a one acre residential lot being
divided into quarters, therefore, three more homes (and associated water use
for landscaping and such) = 4 times the water
consumed other than the original one residence.
Now multiply that by the thousands of subdivision properties.) These LAFCO ANNEXATIONS outside the PLACE OF
USE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER have no such CC&Rs on their land and they can
therefore consume water at a much greater rate than LEGALLY CONTROLLED
DEVELOPMENT IN A CID SUBDIVISION. They
can use water in ways prohibited in the subdivision – especially during
emergency drought conditions when subdivision owners could be hit with a heavy fine
for violating restrictions.
The fact an outside PLACE OF USE commercial cattle rancher (originally denied water service decades ago by the district), who has been utilizing treated chlorinated water for a “for profit cattle business” (with water clearly intended for human consumption in the approved subdivision) can also serve on the LDPCSD board of directors for so many years (thanks to LAFCO GERRYMANDERING where non stakeholders of LAFCO ANNEXED LAND can participate in director elections even when not receiving water or paying a thin dime to the district), also speaks quite clearly as to this unethical water scam MR WECS (Merced River Water Entitled Customers) of the subdivision, have been forced to financially support for decades. Subdivision property owners are MANDATORY LDPCSD CUSTOMERS due to CC&Rs! SO, MR WECS became the designated DEEP POCKET for SUBSIDIZED LAFCO ANNEXATION WATER SERVICE thanks to the criminal antics of DEEP STATE ACTIVISTS?
So, consider. Perhaps the State of California actually “boxed itself in” concerning further desired development” with all the laws, regulations, EPA conditions, etc. it creates, passes, and imposes on citizens? The “state” (rather individuals within state government representing/using state authority) to its dismay finds itself in the same position as the citizens it OVER REGULATES AND CONTROLS – SIMPLY STUCK and CONSTRAINED by its own existing laws, regulations, EPA conditions, etc.. that it legislated and passed.
Ahhhh, but there is a BIG DIFFERENCE – UNLIKE THE AVERAGE CITIZEN who must abide by these government regulations or face very severe penalties, state employees/officials have another “secret viable option” : THEY JUST PLAIN CHEAT! “THE DEEP STATE” accepted program for “needed change”. (These individuals place their own personal, political, business beliefs over that of the citizens they ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SERVING ACCORDING TO EXISTING LAW.)
These people violate their own rules while patting each other on the back and whispering they do it “FOR THE GOOD OF THE PUBLIC” (or whatever excuse is convenient, acceptable and helps take the sting out of being recognized as just a common law violating criminal). You see, their “good intentions” transform clear criminal activities into palatable and acceptable “activism for good”.
They intentionally “short-circuit” the legal process by refusing to perform their assigned duties, and become a CORRUPTED PROCESS FOR THEIR DESIRED CHANGE from within an otherwise legitimate government entity. But they cannot do this alone. Enter characters like PETER KAMPA and his long time professional lobbyist organization the CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION (CSDA) to quietly move into stubborn “development stalled area” and (in Lake Don Pedro’s case) reconfigure an existing SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT (specifically constructed for the subdivision) into an EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FACILITY CATERING TO LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES (suspiciously brought into district boundaries) WHICH SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN PERMITTED ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN ESTABLISHED LAFCO REGULATIONS! (LAFCO violating its own rules in order to serve water to properties it annexed? Hum, sounds rather self-serving, yeah?)
So, could this “CALIFORNIA ACCEPTED DEEP STATE ACTIVITY” explain why the folks
DOWN IN SACRAMENTO
(lol)
don’t give a squat about an ACTIVE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE STATE WATER LAW THAT HAS CONTINUED AND FESTERED FOR DECADES BRINGING NOTHING BUT MISERY TO COUNTLESS PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE EQUATION?
Who knows?
My best to you and yours, Lew
Why not for the 2020 election…..
REPLACE CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATS WITH ….
“ANYBODY ELSE WITH COMMON SENSE”!
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Sunday, September 15th, 2019.
QUESTIONS AS TO “WHAT TYPE” OF TRANSPARENCY?
So very sad how public funded deceptions of fact can be
“planted” within legitimate government data repositories for later
use in the continued distortion of history to the benefit of “special interest”
others. As taxpaying citizens we deserve much better than this. What a nightmare of tangled falsehoods with fabricated
written documents, drawings, maps, dishonored Oaths of Office, etc., all used
to convey false information and encourage detrimental reliance upon what
appears at first blush to be reasonable and authentic, yet turnout to be just
another in a long line of fake LDPCSD documents. Forgeries that blur reality to only permit more
wrongdoing while pursing the special interests of land development and real
estate. Just throw MR WECS (Merced River
Water Entitled Customers) under the bus because dry, drought prone foothill
land + a dependable supply of quality water = BIG
PROFIT! Consider, a criminal conspiracy spanning
decades to violate known water right restrictions while simultaneously subjecting
thousands of innocent property owners in the LDP subdivision (and MANDATORY
CUSTOMERS of the Lake Don Pedro CSD) to subsidize an extremely expensive groundwater
substitution program for owners of LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES INTO THE DISTRICT which
our CSD had no legal duty or moral obligation to provide service. Apparently
LAFCOs formed the district to be the “deep pocket” and “water source” for rural
county land development without their responsibility for providing the “alternate
source water” for these developments on OUTSIDE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT PLACE
OF USE LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES. LAFCO FORMED THE CSD, BUT THEN STARTED DUMPING
ANNEXATION AFTER ANNEXATION ON A DISTRICT THAT COULD NOT LEGALLY SUPPLY THE
WATER OUTSIDE THE SUBDIVISION THUS FORCING ALL CUSTOMERS (99% legal MR WECS) TO
EVENTUALLY PAY FOR EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER WELLS
FOR THE “LEGAL REMEDY” OF
REPLACING ALL THE MERCED RIVER WATER ILLEGALLY LEAVING THE ENTITLED RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION! WE PAY FOR THE CONTINUED
THEFT!
Sorry, but I believe all those who
were knowingly involved with such special district exploitation, mismanagement,
continued fraud, and a host of other unethical practices …
[especially the falsification of records and apparently permitting such
to be used to obtain state and federal grant money INTENDED for EMERGENCY
DROUGHT RELIEF BUT ACTUALLY MISAPPROPRIATED TO DEVELOP a massive “alternate
water source” FOR MANDATORY WATER LICENSE
COMPLIANCE REPORTING DUE TO THE MANY PAST INTENTIONAL USE VIOLATIONS OUTSIDE THE
CLEAR POU RESTRICTIONS OF THE WATER LICENSE!
– JUST THINK…..NOW Mariposa County is pressuring the LDPCSD to take control
and operation of their NIGHTMARE OF AN OUTSIDE MIDPOU CONSTRUCTED WASTE WATER
PLANT WHICH MUST ALSO FUNCTION ON A GROUNDWATER SUPPLY PRIMARILY PAID FOR BY MR
WECS WHO UTILIZE THEIR OWN ON-SITE SEPTIC DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND ARE NOT TIED
INTO THE ONE AROUND THE GOLF COURSE.
— should all be prosecuted, but most importantly, prohibited from any future involvement with public employment or community services. YUP! This would be especially appropriate for the primary perpetrator who is a 20 year experienced board member with the California Special District Association who should be held to a higher standard of conduct and certainly prosecuted with the same vigor in which he successfully polluted the government information stream for local, State and Federal entities with known false information. The “rippling sociological effects” of such criminal conduct is difficult to imagine. Can you imagine the number of people that purchased land with the misrepresented understanding water would be available from the LDPCSD? Such property sales are simply wrong but the new owner’s argument is with the person who sold the property and their own failure to exercise due diligence in researching the facts prior to purchase. Yup, unfair all the way around when the rules are intentionally violated for the private profit and/or convenience of those with “influence” in local matters.
Such is life in the “new normal” “Deep State” California?
My best to you and yours, Lew
DEMOCRATS OUT IN 2020!
MOVE COMMON SENSE BACK IN!
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 13th, 2019. Hope I have done this correctly…..just click the below “link title” for the entire blah, blah, blah…..you know, I believe I lost a more recent version…..lucky for you folks! lol
Yesterday reminded me to follow up on a request for public information that has been ignored by the LDPCSD for some reason.
Tuesday, September 10th, 2019 – Below request sent this morning.
TO: Board Secretary/Office Manager Syndie Marchesiello and GM Patrick McGowen:
RE: Continuing request for information former GM KAMPA provided the SWRCB in response to WATER RIGHT NOTICE OF VIOLATION
“I was advised my (multiple) requests have now been referred to GM McGowan since Pete Kampa resigned his position, however, the ten day response period since the last request (August 19th) has again passed. I am confused why this is such a difficult public information request to provide. Surely the LDPCSD is aware of the information Mr. Kampa provided the SWRCB in response to the NOTICE OF VIOLATION issued September 28, 2016. I would appreciate “hard copies” of this information since the digital files Pete Kampa forwarded to me in the initial response months ago were worthless as they could not be opened and viewed (“trial version” of the software did not work and I should not be forced to purchase new software – as already reported in the previous “follow up request”). I would appreciate a response concerning this matter as I believe I have been quite patient with these continued delays in providing this important public information. Information which certainly appears to have had a serious (and continuing) detrimental effect upon our district and the thousands of legal Merced River Water using customers of the subdivision who have been forced (as MANDATORY CUSTOMERS OF THE LDPCSD DUE TO PROPERTY CCRs) to SUBSIDIZE A GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM for LAFCO ANNEXATIONS outside the PLACE OF USE of water license 11395. (Annexations which PETE KAMPA clearly set up over 20 years ago when beginning his infamous water career here in Lake Don Pedro between the years 1994-1997.) Surely the district can appreciate such activity (forced subsidies for LAFCO ANNEXATIONS) has completely negated the purpose and characteristics of a CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT. (The fact former GM PETE KAMPA has been a board director with the CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION (CSDA) for the last 20 years is yet another curious aspect to the activities taking place between 2014-2019 while “voice of the district” as Board President Danny Johnson proclaimed him years ago. That “voice” may now have been replaced, however, the past activities of Pete Kampa still resonate throughout district operations, negatively affect the water entitled district customers, and are still subject to public review. Legal rate paying customers deserve to know exactly what information was forwarded to the State of California Water Rights Division by our then district GM since it is quite clear state investigators STILL DO NOT FULLY COMPREHEND THE FACTS of the matter and have attempted three times now to close that investigation with patently false information. Did that incorrect information originate from the LDPCSD through Pete Kampa? Did officials at the SWRCB Water Rights Division insert the information? Perhaps a combination of the two? The public’s right to know is especially important now since the district is clearly proceeding towards implementation of another Proposition 218 to raise rates and fees due to a claimed lack of adequate operating funds. Is the district’s current refusal to provide this public information related to the current plan of raising rates and fees again on the thousands of innocent, yet continually victimized, legal Merced River Water consuming customers of the subdivision? Seems to me such action would only compound the seriousness of the situation and draw more attention and perhaps even force new avenues for the acquisition of public information that could, and should, be easily provided. Sincerely, Lew Richardson”
Monday, September 9th, 2019.
HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY A.J.! Looking forward to meeting you!
Yes indeed, I’m still here! lol
On to this post. Recently found some old meeting recordings of mine. Strange how this November 10th, 2014 LDPCSD Board meeting (clip of audio below) is not on the LDPCSD website considering PETER KAMPA was just hired only the month before and given complete control of our former SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Interesting yeah?
So here is our Lake Don Pedro Community Services District (LDPCSD), a California Special District incidentally, being completely controlled by a former rogue employee from 20 years earlier who was unethically brought back into the LDPCSD through a CLOSED GM RECRUITMENT PROCESS to insure only PETER KAMPA could be the replacement General Manager. So what does this 20 year CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSOCIATION (CSDA) professional Board Director do when totally in control of a SPECIAL DISTRICT? Anything he wanted including selling out every single legitimate water customer of our district along with the concept and purpose of a California Special District! What an example.
(Come to think of it, even the meeting where KAMPA was appointed “supreme commander of the district” in October 2014 is missing from the LDPCSD website as well.)
Shoot! That reminds me, still haven’t heard a response from Kampa’s replacement GM about my request for public information regarding Kampa’s communications with the SWRCB and how terribly confused the WATER RIGHTS DIVISION is regarding WL11395 and the legal PLACE OF USE (POU) for Merced River water in Lake Don Pedro.
Yup, still no information on that request. Almost like someone is hiding something, yeah? So many things to do….lol
(RECALL: When in OCT 2014 Kampa was appointed GM? and eventually Treasurer with complete access to over one million in cash obtained through the last successful PROP 218 to raise our water rates and fees—- look what became of that cash – Kampa’s pocket book for district expansion for his past annexation interests with groundwater wells! BUSTED!
Yet now they want to raise rates and fees again with the promise of doing what they should have done the first time? Where’s the promise they will not redirect this next rate increase in the same way for other special interests? What happened to the service to the MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS of the LDP subdivision?
Recall how Kampa became GM through acceptance of a management contract that was already prepared and awaiting signature due to confidential board information being passed on to Kampa in advance by his long time friend, and outside POU commercial cattle rancher, Director Emery Ross.
REM? The meeting where I had to leave due to being sick to my stomach because our board would even consider such an irresponsible appointment ON THE SPOT WITHOUT ANY REASONABLE RESEARCH OR INVESTIGATION AS TO KAMPA’S PRIOR EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH THE LDPCSD? Performance which clearly indicated he was a ROGUE EMPLOYEE PURSUING HIS OWN PRIVATE AND BUSINESS INTERESTS WITH PUBLIC AUTHORITY AND FUNDS aka, without board direction or approval. Kampa was only finishing up on what he started 20 years ago with his special interest annexations into our district.)
The little excerpt below (the next meeting after Kampa’s appointment) clearly indicates (in Kampa’s OWN WORDS) that DESPITE HIS YEARS OF PRIOR EXPERIENCE WITH WATER LICENSE 11395, and the related decades of POU (PLACE OF USE) TUMULTUOUS LEGAL ISSUES RIGHT HERE IN LAKE DON PEDRO, PETE KAMPA NEVER ONCE CONSIDERED THE LEGAL PLACE OF USE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER WHEN SETTING UP FUNDING FOR HIS PLAN TO EXPAND EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION TO LAFCO ANNEXATIONS WITH GOVERNMENT GRANTS…. WHICH WERE ALSO APPARENTLY APPLIED FOR AND OBTAINED THROUGH FURNISHING FALSE INFORMATION AS TO OUR ACTUAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES and SERVICES. The infamous KAMPA FAKE WL11395 POU MAP! And what have we discovered since then? Kampa was aware of even further outside POU properties that were NEVER REPORTED FOR LICENSE COMPLIANCE purposes.
An absolute betrayal of the 99% of legal customers of the LDPCSD. There’s more too (that I just found- or rather rediscovered while organizing information…. damn good thing I had my own personal recordings of these meetings) which I’ll try to post soon – but I have much on my plate right now (more on later too). Anyway, hope all is well with you folks and as always, my best to you and yours, Lew
Damn good question.
Here’s another:
IS IT WORTH YEARS OF HARDSHIP, FRUSTRATION, AND PAIN TO PURSUE WHAT IS ETHICALLY, MORALLY, AND LEGALLY CORRECT DESPITE THE STATUS QUO OF WELL DEFENDED CORRUPTION?
REM what was said about the new groundwater wells and how they would be used? ….
“While these groundwater wells will provide water supply temporarily, wells in this area are unreliable as a permanent solution due to the fractured rock formations present. These groundwater wells will be kept and used on
an emergency basis once a permanent water supply solution is developed and constructed.”
Groundwater well plan.
Groundwater well project as completed.
Groundwater wells as currently used for properties outside WL11395 Place of Use and future services.
Three entirely different positions and
MR WECspays for them all!
MBTYAY, Lew
~
December 13th, 2018
THANKS FRANK
Phew. Well, there goes another 15 minutes of your life down the tubes, eh? Lol (Ref last “Give Us” video-“almost music” presentation ) [GOOD NEWS EVERYONE (Farnsworth! lol) – only added 20 seconds or so to the overall video time by chopping some of the clouds out……BAD NEWS….realized (too late) and got my COMMUNITY confused with my COMMON! lol COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENT…..NOT COMMUNITY INTEREST DEVELOPMENT. Oh well, stuff happens.
Really hate to rush projects like that but there are always other legitimate competing interests at play screaming for adequate time as well. So WWW? (So Where Were We) Need to get back to that someday, thought it a good idea at the time (OOPS!) ….humm, maybe this should be a returning quick blah blah blah?)
Continuation of the GIVE US SONG (GUS)? Yes, not sure if this will work – not so much of a resurrection of a past project. but more like incremental completions or fine tunings time did not permit (regular tuning of the guitar might help as well because I’ll put a project away for a while then pick up later without tuning – bad habit since the differing temperatures in the house change everything. – we’ll just file that with other excuses, shall we? lol)
Anyway, here’s the first major addendum to this little experiment: Recall how in the original the Tarantula called for “more”? Well, here’s the part I was working on at the time but could not finish for posting. No biggie really, just one more missing tooth from the smile I was attempting to encourage in your mind/face.
THANK YOU FRANK ZAPPA
Boy. No doubt I’m going to step into it again because without an extremely carefully prepared detailed explanation, chances of miscommunication are probably quite high, but here it is never-the-less.
Generally I believe we have all been influenced by others (and environments) in profound ways, both good and bad, that have irrevocably changed or influenced our lives in some fashion. Everything from fairly insignificant stuff that assists in developing/defining our individual tastes for say food, art, music, etc. to major life changing events that are exceptionally life altering, for one reason or another in respect to what is considered “normal” (whatever the heck that is! lol).
WHOA! Even I can see arguments popping up all over the above paragraph, but again, this little journey has been about MY EXPRESSION of what I believe, think, feel, etc., not what is, or might be, appropriate for anyone else. (ie, experience may only provide the stimulus for us to positively make required changes in our lives (good or bad) that we believe beneficial or desirable at the time.
Obviously, I express myself publicly primarily through this website. A WEB Log or blog. And just like people, there are many different types of “blogging” and variations of expressive communication, presentation styles, but they generally orbit around some centralized theme, interest, purpose, concept, etc.
Think of lakedonpedro.org as only a glimpse into my grey matter about what I personally believe or think about any particular subject I thought worthy of my “blah blah blah blogging” at the time. Certainly not the final word on ANYTHING…..except what I thought at the moment I chose to publish the material – heck, my strongly held opinion in these Lake Don Pedro CSD matters could dramatically change in the beat of a heart with factual evidence strong enough to encourage a different perspective and conclusion. Listening to other perspectives or opinions is always useful in formulating an opinion about something. That is what is so curious about this OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE CONTROVERSY – WHERE ARE THE DEFENDERS OF THIS UNETHICAL AND LIKELY ILLEGAL LDPCSD UNWRITTEN POLICY SPANNING DECADES?
However, even after years of searching for this different “interpretation of known facts” (and requesting public information in hopes of explaining this continuing nightmare) I am still, unfortunately, of the opinion the LDPCSD was a sham of an organization specifically formed to surreptitiously get “local hooks into WL11395” for distribution of MERCED RIVER WATER anywhere THE SPECIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS WANTED FOR THEIR OUTSIDE WATER LICENSE POU (Place of Use) DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
IMAGINE only 88 people voting yes encumbered thousands of property owners within the subdivision.
88 votes.
Yes, I know, sounds terribly sinister and conspiratorial, but seriously, hasn’t 40 years of community turmoil been enough? The Lake Don Pedro subdivision has suffered the most – it’s most precious natural resource AND GREATEST PROPERTY SELLING POINT has been incrementally “liberated” from the legal PLACE OF USE (POU) and provided to property owners OUTSIDE THE SUBDIVISION who have a variety of proposed uses. Uses which may be prohibited in the very subdivision from which they intend to receive water for their project because of subdivision CC&Rs – but hey! properties outside that CID POA subdivision don’t have CC&Rs!. Imagine, supplying water to an adjacent proposed subdivision which claims to be much better than the “failing Lake Don Pedro subdivision” whose thousands of owners have been quietly financing (subsidizing) such special interest groundwater substitution water service for all properties outside the legal POU subdivision for decades, and now, current LDPCSD leadership/management intend to expand this special benefit water service even further!
Where was the LDPOA (Lake Don Pedro Owners Association) VOICE in defending this most valuable property asset and required development resource? Ahhhh, some of the same people expanding water service outside the subdivision back then were involved in the POA. wow. Imagine that. Conflict of interest regulations only develop after negative ramifications experienced in the past right? Things are different now. Not quite as blatant but I digress.
As said before, who can seriously blame a property owner who simply wanted water to develop their foothill dream?
If water service was provided outside the legal boundary of the operating water license restrictions, seems to me it was a violation committed by those charged with the duty of legally operating the water company and hooking up the meter and providing the service and billing. It was the district committing the wrong, not the consumer asking for water (this assumes of course there was no illegal under the table arrangements made by the consumer/customer such as bribes, pay-offs, land-real estate deals, etc. used as consideration for the illegal service – because then the consumer would be just as guilty of wrongdoing. ie, bribing public officials to provide services known to be prohibited by law.
Yup, baring criminal activity on their part, it would be unreasonable to blame a property owner for just asking if water service was available and receiving such. For some reason I think of blaming a child for having bad teeth when the parent/guardian routinely provides too much candy. But I digress.
WWW? Oh yeah, can’t blame a property owner wanting to live in these beautiful foothills…..
I certainly do not. But…….STOP! What sort of dream was that exactly because THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS.
Dream of buying or building a home and living in these beautiful western Sierra Nevada foothills? If that is the goal – “GOOD NEWS EVERYONE” (as Professor Farnsworth says on the animated television program FUTURAMA. SIDE NOTE: one episode of Futurama dealt with one of Farnsworth’s crazy projects dealing with time travel that was only waiting for sufficient funding through (are you ready?) DUMP TRUCK LOADS OF FLAMING GRANT MONEY – lol),…. anyway,
…..so if living in the foothills is the goal – the LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION has had several hundred parcels to chose from in both TUOLUMNE COUNTY and MARIPOSA COUNTY for decades— ready for more “GOOD NEWS EVERYONE”?—- EVERY SINGLE PROPERTY IN THAT SUBDIVISION (in this highly drought prone region) IS ENTITLED TO QUALITY MERCED RIVER WATER straight from Yosemite National Park which is then impounded behind Merced Irrigation District Exchequer Dam forming Lake McClure – where it is then pumped, treated, stored and distributed to subdivision property owners (vacant parcel owners only have to ask for service connection and it MUST BE PROVIDED!)
Ahhhh, but here lies the problem…… some of those having dreams of living in this area SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED THE SUBDIVISION THAT WAS ENTITLED TO THE WATER preferring to purchase land outside a common interest development TO AVOID THAT WHOLE OTHER LAYER OF GOVERNMENT IN THE FORM OF A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND CCRS.
Some land “developers”, set on making money a different way, do not want Lake Don Pedro subdivision property with quality water(and originally intended subdivision infrastructure), but rather, just the subdivision quality water on their property (far majority with additional infrastructure requirements) so they can build whatever they want without the much more restrictive subdivision CC&Rs.
OBVIOUSLY OUTSIDE THE LEGAL SUBDIVISION MEANS it is – ILLEGAL to provide Merced River Water! AND THEY KNEW THIS MANY YEARS BEFORE THE LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT WAS FORMED IN AUGUST OF 1980!
Thus the continuing LDPCSD SPECIAL BENEFIT program to pump groundwater (with extremely expensive and unreliable groundwater wells paid for by subdivision entitled water users) to the treatment plant, remove the arsenic and other contaminants, blend it with the quality Merced River water, and sell and pipe it outside the subdivision to the land owners in other areas for their water service. Yup, all that extra equipment, processing, monitoring, reporting, etc. paid for by MR WECs who does not require groundwater replacement for their water service within the residential subdivision. (ok…ready for large print? Not yelling, just don’t want you to miss it. lol)
PLUS!
The thousands ofMR WECs(now and for perpetuity) must consume a “BLENDED WATER PRODUCT” specifically created so that water could be distributed OUTSIDE THEIR INTENDED SUBDIVISION!
(The state water board evidently permits this under the theory of “GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION” although I have not read where such substitution of groundwater for surface water (lake) is permitted for the specific purpose of CIRCUMVENTING CLEAR WATER RESTRICTIONS in the operative license. Seems to me (and I am nobody but a victim customer here too) for such a SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM to be fair and equitable, ALL PARTIES SHOULD BE LEGALLY ENTITLED WATER USERS IN THE FIRST PLACE.)
ANYWAY, lakedonpedro.org (as well as any other opinion/commentary type posting sites) can only express a previously held opinion at that time of posting. (Seriously, think about it…. Until we are “linked” with something that can transmit and receive our simultaneous “bio-electrical signals” of thought and action, who really knows what another may or may not think or believe?) I still wait for another legitimate interpretation of this outside WL11395 POU mess but fear the responsible parties are only sanitizing their records for the next wave of misrepresentation to achieve their goals. Oh what a tangled web eh? Seems like, as humans operating under our all too common A&I (apathy & ignorance), we only pack our troubles – like luggage for any trip – even if escaping and moving to our dream Lunar Lot.
Anyway, back to Frank.
Already mentioned my appreciation for Frank Zappa and his presentations before – I recall the photos (don’t know if post or page), – but you should know me by now… it’s a real personality flaw, I repeat things a lot. I mean a lot. An awful lot. really, I do. A lot. Lol
The below two Frank Zappa albums,
Joe’ Garage part I,
and Joe’s Garage parts II and III,
influenced my taste and appreciation for a different form of music long ago. Sure, some might argue an unfortunate occurrence during my impressionable formative adolescent years, lol, yet I believe it was actually a wonderfully intended gift from a brilliant composing/performing musical artist far ahead of his time.
Please, understand my appreciation for Zappa’s expression did not/does not equate to agreeing with whatever presented, or what might appear to be advocated (under that inclusive umbrella recognized as entertainment) such as the album cover utilizing “Blackface” or the humorous audio robotic porno-episodes unveiled in song, (other album graphic art was pretty wild too) – but rather, it was for the unique style of his presentations coupled with Zappa’s exquisite skill and performance abilities.
What were four defining aspects of Zappa’s lifetime work? Nonconformity, free form expression, sound experiments (1963 Steve Allen Show where Zappa plays a bicycle wheel), and satire (lots of highly political stuff – like when congress tackled VOLUNTARY LABELING FOR ALBUMS (Frank Zappa and the MOTHERS OF PREVENTION ALBUM – instead of invention LOL)
Yup, Frank Zappa did not connect with everyone, which again, is neither good or bad (I would say unfortunate) just an observation regarding personal preferences, but for those that his music did touch……altering.
“THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER”
During Joe’s musical journey through these two albums the “Central Scrutinizer”, a robotic digitized voice, narrates the action and fills in missing pieces to the story (really should be a movie – guess in some ways many of the components have already been illustrated in film) which is hilarious in itself with his little side comments of perspective and attempts at humor.
Yes indeed nothing new about the last video and my “almost music” composition with that reoccurring robotic voice – as a matter of fact, if anything, only 20 – 30 years stale! lol
Look what’s happened since then. Who could afford the required equipment back then to make such sounds? Only the pioneers and those truly dedicated to becoming successful in the tough “dog eat dog” entertainment industry. Ever notice how a musical innovation may be introduced by a particular artist/group then suddenly that “sound” is reproduced everywhere? Just like everything else I suppose. The USA develops a stealth fighter then suddenly adversaries are sporting the same technology in their aircraft. Of course entity infiltration, espionage, theft, etc. fuels that repetitive cycle and it goes on and on in many different situations.
OLD FOR PROS, NEW FOR LEW
How things change, eh? What was once large and expensive is now small and affordable. (Not sure, but didn’t I tell you about how I paid $80 overseas for a state of the art hand held Panasonic calculator with only the four functions of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division? And how when I returned stateside calculators (with advanced functions) were being given away free with a carton of cigarettes? WIlD!) Anyway, I use a small hand held digitized recorder, Casio keyboard, Yamaha Guitar and a harmonica Mom sent in a Christmas “CARE PACKAGE” years ago. I combine whatever those might finally produce with scribbled musings and wannabe poetic lyrics. Perfect combination yeah? Wannabe lyrics and almost music!
Anyway, the other night I was reflecting on some of the problem audio tracks and suddenly realized that even with those headaches of program crashes/lost material, incompetent planning, and lack of skills, the process never-the-less was fun, made me feel good – almost young again! That classic pounding beat with a meandering flow of melodies was relaxing and comfortable. I could express what I truly felt to others in a form that was comfortable. I could breath easier, feel the sound, and think clearer – rather like I’m feeling and thinking right now, which is, thank you Frank, rest in peace.
Frank Zappa died Dec 4th, 1993 in Hollywood Hills, CA
The OAN (One America News) Channel has been running a couple of commercials highlighting portions of some old Malcolm X speeches/statements, yet eventhis EXCELLENT SOURCE FOR FAST & ACCURATE NEWS uses material with inaccurate captioning.
Does this suggest some sort of “universal captioning process” by particular entities doing most of the television captioning for whatever is presented to the public? (Is it “captioning software”?)
Who/what is confusing information that should be presented in a clear understandable form?
ANYWAY, while listening to this commercial (while engaged in doing something else) I couldn’t understand a particular word so I looked up at the television to view the captioning for clarification (keep it on because it is sometimes correct – lol) only to see the word “forced”. “Strange,I don’t recall hearing the word forced in that speech” I said to myself – prompting the impromptu research of what was presented versus actually spoken.
CAPTIONING:
“When you live in a poor neighborhood you’re living in an area where you have forced to when you have four schools you have poor teachers? When you have poor teachers you get a poor education when you have poor education you can only work on? The job and you live again in a poor neighborhood. So it’s a vicious cycle.”
NOW, WHAT WAS ACTUALLY SAID:
“When you live in a poor neighborhood you’re living in an area where you have poor schools. When you have poor schools you have poor teachers. When you have poor teachers you get a poor education. When you have poor education you can only work on a poor paying job and you live, again, in a poor neighborhood so it is a very vicious cycle. We have a self help program, a do it yourself philosophy and the best place to start is right in the community where we live.”
Yes, I realize: the time allotted dictates commercial speed and the available space for text, just seems like another way of presenting the information might preserve the brilliance of this cause and effect observation. Perhaps more words in larger “blocks” super-imposed, or layered, on the background video image? Must be some way to protect the integrity of the thought process because, after all, this obviously wasn’t a “live performance”. Not only inaccurate but seems disrespectful to the original author.
My best to you and yours, Lew
???????
Just a thought. ???
Saturday, OCTOBER 27th, 2018
Peculiar. Look at the timing of the LAFCo creation of the Lake Don Pedro CSD, in August of 1980.
What had just happened only a month before regarding water license 11395that the LDPCSD has used since that creation?
July 24, 1980: STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROOF OF MAXIMUM BENEFICIAL USE OF WATER UNDER THE LICENSE – the Merced River was fully appropriated — then the next month Mariposa County LAFCO apparently secretly expands the water service area outside the Lake Don Pedro residential subdivision 5 months before the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) approved the transfer of Sierra Highland’s facility and assets to the new district effective February 1981!
Everyone knew exactly what the CPUC was prepared to approve as a service area for the new district and all these “PROPOSED OUTSIDE POU WATER SERVICES FOR LAFCO ANNEXATIONS” were clearly not accepted in the transfer. Such OUTSIDE POU water agreements WERE NOT TO BECOME OBLIGATIONS OF THE NEW DISTRICT!
Yup, the service area was evidently greatly, and quietly, expanded beyond the Place of Use restrictions only weeks after the State of California declared the Merced River fully appropriated and the water per WL11395 was being used to maximum beneficial use.
Is this the SIMPLE EXPLANATION as to why the original water service boundary map created in 1980 (based on the existing 11 pages of metes and bounds survey language) has never been produced in 38 years despite multiple requests from various individuals and government entities?
Because it would evidence the major differences in the APPROVED LDPCSD WATER SERVICE AREA by the State Water Board, the CPUC, and the POU restrictions contained in WL11395 – with what is represented by Mariposa County LAFCO, and “interpreted” by LDPCSD GM Pete Kampa?
Could that original map possibly be “interpreted” as evidence of a sophisticated and calculated deception in creating a special services district to gain access to WL11395 which could then be surreptitiously exploited into developing the vast acreage of rural foothill grazing lands within Tuolumne and Mariposa counties? What a benefit to those local governments and their land development speculators who don’t want to finance their own groundwater wells.
Yup. Foothill development with a special benefit groundwater substitution program paid for by the unorganized and oblivious thousands of MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS OF THE Lake Don Pedro residential subdivision (half absentee owners) who were the perfect perpetual victims since they are mandatory customers of the LDPCSD due to CCRs which run with their subdivision property purchase! Can’t escape, can’t drill their own private water wells and must pay whatever the LDPCSD demands regardless of the fact the district has violated every single characteristic of a California Special District.
No defined geographic area of service – or map of such service area; the defined group of entitled customers in the subdivision has been, and continues to be, expanded beyond the POU, and water service charges are much more expensive due to the district simultaneously providing a special benefit groundwater substitution program for LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES outside the POU which our district has no legal duty or moral obligation to provide water service. This appears to be a “gift” of public funds and resources for private land developer benefit.
Counties get all the development inspection and permitting fees, taxes due, and such without the financial liability of having to provide those necessary and extremely expensive groundwater wells in a drought prone area.
This whole thing stinks and the fact that extremely important public records regarding these LAFCO ANNEXATIONS into the Lake Don Pedro CSD have been denied to the public for inspection is disconcerting and only encourages distrust.
Below is a link to some interesting reading about water right Due Diligence in western states:
PROPOSED LAW SECTION 1. Statement of Findings and Purposes.(a)California’s taxes on gasoline and car ownership are among the highest in the nation. (b) These taxes have been raised without the consent of the people. (c) Therefore, the people hereby amend the Constitution to require voter approval of the recent increase in the gas and car tax enacted by Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2017 and any future increases in the gas and car tax. SEC. 2. Voter Approval for Increases in Gas and Car Tax. SEC. 2.1. Section 3.5 is added to Article XIII A of the California Constitution, to read: seC. 3.5. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Legislature shall not impose, increase or extend any tax, as defined in Section 3, on the sale, storage, use, or consumption of motor vehicle gasoline or diesel fuel, or on the privilege of a resident of California to operate on the public highways a vehicle or trailer coach, unless and until that proposed tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote. (b) This section does not apply to taxes on motor vehicle gasoline or diesel fuel, or on the privilege of operating a vehicle or trailer coach at the rates that were in effect on January 1, 2017. Any increase in the rate of such taxes imposed after January 1, 2017, shall cease to be imposed unless and until approved by the electorate as required by this section.
The entire proposition was
Less than half a page- distinguished from others
Yet still this clear common sense proposal
Was corrupted with party druthers.
AG restated “repeal the gas tax”
Transformed it into threatened losses
For better roads, bridges, and infrastructure
Failing due to current political bosses.
Just like our CSD GM
When officials consistently misrepresent fact
What they are doing is likely a scam
When integrity is something they lack.
I for one will vote yes on Prop 6
They already stole illegal fire tax funds
A CA surplus without ethical bounds?
Time to change how California runs.
Retired Judge Steven Bailey
Is absolutely correct on this:
Answers are not “party limited”
And “right answers” will not miss!
That other party is “off the rail”
For average USA supporting constituents
Apparently morphing into aggressive mobs
Of disrespectful often paid miscreants.
My party isn’t perfect either
Yet it meets most serious concerns
Republic form of democracy, strong national defense,
Honest public service, and together, the rest we can earn.
?????&&&&&!!!!!
California Public Records Act Government Code §6250, et seq.
The purpose of the California Public Records Act (CPRA) is to enable the public to have access to information needed to monitorthe functioning of government. The public has a right to inspect public records during the office hours of any government agency and to request and obtain copies of records subject to the payment of fees covering the direct costs of duplication or a statutory fee if applicable. The CPRA contains a number of exemptions for certain classes of documents. These exemptions generally cover documents that are privileged or confidential, or which would infringe on the individual right to privacy. Examples of some common exemptions include documents protected by attorney client
privilege, attorney work products, preliminary draft documents not retained by the agency in the ordinary course of business, and personnel records for which the disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
HOWDY! It is Saturday, October 20th, 2018 and looks to be a beautiful day up here in the foothills of Lake Don Pedro.
Did a quick check of the MARIPOSA COUNTY WEBSITE FOR LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) RESOLUTIONS but 13 years of official LAFCO records still have not been posted for public review. I am still looking for legitimate information regarding the DOSCHER/LAKE SHORE RANCH proposed 900 acre residential subdivision across the street from the LDPCSD administration office which was stated to have been approved for DISTRICT ANNEXATION in 1995 when Kampa was here the first time, yet was actively kept a secret from the public and board members until early in 2014 only a few months before Pete Kampa returned through an unethical “closed recruitment process” for GM.
The announcement that the property had been approved was agreed to between LAFCO and LDPCSD officials in a “semi-closed public meeting” in Mariposa to update the LAFCO manual. Strange, I had been planning on attending that meeting for some time with one of the civilian commissioners, Ken Kennedy also from Lake Don Pedro – and was even going to catch a ride with him to Mariposa. Then all of a sudden both the LDPCSD President and GM repeatedly advised that I could not attend due to the Brown Act and the fact outside WL11395 Place of Use commercial cattle rancher and sitting LDPCSD Director Emery Ross was going to attend with the CSD president. (A quorum of directors could be considered a Brown Act violation if all participated in LDPCSD business decisions without proper notice to the public of the meeting. I contend Ross should not have been there to begin with due to his conflict of interest in being an outside WL11395 POU customer receiving special benefit GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION and being on record as to advocating further outside POU water service for other LAFCO annexations.)
What? Emery Ross runs a commercial cattle ranching business outside the POU of WL11395 with chlorinated water intended for domestic human consumption for the residential subdivision! Considering the concept of CONFLICT OF INTEREST – how could Emery Ross be attending a meeting discussing whether certain property had previously (much less legally) been annexed into the district when Ross had clearly circumvented the repeated denials by the LDPCSD in refusing GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION SERVICES for his proposed cattle ranch – yet Ross has been successfully watering his cattle for over 20 years with a water meter belonging to another cattle rancher? What is more, as a result of that investigation, it turned out there were several other properties also received GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION WATER SERVICE through water meters wrongfully taken from that same rancher.
Why would a clearly SPECIAL INTEREST DIRECTOR be permitted to attend that “SEMI CLOSED MEETING” when another sitting LDPCSD director had no such CONFLICT OF INTEREST and had studied the POU matter for almost four years but denied access?
That is unless of course, LAFCO and the LDPCSD wanted a unanimous decision by all those involved THAT A PROPOSED 900 acre residential subdivision had been annexed in 1995 just as the Mariposa County Planning Director and LAFCO Executive Officer later relayed to me in Mariposa. Sorry, don’t believe this story.
What I have seen of that annexation record is extremely unprofessional and clearly lacking in basic information and also appears to have been resuscitated many times during on again, off again annexation attempts by the LDPCSD. Even the proper name of the project is unreadable in the alleged approved annexation resolution. (The possibility exists that multiple poorly constructed annexation resolutions (with limited information) have been utilized and merged to produce the purported annexation of this special project of Pete Kampa’s from over twenty years ago during 1994-1997 when he started his infamous career in the California water industry?)
The fact extremely important LAFCO annexation records are still not on the Mariposa County website is frustrating and I believe cause for concern for anyone who believes in the concept of TRANSPARENCY OF GOVERNMENT PROCESS. If everything was above board and legal, why isn’t that information posted on the website for public review and research? Why have repeated requests to the Mariposa County Planning Department/LAFCO not even received a courtesy acknowledgement of receipt or reasonable explanation as to why the requested information is not provided? (My original request was actually dictated by the Planning Director/LAFCO Executive in front of another Planning Department witness inside the Planning Department Office when I questioned how the request should best be written!)
Pertinent records for years 1996-2004 and 2015-2018 are still absent. Why if such annexations into the LDPCSD were following LAFCO and other related laws as to how properties should be annexed for special district services.
Gosh, and now we find out that PETE KAMPA was working with CSDA and CALAFCO up in Sacramento during 2016 on the proper formation of LAFCOs? This state is in severe trouble with “SPECIAL DISTRICT CHARACTERS” like Pete Kampa orchestrating the “proper way” to do things between LAFCOs and SPECIAL DISTRICTS. Consider the districts Kampa has exploited since transplanting his apparent ultra liberal European socialist agenda into the Lake Don Pedro area in 1993.
WHY ARE OVER A DOZEN YEARS OF PUBLIC RECORDS MISSING FROM THE MARIPOSA COUNTY WEBSITE UNDER THE TITLE LAFCO RESOLUTIONS?
(1996-2004 and 2015-2018)
Are these records being studied by interested law enforcement entities or simply “sanitized” to removed all the suspicious indications of substandard work, special interest tampering or corruption? Did Mariposa County Planning usurp the LAFCO resolution business for those years? What has happened to LAFCO in Mariposa County? Seems much of the LAFCO process has been taken over by the Planning Department.
**************************
HELLO! Below is the link to that thesis I mentioned in the last post – gets a little technical in places but worth the time. Feel like I have actually been to McCloud now and certainly recognized some of the topics such as dysfunctional development reliant upon natural resource extraction. More later – I’m out of time again! later, Lew
Pete Kampa’s potential connection with European interests exploiting “the Waters of the United States of America” for business profitcertainly wouldn’t be earth shattering news considering his reported past employment as General Manager of Delft University, Netherlands (I seriously doubt he was permitted to “remote manage” that position), AND his special interest management activities assisting LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) ANNEXED PROPERTIES he worked with 20 years ago when starting his infamous water career here at the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District (LDPCSD).
You may recall that all these COUNTY LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES (located in both Tuolumne and Mariposa) must be served with an ALTERNATE SOURCE of water to actually develop the various proposed projects (which even includes an adjacent – therefore “competing subdivision” next to the MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION).
“Alternate source water” in the drought prone fractured rock foothills of the Lake Don Pedro area meant developing extremely expensive and often unreliable GROUNDWATER WELLSto produce the “REPLACEMENT WATER” for every unit of MERCED RIVER WATERfrom Lake McClure that LEAVES THE ENTITLED SUBDIVISION AND GOLF COURSE AREA to THESE LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES.
WHY?
(you know this one)
BEC
WHY?
(you know this one)
BECAUSE LAFCO ANNEXATIONS ARE OUTSIDE THE PLACE OF USE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER per WATER LICENSE 11395.
Sure, LAFCO could “annex” those other properties into the “LDPCSD DISTRICT BOUNDARY” but not the boundary that really meant something for projects requiring water –
THE PLACE OF USE BOUNDARY PER THE STATE WATER LICENSE!
Which is under the jurisdiction of……????
YES!
THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
aka
STATE WATER BOARD!
Gosh, all this sounds so familiar…..do I repeat myself? I was asking myself that just yesterday.
Hum, do I repeat myself?
🙂
$$$$$$$$$$$
Monday, June 25th, 2018
I wonder……
HAS MID “STEPPED BACK” FROM LICENSE INTEGRITY RESPONSIBILITIES WITH “SILENT SUPPORT” FOR “KAMPA-GANDA” ATTEMPTED POU CHANGE?
ANY SUGGESTION OF ACTIVE PARTICIPATION WITH “KAMPA LDPCSD” IN MISREPRESENTING THE LONG ESTABLISHED WL11395 POU SINCE 2014? BEFORE THAT?
WHEN WAS MID FIRST MADE AWARE OF MERCED RIVER WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE POU?
WHAT ACTIONS WERE TAKEN TO STOP AND PREVENT FUTURE WATER RIGHT VIOLATIONS?
HASN’T MID PROPOSED, ADVOCATED, NEGOTIATED AND APPROVED ANNEXATIONS OUTSIDE THEIR OWN WL11395 IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE ANNEXED OWNER’S WATER RIGHTS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THE LDPCSD WOULD PROVIDE FUTURE WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE THEIR LICENSE POU FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT?
WASN’T THE PINEY CREEK LARGE “SERVICE ISLAND” OF LAFCO ANNEXATIONS BASED ON OBTAINING WATER RIGHTS THAT ULTIMATELY WERE LATER DISCOVERED NOT TO HAVE EXISTED AFTER ANNEXATION INTO THE LDPCSD SERVICE AREA THAT WAS STILL OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED POU FOR MERCED RIVER WATER?
WERE THE ABOVE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT INTENDED BENEFITS ESSENTIALLY PAID FOR WITH A CORRESPONDING IMPOSED FINANCIAL BURDEN/LIABILITY ON THE LDPCSD AND MR WECsTO PROVIDE AN EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE “ALTERNATE SOURCE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM” IN THE FUTURE TO CIRCUMVENT THE POU RESTRICTIONS IN MID’S LICENSE REGARDING MERCED RIVER WATER DIVERSION AND USE?
A GRANT FUNDING PLAN TO PROVIDE GROUNDWATER WELLS FOR “ALTERNATE SOURCE WATER PRODUCTION” FOR VARIOUS LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES WOULD HAVE BEEN QUITE HELPFUL, YEAH?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$
???
Now June 2018? Had our first day of Summer already?
Phew! Time flies when you get preoccupied with what appears to have all the earmarks of a continuing CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO SUBSTITUTE AN INCORRECT WATER LICENSE PLACE OF USE “shapefile” (digital map) obtained from a conditionally approved 1993 project that failed to meet state development conditions and was abandoned FOR THE OFFICIAL, AND LEGITIMATE, WL11395 POU MAP on file with the SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board) since June 1978.
[IMPORTANT NOTE AS TO PRIOR POU ATTEMPTED DECEPTION FROM THE BEGINNING:
The prior 1977 POU MAP, initially submitted to the state for licensing purposes, was apparently found to have included NUMEROUS PROPERTIES RESERVING FUTURE WATER that were not entitled to Merced River water per WL11395 (INCLUDING KAMPAS “SLUMBERING 1995 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION) – as was also clearly documented in the January 1981CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (CPUC) Transfer of Facilities and Assets of Sierra Highlands Water Company to the August 1980 LAFCO FORMED Lake Don Pedro CSD.
The 1977 INCORRECT MAP is what PETE KAMPA continues to display on the LDPCSD WEBSITE which is a great example of his arrogant and contemptuous disregard for the truth much less our legal system of justice in this country.
SIDE NOTE: POSSIBLE NETHERLANDS CONNECTION? Kampa was doing this “if you’re not going to use all this water I know property owners who will” attitude in Lake Don Pedro in 1994. Prior internet advertisements for his KAMPA COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, llc aka KAMPACS, special district management company, reported he had been manager and general manager at Delft University, Netherlands. While researching property ownership laws I ran across the “squatter movement” in the Netherlands. Absolutely wild. I ended up watching a 1+ hour film documentary on the issue entitled “THE STREET IS OURS” “De stad was van ons” “The city was ours” — fortunately it had English captioning.
Not that it necessarily has anything to do with what Kampa was doing in Lake Don Pedro around the same time period, but what was happening in the Netherlands where Kampa likely was before being hired here in the United States in 1994?
Due to widespread homelessness in the country, especially cities, organized gangs of homeless people were breaking into various vacant homes, apartments, commercial buildings, etc., and claiming the property has their home despite repeated requests (and some violence) by the lawful owners of the property for the trespassers to leave. I believe the phrase “use it or loose it” was used in this particular “squatting documentary” but I’m not going to spend almost and hour and a half to review it again – especially since I also watched a couple of videos regarding individuals claiming an adverse possession to another person’s property in the Netherlands. I believe this “squatters movement” also occurred in San Francisco a decade or two earlier. The rationale was, “why should a building sit vacant if a bunch of people could live in it instead of on the street?” Can you imagine the destruction, vandalism and health concerns if there was no running water, electric, or sewer and sanitation disposal service? So what happens? The judicial system upholds that the “squatters could stay” if they had certain common household furniture and necessities in the occupied buildings so the squatters would cause a disturbance in one part of the region to draw law enforcement while simultaneously breaking into buildings in the city and hauling truck and bus loads of furniture and such for placement in the “squatted building” to prove residency! Anyway, this adversarial possession stuff continued for a while until someone purchased the property and negotiated a settlement with the squatters, with some of them surprisingly quite angry that such a settlement obviously recognized a new owner of the property they were adversely possessing.
The United States of America is not the Netherlands.
We are a republican form of democracy with a Constitution that protects the rights of each individual citizen.
Our system of government does not operate by a simple direct majority type rule that can arbitrarily violate the rights of the individual because it might be more convenient.
Taking someone’s building under some adverse possession rationalized cry of “use it or lose it” might work in the Netherlands but not in this country. Other than situations of eminent domain proceedings in the name of pubic good it is the property owners right to do what he wants with his own property so long as it conforms to established land use regulations of that jurisdiction.
A water right violation is a trespass also. Someone’s RIGHT to water per the license has been trespassed upon when the “licensed water” is put to other uses or used in areas outside the PLACE OF USE authorized in the license.
Thank Heavens there are SWRCB employees hired, trained and dedicated to enforcing the laws of this state in protecting the rights of water license holders and other junior users of this precious natural resource.
SURE WOULD LIKE TO MEET ONE.
OK, let’s see if I can figure out how to post this as a new page for 2018 (just in case I decide to “drop in” next year! lol
I KNEW THIS CURRENT BLAH BLAH BLAH SOUNDED FAMILIAR!
Just found a draft WITH the film link!
???
Was Pete Kampa hired by the LDPCSD in 1994 to continue the same type of LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) expansion of district water services previously attempted/accomplished by his predecessor General Manager Wes Snyder who was the first GM inherited from the prior SIERRA HIGHLANDS WATER COMPANY?
(OH YEAH, our 50 year old consulting engineers (who have also been pushing expansion since BEFORE LDPCSD FORMATION in August 1980) announced (June 18th, 2018 agenda packet) they are leaving and we need a new engineering consultant. Gee, wonder what qualifications KAMPA will accept for his purposes? His proposed selection process was very detailed and outlined much information that the engineer should have but DID NOT MENTION THE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM one time that I could see strange, don’t you think?)
DID PETE KAMPA PLANT THE SEEDS FOR FURTHER annexed property water demand 20 years earlier
UTILIZING PUBLIC FUNDS & RESOURCES,
LETTING DEMAND GROW with special interest organized district dysfunction and
apparent self-serving assistance of co-operative PARENT COUNTY LAFCOs?
Did he return in 2014 through a BOARD ORCHESTRATED UNETHICAL APPOINTMENT
SELECTION PROCESS AS GENERAL MANAGER AND BOARD TREASURER
with the added cover and assistance of his limited liability management company and a
20 year Board Member affiliation with one of the largest special district and water lobbying associations in the state?
Did he not use one million dollars in LDPCSD cash saved after near bankruptcy and resulting passage of a Prop 218 to leverage government grants?
DID KAMPA MISREPRESENT THE ACTUAL PURPOSE for acquiring those grants
that were intended and conditioned upon exclusive use in assistance of existing customers during historic drought?
Was he SPECIFICALLY ADVISED THE GRANTS WERE NOT FOR INCREASING CUSTOMER CONNECTIONS?
Did KAMPA from the start intend to USE THOSE FURTHER SUBSTANTIAL PUBLIC FUNDS to expand a SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM BY DEVELOPING MORE GROUNDWATER WELLS required for creation of an ALTERNATE SOURCE OF WATER PRODUCTION NEEDED to replace the MERCED RIVER WATERBEING DIVERTED FROM THE SUBDIVISION POU SO AS TO LEGALLY CIRCUMVENT THE PLACE OF USE RESTRICTIONS OF WL11395?
(While simultaneously destroying the intent and purpose of those license restrictions no less.)
Was PETE KAMPA returned to provide the subsidized water necessary for development and ultimate INCREASED PROFIT HARVESTS that he planted 20 years earlier?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Many facts and questions about PETER KAMPA remain unknown and unanswered, from the original board that hired him without a background check, to the one that supports him today despite his continued not telling the truth and repeated attempts at deception. This leaves others concerned about his (& Board’s) suspicious activities in the difficult position of having to surmise, assume, extrapolate, and JUST GUESS at the actual motives for his continuing disingenuous behavior against the interests of <MR WECs> of the LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION.
IF that’s the way they want it?
Fine by me.
Let’s guess!
WHY CONCEAL HIS NETHERLANDS BACKGROUND?
One aspect that I find particularly curious is why PETE KAMPA removed his prior NETHERLANDS EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND from the internet as well as other little tidbits and clues to his past and present activities? Could that Netherlands connection have anything to do with this nation’s recent focus on citizenship status? Indicative of environmental development regarding education, employment, perspectives on personal property ownership, etc. Did Kampa attend and graduate from Delft University? Was Kampa actually employed at Delft University, Netherlands as a manager then General Manager as previously reported?
(Just because the information has been taken down, don’t forget the NSA (National Security Administration) probably has it backed up and stored in Utah! Not sure whether to “lol” on that one or not considering some of my own internet research …ahh, you know, ….emmm, ahhh,…. well,…ahhhhhh..nervously clearing throat…..ahhh, well……. back to the topic in at hand…….. LOL! Finally had another use for strike out.)
Was Kampa from the Netherlands prior to being employed by LDPCSD in 1994?
Could there be a family/friend relationship or business connection going back to the Netherlands regarding the “slumbering 1995 proposed subdivision” Kampa has actively concealed from the public?
What about any of the other proposed large developments back then – are they to be brought back to life with this new KAMPA POU MAP SCAM?
I DO NOT KNOW
BUT HAVE BEEN STUDYING AND TRYING TO FIGURE THIS OUT FOR YEARS BECAUSE IT SURE APPEARS AS THOUGH SERIOUS FELONIES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED……but why?
WHAT AM I MISSING?
FAR MORE SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF LAW HAVE BEEN COMMITTED WITH COMPLEX DAMAGES TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION SYSTEM, YET EVERY DAY REGULAR CITIZENS CONVICTED OF FAR LESS SERIOUS TRANSGRESSIONS ARE SENT TO JAIL AND PRISON BECAUSE THEY INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED SOME LAW.
Please take some time to view the below documentary which explains why it was considered appropriate for many homeless individuals in the Netherlands to form “gangs” and forcibly break into homes and buildings belonging to others claiming them as their own – even to the point of armed resistance against the police.
AND THE NETHERLANDS COURT CAVED INTO THE SQUATTERS!
How did such a situation play out here in America with its distinction between private vs public property ownership and the specific protections afforded the former?
Why such apparent apathy for the continuing corruption of our local public agency and victimization of MR WECs by special interests clearly being served by a public official who refuses to tell the truth?
I must say the video and information accompanying it was rather surprising but it might possibly shed some light on Kampa’s personal philosophy and how he apparently believes his perspective and business goals should overrule STATE WATER BOARD regulations and general law? Evidently he believed it 20 years ago as he does today. Maybe other significant players in this nightmare performance of public betrayal are of a similar background, belief and perspective?
Maybe there has been a “KRACKEN GANG” regarding water operations in Lake Don Pedro even before the LDPCSD was formed so they consider it theirs to be used as they wish and the law be damned?
Notice a similarity with KAMPA’s apparent ideology that the SUBDIVISION’S ENTITLED WATER belongs to everyone and should be taken through any means possible?
Shades of the in your face BERKLEY FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT IN THE 1960’s?
WHICH HAS NOW ALSO APPARENTLY BEEN REPLACED WITH THE FASCIST INTOLERANCE OF THE ANTI-AMERICAN FAR LEFT!
What has happened to this country?
Why do so many people come to the UNITED STATES
claiming to seek OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS
then IMMEDIATELY BEGIN WORKING TO
CHANGE OUR AMERICAN SYSTEM INTO
A FORM OF THE GOVERNMENT THEY LEFT?
I was aware of some facts about the Netherlands such as the many political factions governing their geographically separate entities, the far left and liberal perspectives on drugs and prostitution (not being judgemental), but really not much else except for what I occasionally hear on the national news.
My comments are certainly not intended to be insulting, judgemental, or dismissive of another recognized government, way of life, culture, perspective, etc. The Netherlands appears to be a very beautiful area with a rich and interesting history, however, it is not my home. Yes! diversity is good but how the citizens of the Netherlands want to run their home is their business and if it works for them – fantastic. I am concerned with my home country, not the Netherlands, and US LAW should be respected and enforced regardless of what PRIVATE THIRD PARTY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS PETE KAMPA MIGHT POSSIBLY BELIEVE SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES.
I believe my financial investment in, and hard work for, my Lake Don Pedro Subdivision property has been severely devalued due to the failure of: the Lake Don Pedro Owners Association (LDPOA); LAFCO and Planning Departments of both Tuolumne County and Mariposa County; and now even the SWRCB to protect the subdivision’s entitled water under WL11395 which is the most valuable selling point for any LDPOA property served water by the LDPCSD in these drought prone foothills. Worse yet, property values will continue to decline so long as the special interests of land developers owning LAFCO annexed parcels (requiring GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT) continues to misdirect our CSD operations to the further financial detriment of mandatory customers who are forced to subsidize such development.
PUBLIC OFFICIALS WHO INTENTIONALLY VIOLATE LAW AND USE PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRIVATE SPECIAL INTEREST PROFIT SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE SAME DEGREE AS THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF, AND PARTICIPATION IN, SUCH BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC TRUST.
Sounds familiar…..
Oh yeah,
DRAIN THE SWAMP!
I’ve had it with this foolishness and outrageously corrupt public agency management.
LAKE DON PEDRO CSD is only a microcosm of the same type of garbage in Washington D.C. and Sacramento, heck, probably every where to one degree or another. Frankly I’m glad OUR PRESIDENT voices his preferences for candidates running for office – saves me the time of reading all the other “sounds too good to be true junk” which also provides more time to focus on draining our own local swamp.
President Trump is taking common sense, long overdue, hard stands on difficult issues that have detrimentally affected THIS NATION AND ALL HER CITIZENS for a very long time – and if he prefers to work with a particular individual – that is where my vote will go if I have the option! More on this later-
lakedonpedro.org FILE PHOTO: GENERAL MANAGER/BOARD TREASURER PETE KAMPA
Once again Peter Kampa and his “yes nodding bobble headed board of defectors”-
(They will likely be dubbed such childish titles until at least three of them can collectively GROW A SPINE AND STAND UP TO PETE KAMPA AND HIS ARROGANT SPECIAL INTEREST ACTIVITIES regarding the many LAFCO ANNEXATIONS he facilitated between 1994-1997 then returned in 2014 to supply the GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION (“Alternate source water”) NECESSARY FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENTS! Totally their decision whether to remain the “ZEROS” they have apparently been up to now or to admit they are human, made mistakes supporting Kampa’s agenda, and be the “HEROES” who ultimately STOOD UP TO KAMPA’s special interest CSD management.)
-are planning to violate District policy (Resolution 2013-4 – no further outside WL 11395 POU water service); the MID Place of Use for Merced River Water per Water License 11395; and the promise that the new GROUNDWATER WELL PRODUCTION DEVELOPED WITH PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES FOR EMERGENCY WATER DURING DROUGHT CONDITIONS WILL NOT BE USED TO EXPAND SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION SERVICES FOR LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE POU OF THE WATER LICENSE.
Another Pete Kampa/Board highly suspicious interpretation?
LIES, FABRICATED DOCUMENTS
and DECEIT?
All just compliments of
Good old “Sneaky Pete”.
*** SEPTEMBER 19th, 2018 UPDATE: ***
Yup, I was informed this morning (through a “surprise” director email) that the board indeed approved bringing the McDonough four parcels back into the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM.
A PROGRAM created and maintained with local public funds and resources (and state and federal grants) to provide a special benefit water service to private land developers holding LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES which are outside the Place of Use for Merced River water per water license 11395.
Perfect example of why attending meetings and making logical arguments is senseless and unhealthy because
Kampa and his “yes board” are determined to expand this
SUBSIDIZEDGROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM
for those LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUR DISTRICT
HAS NO LEGAL DUTY OR MORAL OBLIGATION
TO PROVIDE WATER SERVICE.
(Rather than sensibly saving that EMERGENCY DROUGHT WATER
for the next drought emergency.)
Kampa & Board are clearly unconcerned with the foreseeable detriment to the legal MR WECs of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision.
So,what should MR WECs expect in the future? Probably just what Kampa has already proposed: continued forced funding of further expensive groundwater wells to supply this “alternate source of water” for even more OUTSIDE SUBDIVISION PLACE OF USE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS for owners who refuse to obtain their own groundwater wells due to the expense.
*** END OF UPDATE ***
Kampa refers to district boundaries – which in this case, are actually the boundaries established when this property was annexed into the district by LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission). IT is outside the Place of Use (POU) subdivision under the water licensee. If this is the same Mc Donough property I believe it is, the owners unsuccessfully attempted to get out of the district for decades and stop paying STANDBY FEES as they had their own private groundwater well as was intended for properties outside the subdivision POU.
RECALL ALSO THAT OUTSIDE WATER LICENSE EXPANSIONISTS changed the term STANDBY to “availability” for these outside POU water services – as they DID NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO WATER SERVICE AS SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS!
As Kampa’s carefully worded resolution acknowledges, the owners were finally successful in “getting out of the LDPCSD” after many years of trying to do so. Yet true to Kampa, that’s not the whole story.
I recall discussions of our district’s SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM WATER SERVICES FOR LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES not being a continuing “IN AND OUT” SORT OF SITUATION as GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION was PRIMARILY A LEGAL REMEDY for the KNOWN WATER SERVICE VIOLATIONS OUTSIDE THE LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION. (Formerly Sierra Highlands Water Company subdivision per the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION.
NOTE: EVERY SINGLE PROPERTY IN THE LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION IS ENTITLED TO MERCED RIVER WATER SERVICE AT ANY TIME UPON DEMAND!
That is why the STANDBY TERM WAS INSTITUTED – water would be on STANDBY just waiting for the subdivision property owner to request water service.
Not only should that water be protected for the MR WECs (Merced River Water Entitled Customers) of the subdivision who have PAID STANDBY FEES ON THEIR PROPERTY TAXES EVER SINCE THEY PURCHASED THEIR LAKE DON PEDRO PROPERTY, but placing those increased costs for that SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUND WATER SUBSTITUTION on those same entitled property owners is simply unethical and wrong (I believe also illegal) aka PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES FOR PRIVATE SPECIAL INTEREST LAND DEVELOPMENT BENEFIT where our district has NO LEGAL DUTY or MORAL OBLIGATION to provide such service.
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING PROPERTY VALUES IN THE LAKE DON PEDRO RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION:
OUR SUBDIVISION HAD – AND IS HAVING, IT’S GREATEST SELLING POINT (quality Merced River water)redistributed through an expensive GROUNDWATER PROGRAM PAID FOR BY THE MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS THAT IT WAS SUPPOSEDLY CREATED TO SERVE DURING EMERGENCY DROUGHT CONDITIONS WHERE LAKE WATER MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE —LIKE WE ALMOST RECENTLY EXPERIENCED. (I say ALMOST because I still believe there is a good argument that PETER KAMPA and HIS BOARD completely misrepresented the facts to that situation as well.
Had our emergency intake equipment been properly maintained (rather than intentionally allowed to degrade as an excuse for nonuse) those millions of dollars in grant funds could have been spent where needed – UPGRADING INTAKE WITH THE McCLURE POINT DEEP WATER PROJECT WHEN THE LAKE WAS AT IT’S LOWEST ELEVATION IN HISTORY – THE PERFECT TIME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DECADES OLD PLAN TO SOLVE THE LAKE WATER SUPPLY FOR THE FUTURE DURING CYCLICAL DROUGHT!
Problem was, that new intake system would have only served properties entitled to that Merced River water in the Lake Don Pedro Subdivision – and that is NOT WHAT PETER KAMPA AND HIS BOARD HAVE BEEN FOCUSED ON SINCE 2014! (You know? When that unethical closed recruitment process orchestrated by Board Members guaranteed Kampa would have access to the over one million in district cash with which to leverage the state and federal grants required to develop the groundwater wells necessary to serve the thousands of acres of LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES KAMPA setup between 1994-1997 when first employed at the LDPCSD?)
The ONE BIG CHANCE TO FINALLY SECURE A SUSTAINABLE MERCED RIVER WATER INTAKE – EVEN DURING THE MOST SEVERE DROUGHT – WAS THROWN AWAY SO PETE KAMPA COULD SPEND A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS ON DRY AND NON PRODUCING WELLS in search of GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTED SERVICE for his LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES.
BACK TO CURRENT SUBJECT: PROVIDING MORE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FOR A LAFCO ANNEXATION OUTSIDE THE SUBDIVISION:
This owner was clearly advised the decision to leave this SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM FOR WATER SERVICE was a one-way trip (aka no “In Through The Out Door” – Led Zeppelin, 1979? lol) – and there would be no “in and out”, “will pay, won’t pay” continuing issue – it was to be a final decision regarding public funded services for private land development concerns in regards to that particular property <period>.
RE-ADMITTANCE BACK INTO THE DISTRICT FOR POSSIBLE AVAILABLE FUTURE WATER?
GOOD GRIEF!
Over 25 years it apparently took McDonough to finally detach from the LDPCSD and stop paying for potential water service that his properties should never have been offered in the first place. It was not a quick decision to leave, if the below LDPCSD minutes are referencing the same four parcels that Kampa is now attempting to bring back into his GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM. Were they not also initially (and wrongfully) stated to have been within the legal water license POU according to Kampa’s fake map which he presented to the State Water Board as a defense to known water license POU violations?
(NOTE: I am reasonably sure there are more references to these McDonough parcels in LDPCSD records but I have wasted enough of my Saturday researching this matter already and should be outside working. Besides I believe the point has already been made – the decision to leave KAMPA’s “potential GROUNDWATER SPECIAL BENEFIT SERVICE”was not made hastily as suggested in the agenda packet due to an individual’s health issues and attempt to save money.
Also….looks like Liz is bringing a suspiciously filled sock of something to the computer………YIKES! lol.)
Yet now the situation is portrayed as a cost saving issue for a woman who was in declining health?
Argumentum ad misericordiam, the sob story, (or the Galileo argument) is a fallacy (of logic) in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent’s feelings of pity or guilt. It is a specific kind of appeal to emotion, appeal to the misery of another.
“The jury must acquit these two young defendants as they are now orphans.”
(Defense attorney playing down the fact the two intended to murder their parents!) Argumentum ad misericordiam.
NOTE: I believe Director Emery Ross’s neighbor HUGH MARTIN also desperately wanted out of the district and was eventually able to do so – will this be another KAMPA INTERPRETATION OF A RIGHT TO SUBDIVISION WATER AND PUBLIC RESOURCES TO SERVE PRIVATE LAND DEVELOPMENT INTERESTS?
Will this land eventually be subdivided also – with even more GROUNDWATER SUBSIDIZED SERVICES?
That’s how these things work – first the FOOT IN THE DOOR (like a pushy door-to-door aggressive salesman) – obtain one connection, then later subdivide the land and demand more water connections! IT NEVER STOPS! WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT 2013-4 was designed to do which is why KAMPA twice attempted to abolish the resolution as he always intended to furnish the newly developed groundwater production to these LAFCO ANNEXATIONS – IT WAS NEVER ABOUT PROTECTING THE LEGAL CUSTOMERS FROM CYCLICAL DROUGHT!
WHY SELL MORE OF OUR EMERGENCY DROUGHT GROUNDWATER TO OUTSIDE POU PROPERTY OWNERS WHO WILL SIMPLY SUBDIVIDE AND SELL THOSE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTIES FOR MORE MONEY BECAUSE THEY NOW HAVE DISTRICT WATER AVAILABLE?
REMEMBER WHAT KAMPA AND THE BOARD SAID?
THE NEW GROUNDWATER WELLS WOULD NEVER BE USED TO EXPAND OUTSIDE POU PROPERTY WATER SERVICE. What do viewers think about such statements now?
Shake hands with Pete Kampa and you had better count your fingers later!
THE McDONOUGH PROPERTIES (and others) ARE OUTSIDE THE POU AND DO NOT HAVE DISTRICT SERVICE; should not be placed on an “availability list” nor later receive an EXPENSIVE GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PAID FOR BY THE LEGAL CUSTOMERS of the subdivision that the public was told was intended for emergency drought use!
TYPICAL KAMPAGANDA ALL THE WAY AROUND!
(End of my interpretation? Guess again.)
WHAT DID THE STATE WATER BOARD REPORT IN SEPTEMBER OF 2017?
That 18 month STATE WATER BOARD INVESTIGATION (RESULTING IN A NOTICE OF VIOLATION) revealed there were MORE LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES RECEIVING MERCED RIVER WATERTHAN HAD BEEN REPORTED IN THE MANDATORY MONTHLY COMPLIANCE REPORTS TO THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT SINCE December 2000!
OUR DISTRICT DOES NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN AS A RESULT OF THE ONGOING PAST VIOLATIONS THAT THE STATE WATER BOARD RECENTLY DISCOVERED!
HOW WILL THE STATE RECEIVE (and interpret) PETE KAMPA’S PATHETIC ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL HIS DISHONESTY WITH A FAKE POU MAP SLIPPED IN AS A DEFENSE?
A FAKE POU MAP ON FILE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES?
WHAT ABOUT THE APPARENT ATTEMPTED CLOSURE OF THAT INVESTIGATION DUE TO KAMPA SUBMITTING OTHER FALSE INFORMATION?
ALL OF THIS DECEITFUL GARBAGE BASED ON PETE KAMPA “INTERPRETING ANOTHER PERSON’S INTENT”?
Who knows? There could be even more properties receiving Merced River water that the SWRCB missed because of surreptitious underground water lines traveling out much further from the subdivision than originally anticipated? Consider our massive treated and raw water losses for decades with that information withheld by Pete Kampa and his board. I do not believe for a nanosecond all that water is simply “lost”. WHAT A SCAM!
And now, on top of all this, KAMPA AND HIS BOARD plan to increase this OUTSIDE POU WATER SERVICE even more through another costly “KAMPA INTERPRETATION” WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT SORT OF TROUBLE THE LDPCSD IS ALREADY IN DUE TO KAMPA AND HIS BOARD’S PREVIOUS DECEITFUL ACTIONS?
THIS IS ABSOLUTE BULL SHIT!
And for what purpose you might ask?
(Hummm, subsidized water in a drought prone rural area with thousands of acres of LAFCO annexed land Kampa set up twenty years ago……..like that “slumbering 900 acre subdivision” kept a secret from the public for 20 years?)
Speaking of KAMPA INTERPRETATION – for years I pleaded with our “DO-NOTHING BOARD” of directors to simply contact the Merced Irrigation District and the State Water Resources Control Board and request an official map of the water license Place of Use for Lake Don Pedro – but they refused to do even that – preferring to trust their GM Pete Kampa. (Despite his infamous LDPCSD historical record – or because of it?)
Now that the truth is VERY SLOWLY coming out as to the duplicitous activities by Kampa and his “YES BOARD” regarding LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES and ATTEMPTING TO PROVIDE MORE SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTED WATER SERVICE – what exactly is the
ENTIRE BASIS
for their continuing lies, deceit and falsification of a government map touted to be the “FINAL ANSWER to the OUTSIDE MIDPOU CONTROVERSY ONCE AND ALL FOR THE LDPCSD UNDER WATER LICENSE 11395?
Check out the below statement from Kampa’s December 28th, 2017 response to the STATE WATER BOARD REQUEST FOR HIS BOGUS, FABRICATED SPECIAL INTEREST MAPS (overlays):
PETE KAMPA:
“The District can provide the map overlays requested in item (1) above, using the District’s interpretation of the intent of the parcels to be included in the POU boundary by the POU drafter.”
What was that again?
Using the “district’s interpretation” (aka Pete Kampa’s)
0f the intent of the POU DRAFTER?
GOOD GRIEF!
KAMPA HAS ABSOLUTELY NO SHAME WHAT-SO-EVER!
PETE KAMPA IGNORES THE FACTUAL POU OF THE WATER LICENSE AND REPLACES IT WITH HIS “interpretation” of what some drafter originally meant to legally convey in an official government document decades ago?
Essentially “interpreting the intent” of another individual (professional engineer) who had already performed their work in order to change a POU map that would be more conducive to Pete Kampa’s secret land development agenda he’d been working on for over twenty years?
Kampa also told the public a “fire hydrant was not a fire hydrant first, but rather a purge relief valve first , and “fire hydrant” second.
Kampa interpreted a prior board decision from years ago as as being inadequate for their decision (which held despite challenge before Kampa) in order to greatly increase district liability by reestablishing post retirement medical benefits.
Kampa in the 1990s interpreted LAFCO as having the authority to overrule the STATE WATER BOARD and permit Merced River water service to any LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT!
Kampa interpreted the POU to include whatever he needed it to include!
I have work to do. There are many examples of PETE KAMPA’s ability to “interpret” things differently than originally – and clearly intended and ratified by policy, regulations, and the law.
Pete Kampa does not tell the truth and has been cheating the MR WECs of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision since 1994 with the assistance of those “special interest traitors living within the subdivision” who have also pushed for a subsidized special benefit GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTED WATER SERVICE for LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE POU OF THE WATER LICENSE – for their “friends”?
OH YEAH….PLEASE NOTICE ONE OF THE REQUESTING PARTIES HERE: local real estate interests which have greatly assisted in creating this OUTSIDE POU NIGHTMARE – naturally they advocate all subdivision property owners pay for this expensive GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM outside the residential subdivision – THEY MAKE MORE MONEY ON THE SALE OF MORE OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE LAFCO LAND THAT HAS DISTRICT WATER SERVICE!
PUBLIC MONEY AND RESOURCES FOR SPECIAL INTEREST PRIVATE PROFIT?
Pure and simple.
Well, I must get back to my own work – digging in this rock geology is far more enjoyable than thinking about deceitful characters like Pete Kampa and his Board Defectors who have clearly demonstrated their lack of concern for the truth or in doing what’s right for the MR WECsof the Lake Don Pedro subdivision.
Sooner or later the depths of their duplicity and dishonesty will be revealed for all to see and understand.
My best to you and yours, Lew
PS: Finally received (this morning) the below response to my submitted agenda item request on July 27, 2018 ….. yup, on the Friday immediately before the September Monday meeting – LOL
Here’s that old agenda item request followed by today’s Sep 14 2018 response:
I contacted the LDPCSD office by telephone on Tuesday, July 17, 2018 inquiring about the cost of an audio copy of yesterday’s monthly board meeting. I spoke with Anne who advised you were unsure what the cost would be but would advise me when determined. Considering our audio recordings are now digital (you have provided meeting copies to me in the past) seems the cost should not be that great. Regardless, please notify as soon as possible and I will provide payment. I did not attend yesterday’s meeting but am extremely interested in a couple of particular aspects.
Regarding the digital recordings of our public meetings,
I request that the LDPCSD (like so many other public agencies and organizations already do) post our digital recordings of meetings on the LDPCSD website for customers to review and appreciate on their own schedule just like the digital monthly meeting agenda packets. No doubt there are also many customers who would rather listen to the entire meeting while doing something else at home rather than having to sit and read snippets of carefully prepared management censored material.
The thousands of MR WECs (Merced River Water Entitled Customers) of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision (both residential and out of area owners all over the world) should not be required to physically attend inconvenient meetings held in the middle of nowhere in Lake Don Pedro every third Monday of each month at 1300hrs just to stay adequately informed about a public agency of which they are mandatory customers due to property ownership in the subdivision. No customer should be required to voluntarily perform countless hours of work every month just to present these meetings on a private website (lakedonpedro.org) when the District has the means to provide such service on its own website. (Such a service would also guarantee those customers could listen to a meeting without “personal opinions being interjected between portions of recorded meetings. WIN-WIN Lol!)
MR WECs are stakeholders with a direct financial interest tied to LDPCSD operations due to the obvious influence water availability has on their subdivision property values in a drought prone region. They are not speculators looking to turn an easy buck with someone else’s water. They are already greatly invested in their land, and water. Current management policies and direction, with obvious director support and/or acquiencese, seems to forget that every single CPUC approved lot in the LDP subdivision has the unequivocal right to water service upon demand at anytime in the future. Will that water be available for those who are entitled and paid for it since their subdivision property ownership? I believe it is long overdue that our LDPCSD website is upgraded to include current and pertinent factual information as to how this district has been managed and directed since October 2014. The mandatory MR WECs of the subdivision who must financially support this special district deserve no less.
Please have this request placed on next month’s agenda for consideration and advise when I can pay for, and pick up, the audio CD of yesterday’s meeting.
Thank you, Lew
????????
Friday, Sept 14, 2018:
Lew,
Pete wanted me to contact you and let you know it is not necessary to place this as an agenda item. It does not need to be a board decision. He is in favor of having the recorded board meetings on our website and wants to move forward in doing so. He appreciates your idea. He is considering all options of how best to have the large files uploaded. He thanks you for bringing this to our attention.
LEW HERE: OH YES, PETE KAMPA AND HIS BOARD OF DEFECTORS HAVE ALWAYS VOICED SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY,
but
NOTICE WHAT THEY HAVE ACTUALLY DONE SINCE 2014?
Lol
But then again, did you know Pete Kampa has received an award for government transparency?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
(old school lol)
Yup, the CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION (CSDA) must be very proud of their twenty year board director Pete Kampa.
Or perhaps it is just a matter of interpretation?
You know, what they believe to be most important, yeah?
later
OH YEAH….almost forgot….how can the Board of Directors consider selecting a new engineering consultant when at least one of them has been provided a FAKE POU MAP created by GM/Treasurer Pete Kampa which is under current investigation and scrutiny by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)?
Seems similar to the “let’s add another outside POU LAFCo Annexed property for expensive GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION WATER SERVICE” before hearing from the SWRCB regarding existing and NEW violations of water license 11395 service outside the POU recently discovered.
Before jumping off into potential further difficulties, based on Pete Kampa/Board interpretations of fact, would it not be prudent to wait for the SWRCB to contact the LDPCSD with whatever determination/judgement is made at that time?
HOW CAN ANYTHING BE DECIDED UNTIL THIS DISTRICT IS MADE AWARE OF THE LEGAL PLACE OF USE?
Why does it seem the cart is always placed before the horse in Lake Don Pedro?
Yet another “after thought”
DISTRICT HAD A 24% TREATED WATER LOSS FOR LAST MONTH!
(who would accept this on their own property? Almost a quarter out of every dollar?)
AND NOW – THE SATURDAY MORNING ADDITION OF “OH YEAH almost forgot”…….
RE: KAMPA/BOARD PROPOSAL TO ADD ANOTHER OUTSIDE POU PROPERTY FOR EXPENSIVE SUBSIDIZED GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION……. (A property whose owner tried for decades to get out of the district and paying an “availability fee” but whose owner now recognizes there is money to be made with a property that has a public funded water source. What happened to wanting “nothing to do” with the LDPCSD? Oh. Money to be made.)
THIS PROPERTY IS OUTSIDE THE MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED SUBDIVISION, and therefore has no CC&Rs (Covenants, Codes and Restrictions) attached to the propertylike every single Lake Don Pedro Owners Association property does. As any subdivision property owner knows, CC&Rs are far more restrictive on how a property owner may develop their subdivision land when compared to the much less restrictive properties which are only subject to county regulations.
This is an important variable when considering the ultimate future water demand of the subdivision since further subdividing (splitting of lots) in the existing LDP subdivision is generally prohibited along with other activities depending upon which Unit of the subdivision the property is located. Also of extreme importance is the fact subdivision properties (unless otherwise designated as commercial, natural park, tank site, etc.) are intended for residential purposes only. RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES ONLY – not developing a catfish farm, commercial cattle ranching business, truck/car wash, water slide, etc. with the treated (chlorinated) water clearly intended for human consumption in a residential subdivision environment.
The district should be dedicated to the proposition of reducing the amount of properties that receive such an expensive publicly subsidized special benefit GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION WATER SERVICE, not increasing the number of “favored recipients”. Every added property to that MANDATORY COMPLIANCE LIST SENT TO THE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT EACH MONTH increases costs for that special benefit that are passed on to the innocent victim MR WECs of the LDP subdivision who have always been entitled to water service.
Pete Kampa’s proposal to add another outside POU property to the GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM for LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES violates both Resolution 2013-4 and the promises by Kampa and his board that the new groundwater wells developed with public funds WOULD NOT BE USED TO INCREASE THAT GROUNDWATER DEMAND – which is exactly what passage of this special interest proposed resolution will do.
And finally, the most important issue –
the cyclical nature of drought. The severe drought which we all recently experienced will likely return again at some point and what we do now will either better prepare us for the next one, or as Kampa (and his board?) propose now, make water availability even worse.
WHY WOULD ANYONE SELL OUR LIMITED EMERGENCY DROUGHT WATER SUPPLY – DEVELOPED WITH PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES PRIMARILY FROM THE SUBDIVISION CUSTOMERS – TO PROPERTY OWNERS OUTSIDE THE LEGAL PLACE OF USE FOR MERCED RIVER WATER (aka, the LEGAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION) WHICH OUR DISTRICT HAS NO LEGAL DUTY OR MORAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE WATER SERVICE IN THE FIRST PLACE?
Why provide such expensive groundwater to properties NOT REGULATED by CC&Rs as subdivision properties have been since created in the late 1960s?
Why should private real estate and land development speculators be permitted to use public resources for personal and/or commercial monetary gain?
LDPCSD experience has clearly demonstrated once such special benefit water service has been provided OUTSIDE THE POU, many others will demand the same special service. Why should some receive such and others not? This foolishness must stop somewhere. I now understand why some other local real estate owners and land development companies were so frustrated and angry with being denied groundwater substitution for their proposed developments when other such developments could be secretly approved and effectively concealed from the public for over 20 years until Pete Kampa was returned to provide the required government grant money to develop the necessary “ALTERNATE SOURCE WATER” with expensive groundwater wells. Sneaky and unethical.
This continuing “KAMPAGANDA SPEAK” in concert with his duplicitous activities begs the big question:
how will this continuing, expensive, and futile cycle of further groundwater substitution and water well development due to expansion of OUTSIDE POU district water service to other LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES; (in our historically drought prone foothills no less) EVER STOP when the Board of Directors refuse to stand up for the thousands of property owners within the LDP subdivision (as they were elected/appointed to do) and simply say
NO MORE
to Pete Kampa’s obvious and determined special interest in providing expensive groundwater service for LAFCO annexations he set up 20 years ago – all the while forcing the MR WECs of the subdivision (mandatory customers of the LDPCSD naturally) to pay for such treachery, deceit, and devaluation of their subdivision property investment? (The advantageous position of being ENTITLED TO QUALITY WATER SERVICE is lost when surrounding OUTSIDE PLACE OF USE lands without CC&Rs are included.
Why be part of a subdivision with CC&Rs, violation committees, another Board of Directors, annual assessments, etc. when “open FREE land” devoid of such regulations is available with the same water service at the same cost?)
Speaking of “same water”, please also realize that the thousands of subdivision property owners who are entitled to the quality MERCED RIVER WATER flowing from Yosemite National Park are now forced to consume water that must be treated for contaminants contained in groundwater such as arsenic! Consider the additional groundwater treatment, monitoring equipment, state reporting, etc. which all adds to the cost of water service to the subdivision owner who is entitled to Merced River water by virtue of purchasing their Lake Don Pedro property!
What is the purpose of a Community Services District (CSD) – when not hijacked by a carpet-bagging exploiter like Pete Kampa who (with his board’s’ assistance) turned a surface water treatment plant into a groundwater substitution facility for LAFRCO annexed properties?
What is a CSD? CSDs were designed and intended to:
Provide a limited service to a defined geographical area. (This aspect of a CSD was violated when Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs) ANNEXE OTHER PROPERTIES INTO A DESIGNATED WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARY. The “limited service” is also expanded beyond intent when “GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION” PREVIOUSLY USED AS A LEGAL REMEDYFOR WATER LICENSE VIOLATIONS IS TRANSFORMED INTO A METHOD TO INTENTIONALLY CIRCUMVENT WATER LICENSE RESTRICTIONS REGARDING SERVICE OUTSIDE THE LICENSE PLACE OF USE);
A limited service to a particular group of people – as in a defined subdivision of residents. (Again, expanding a special benefit groundwater service INCREASES THE POPULATION OF THAT PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED KNOWN GROUP and violates the “particular group” because it is always subject to change and increase.)
The service is provided to customers for only the costs necessary in providing that “limited service”. (Again, another primary element of properly functioning CSD is destroyed when the intended beneficiaries are paying far more for their water service than is necessary due to the SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SERVICE TO LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE WATER LICENSE PLACE OF USE!)
Calculating the water demand for a defined subdivision with only a certain number of properties that can only develop in a particular way due to CC&Rs and their residential use requirements is a far cry from open large parcels of land annexed into the CSD by LAFCO where CC&Rs do not exist and the ultimate use of the property is unknown (potential further subdivisions, water parks, cattle ranching, etc.) and a realistic future water demand cannot be accurately determined.
The Lake Don Pedro Community Services District is an icon for CSD corruption and a good example as to why such organizations should likely be abolished in California as discussed by the Little Hoover Commission last year. Seriously, our subdivision is only half developed; absentee property owners are not permitted to vote in district elections despite the fact they have paid a STANDBY FEE on their property taxes since subdivision property purchase,
Whereas,
LAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTY OWNERS (often real estate-land developer speculative interests and not “true intended resident homeowners”) who often do not receive District water service, pay nothing to the district in rates or fees can never-the-less vote in, and determine, which directors will represent the thousands of MR WECS of the LDP subdivision (the 99% of CSD customers!).
FOLKS THIS IS A MAJOR CONTINUING SCAM THAT MUST STOP!
Frankly I am still shocked such outrageous activity has been permitted to continue for so many years but a close look at the history and motivations of some of the local players does reveal much. Being “hoodwinked” by exploiters like Pete Kampa is one thing but systematic betrayal by local residents working with him is another.
Speaking of SCAMS…..
the LDPCSD is still waiting for the STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD decision regarding the September 28th, 2018 NOTICE OF VIOLATION – should such arrogant attempts to further expand the OUTSIDE POU GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM take place until that decision is announced?
What Pete Kampa has done to this CSD (with local special interest assistance) is a good example of why California citizens pay far more for less with their tax dollars. Shame, shame, shame.
OK, got to get back to work. Just figured the above was important enough to repeat, yes the above
IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO REPEAT!
HERE ARE SOME THOUGHTS WES BARTON RECENTLY DISTRIBUTED:
(lakedonpedro.org file photo of WES BARTON)
Sorry, for missing my first thought on the return of the CSD:
RED HERRINGS !
In this case pages and pages and pages of repeated Paperwork !
DID PETE CHANGE ONE PARAGRAPH FROM THE TIME BEFORE ?
Question: Is Wes paranoid, need brain and eye surgery, OR JUST OBSERVANT !
~~~
Good to see the “gang” is back and in splendid form! Pete may have fine tuned his “capacity” !
I’m sure every thing I will note, this Board has already seen:
1) no President report
2) no GM report
3) no document of no August minutes/ meetings
Approval and consent:
5a) First, I don’t question that the attorney may have commented as Pete declares; but do you
Wonder what his full letter said concerning the “yo-yo” activity of CSD concerning this request?
I believe “Martin” (ask Emory) did something similar but not to ask to be forgiven (yet?). I assume
If the other 1700 non-improved properties ask for their $60 back it is ok and if they finally sell they
Can repay? (I understand not apple to apples, but close enough to show this Board’s disregard for
Anything consistent and honoring the true members, isn’t necessary.) If I’m not mistaken, the 2013
Decision said something about “no forgiveness” if they pulled out of the CSD (regardless how they got-in).
Come-on, Pete, can’t say they made you do it. This is just a way to build your “questionable value” at the
Expense of the community. Even Danny, 2 x, has agreed if you are out, you are out. I haven’t tried to study
The map to see if this is an example of the first, second, third, fourth, etc original map BUT IT DOESN’T
MATTER, until the current/new seller/buyer sues. Sales folks engineer firm suppose to try to serve their
Clients; CSD is to serve their members. To break the established rules, visit near cronyism, seldom serves
Anyone, especially CSD members.
5b) To near quote our last GM, John’s good for he is cheap and I can control. The next CPA is more expensive
And I don’t think I can control. John is currently under a complaint review by CA Licensing unless something
Has changed since July 2018. Of all of the CPA alternatives, John certainly is the least staffed and I would
Think challenging his longevity is fair. At best one year at a time is less risk.
5c) Given all the money CSD has paid out to Kennedy-Jenks and their activity in 5d) to come, too; whether
This engineer firm is the best or sent planning to deposit their bid in the “junk file”, I don’t know ! What I
Do know is that the GM at Groveland CSD recommends this engineer. Whooops that’s old Pete again.
Share those resources, Pete, build your game plan. “Jerry” is leaving, maybe you can drive his blue Plymouth.
Finally, got the waste (shrink) reports. 2 mos at 25% +/-. As Randy says, the intake shrink is still flowing
Because PG & E won’t move the pole. Wonder how much that leak alone would up the intake waste
CSD refuses to accept as real. Water is cheap! I wonder if CSD paid the old PG & E $16k complaint from a year
Or so ago, PG & E might bring the pole down? At least, with continuing running the water down the road,
BUT WHERE IS THE PUNISHMENT FOR AN INTENTIONAL WRONGDOER?
No wonder State Water Board investigations and such don’t seem to bother or concern Pete Kampa much – he is already personally familiar with the investigative processes involved and the likely outcomes that will result.
This may be especially true in the Lake Don Pedro CSD POU KAMPA MAP SCAM CASE as it certainly appears Kampa already had “operatives” working for his interests within particular SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board) divisions. Yes, that is a pretty bold statement but when all the facts are finally made public I believe the far majority of viewers will wholeheartedly agree with the statement – if not all.
Actually, I have withheld some, what I consider to be very important information, regarding the “motives of others” in this matter due to the hope of eventually contacting an investigator interested in the truth, but if that does not materialize I’ll still share it with you viewers like I have in the past – considering those charged with investigating and enforcing the law in such matters apparently do not seem the least bit interested. (Of course it is entirely possible that “they” are just reluctant to communicate ANYTHING with a FRUSTRATED BIG MOUTH BLOGGER! lol)
But seriously though, how many times must a citizen request contact with a LEGITIMATE STATE INVESTIGATOR or wait for some human acknowledgement and cooperation (rather than mere computer generated “thank you auto-responses”) or some affirmative corrective action by the “POWERS THAT BE” before throwing hands up in complete disgust and frustration and giving up just as the intentional wrongdoers desire?
It’s already been 2-1/2 years since the original complaint. TWO AND A HALF YEARS OF WASTED PUBLIC RESOURCES REGARDING A MATTER THAT COULD BE CLEARED UP IN ONLY MINUTES WITH THE FACTUAL TRUTHS ALREADY DOCUMENTED IN THE SEPTEMBER 28TH, 2017 STATE WATER BOARD NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO THE LDPCSD AND GM PETE KAMPA! Unbelievable.
Heck, even if the LDPCSD were to pick up a fine (like the one below from another one of Kampa’s “remote managed CSDs”) Kampa isn’t the one who ends up paying for that “slap on the wrist” anyway. Care to take a wild guess at who IS ACTUALLY FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE for such Kampa failures?
Please also realize there is a BIG DIFFERENCE between failing to meet routine state paperwork deadlines and the intentional violation of WL11395 POU restrictions on Merced River water use for over two decades. And what was the purpose of such water license violations and the provision of an extremely expensiveGROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM to property owners our district has no moral obligation or legal duty to provide water?
So private third party land developers with outside WL113395 POULAFCO ANNEXED PROPERTIES (with whom Kampa worked with over 20 years ago) would have a subsidized water service for greater profits. (ie, as in a “slumbering 900 acre subdivision” Kampa had supposedly annexed in 1995 yet that annexation was essentially concealed from the public for over 20 years until shortly before Kampa’s unethical board of director’s closed GM recruitment process and appointment in 2014.)
Yup a VERY BIG DIFFERENCE from accidentally falling behind in required state paperwork.
ACTUAL INTENT OF THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
THATSHOULD BETHE FOCUS.
(NOTE: The above blank form is what was included in the Hornbrook online file.)
FILE PHOTO: LDPCSD GENERAL MANAGER/TREASURER PETE KAMPA
aka “BARGE KAPTIAN” KAMPA?
Yup, Lake Don Pedro Community Services District (LDPCSD) General Manager/Board Treasurer Pete Kampa has fabricated a lot since his unethical return and appointment as the “VOICE OF THE DISTRICT” in October 2014.
Seriously, who can claim to have single-handedly changed a decades old PLACE OF USE restriction for MERCED RIVER WATER per water license 11395?
And with a “board approved $35,000 DIGITAL MAPPING PROJECT” no less?
Or like a magician could conceal a 900 acre approved residential subdivision right across the street from the LDPCSD Admin Office from the public and board directors for over twenty years?
(No doubt with great assistance from entrenched pro-Kampa officials in various government positions who went along with this “Deep State like” transition from a legitimate public business into a focused special interest reconfiguration of our SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT to a GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION FACILITYfor private land developers outside the Place of Use – ALL WITH PUBLIC FUNDS AND RESOURCES NATURALLY!)
No sense in speculating on the many possibilities involving who had a motive/prior knowledge and/or provided assistance in the “fabrication” of important official historical LDPCSD records or in the actual destruction of legitimate records along with an entire administrative office building.
Thank heavens for insurance right? Don’t fool yourself – all part of the same scam that still costs the innocent and LEGAL rate paying customers. Fallacious greedy logic – availability and use of insurance coverage for the victims of crime has been a rationalized excuse for criminal activity since the beginning….you know, the crooks tell themselves: “victims will get their value back eventually and be made whole with insurance coverage so why not take what I need for my purposes now?”
Who else could finagle sufficient public grants to develop groundwater wells for suspicious LAFCO annexed properties KAMPA assisted in setting up over 20 years ago when aware an extremely expensive groundwater substitution program would be required to actually develop the land eventually?
(Planting the seeds of water use corruption over twenty years ago only to return to water and harvest his crop?)
Seriously, think about it…..groundwater well production was the ONLY REALISTIC LEGAL REMEDY AVAILABLE FOR THESE PAST INTENTIONAL VIOLATIONs (and circumvention) OF THE WATER LICENSE – rather like insurance yeah? And who pays for maintaining that “water service insurance with increasing monthly premiums”?
What a lucky coincidence huh? I mean the STATE WATER BOARDdiscovering there were more unreported Outside POU properties also requiring groundwater substitution when the groundwater wells had already been developed?
You really believe that?
Perhaps you might be interested in purchasing a partially reconfigured KAMPA BARGE at a bargain price?
Yes indeed, way too many KAMPAGANDA “fabrications” to address now, let’s get back to the “local boat fabricator, F&S Houseboats located in Snelling”, per Monday’s LDPCSD agenda packet. (below)
Feel like a fish with a hook in its mouth? Slowly being reeled into a net?
Yes, of course I realize PETE KAMPA may have just confused the name Chico with Snelling.
Understandable?
They both have an “i” in them, as in
“I”
DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING KAMPA
BASED ON HIS PAST, AND CONTINUING, DECEIT.
Besides, he confuses Outside POU and Inside POU issues all the time and there appears to be a never ending supply of misinformation and confusion with ANYTHING involving the LDPCSD, KAMPA, Post Retirement Medical Benefits, grant funding, water loss, illegal DIVERSIONS OF MERCED RIVER WATER,subsidized special benefitgroundwater substitution programs, etc,.
Where is anysemblance of ACCOUNTABILITY for such intentional acts against the interests of <MR WECs> of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision which the LDPCSD was supposedly created and intended to serve?
Boo boos happen all the time right? Like incorrect information being posted last March/April on the STATE WATER BOARD website regarding water right complaints filed in 2016 which although resulted in confirmed violations were ultimately listed under the wrong county location for public review?
(Was this an attempt to prevent some sort of routine computer software cross check for entities with state violations still receiving public grants or other legitimate support? I have no idea but do not believe for a nanosecond such were simple mistakes.)
Perhaps STATE EMPLOYEES sympathetic to Kampa’s personal/business agenda here in Lake Don Pedro were also infected with the “confusion virus” and just happened to post the violation location as Stanislaus instead of Tuolumne? And Sutter County instead of Mariposa?
(Or was it Stanislaus instead of Mariposa and Sutter instead of Tuolumne? Does it matter?)
Must check my maps….didn’t realize the Merced River ran through Sutter County.
NOPE – NOT OUR MERCED RIVER WATER PER WL11395 UP IN SUTTER COUNTY!
Just because that STATE WATER BOARD INVESTIGATION took 18 months (an excellent, detailed, and appreciated report incidentally – cleared up decades of false information provided to the public by these special interests of real estate and land development looking for increased profit margins) and cost taxpayers who knows how much (while trying to untangle a CSD nightmare of decades of wrongful behavior, fraud, misappropriation of public resources, etc.) – that doesn’t mean accidents could not still occur, right?
Agreed, but not finding a local listing for F&S HOUSEBOATS in Snelling I decided to contact the company that was listed on the internet in Chico, CA. If not actually F&S HOUSEBOATS – they should know their business name is being used here, if the same company and Kampa just confused the location, fine, F&S HOUSEBOATS should still know what they might be getting into.)
Here’s that request for information:
sales@fshouseboats.com <sales@fshouseboats.com>;
Does F&S Houseboats have a Snelling CA branch also?
The Lake Don Pedro Community Services District agenda packet for the May 21, 2018 Monthly Board Meeting, indicates a meeting with “one highly recommended local boat fabricator located in Snelling” (approximately 20 miles away) occurred on May 17th, 2018 in regards to fabrication/renovation of an Emergency Barge used to pump water (in conjunction with a floating pump platform) when lake level drops below permanent water intake lines at Lake McClure. Twin Lakes Management Company (TLMC), of the Merced Irrigation District, holder of water license 11395 under which our district has pumped water for decades, recently rejected the project as being “too large and too complex of a project” and “too much of a liability for the boat yard” and “TLMC could in no way be responsible for the project”— despite work already completed over the last year. Also, after this discussion with an F&S Houseboat representative the possibility now exists that a substantial amount of public funds already spent on barge reconfiguration work and the engineering fees involved might have been wasted if the F&S Houseboat suggestion of constructing an entirely new floating pump platform is accepted by the board. Did our Operations Superintendent meet with a representative of F&S Houseboats on May 17, 2018 at the barge site? Is there an F&S Houseboats local branch in Snelling? Our Community Services District GM has provided much incorrect information to the public at monthly board meetings since his return in October 2014 (where he started his infamous water career 1994-1997) and failing to locate a local F&S Houseboat fabricator in Snelling CA was of concern. Just wanted to verify the above information since it was only received today (Saturday) with the board meeting being held on Monday at 1300hrs – not providing sufficient time to verify the information during normal business hours. Sure would appreciate a response as soon as possible on Monday morning. Thank you, Lew Richardson, resident customer and former 4 year term director on the LDPCSD board.
????
(Please do not misunderstand my concern, I have no doubt the company listed on the internet is a legitimate and professional outfit which does great work….. it is what KAMPA does that is disconcerting.)
Yes, perhaps a simple “location mistake” once again. Speaking of mistakes vs deception…. check out the ELECTION RESOLUTION on page 49 of your agenda packet:
The resolution states in the third citation:
“WHEREAS, the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District Board of Directors hereby certifies that there have been no changes to the boundaries of the Lake Don Pedro Community Services District since the last election held within the District. The map previously submitted to Mariposa County in 2008 is certified by the District to be true and correct.”
FIRST PART: The Board certifies there have been no boundary changes since last election.
The last election actually held was in November 2016 right? (others were appointments) yet the same Directors: Danny Johnson, Emery Ross, Dan Hankemeier, and Russ Warren all served on the board in 2015 as well. So, theoretically, boundary changes could have taken place prior to 2016 when 4 of the 5 current directors were also serving on the board. RECALL the State Water Board Notice of Violation indicated another OUTSIDE POU PROPERTY was provided service in 2016, as well as identifying several other “non compliance reporting” properties.
SECOND MORE IMPORTANT PART : Map submitted to Mariposa County in 2008 “is certified by the District to be true and correct”.
And who speaks for the District? Anyone care to take a guess?
CORRECT! PETE KAMPA.
I believe this is an essentially incorrect statement and intended to mislead while concealing a relevant fact that can easily be ascertained.
(NOTE: the 2008 LAFCO MSR (Municipal Service Review) pamphlet illustrates the LAKE SHORE RANCH as being within the SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (SOI) and not within the district boundary yet in May 2014 was changed to being within District Boundaries after consultation with LDPCSD officials.)
In other words, understand that directors are again being asked to approve two resolutions based on a “true and correct map” statement by PETE KAMPA although the map referenced is not attached to the resolution for inspection, review, acknowledgement and/or questioning.
RECALL theSTATE WATER BOARD NOTICE OF WATER RIGHT VIOLATION POINTED OUT THAT OUR VARIOUS CSD MAPS ARE CONTRADICTORY to the legal POU of the subdivision which makes any approval of this resolution rather meaningless without knowledge of WHICH MAP is referenced as being a “true and correct” map on file since 2008.
OBVIOUSLY any legitimate challenge and/or identification of potential misstatements is impossible without viewing the map.
SIMPLE QUESTION: IS THIS “true and correct” map of the district service boundary that Kampa refers to currently displayed on the LDPCSD website?
WHICH MAP IS KAMPA REFERRING TO IN THIS RESOLUTION (and the one for TUOLUMNE COUNTY)?
How could each director charged with voting on this matter possibly know which map was filed with the two Counties back in 2008 and planned to be used once again for this 2018 election ten years later?
Kampa wasn’t here in 2008 yet states the map is “TRUE AND CORRECT” indicating he has researched the matter in some way, why not share this information with the board members and public if truly legitimate?
Better yet, how about a short recess during Monday’s meeting while the author of this resolution,
who is “DISTRICT CERTIFYING” to the MARIPOSA and TUOLUMNE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and their respective COUNTY ELECTION OFFICIALS that it is a “TRUE AND CORRECT MAP”,
obtains a copy for board and public review and discussion PRIOR TO THE BOARD BLINDLY APPROVING YET ANOTHER KAMPA RESOLUTION WITHOUT VERIFICATION OF THE STATED FACTS?
Hints for directors trying to figure out which map is to be used:
Was the 900ac proposed residential subdivision of the LAKE SHORE RANCH across the street included in that map?
How could district boundaries be the same considering the fact that in MAY- JUNE 2014 LAFCO updated their files with a new map including a 900ac proposed residential development on the LAKE SHORE RANCH as now WITHIN THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY?
This annexation into the district apparently occurred in 1995 during Pete Kampa’s first tour of employment with the LDPCSDyet has actively been kept a secret from the public for over 20 years until the MARIPOSA COUNTY LAFCO map change which occurred only a few months prior to Pete Kampa’s return to the LDPCSD.
Why has PETE KAMPA refused to acknowledge a legitimate fact (if it is a fact) that this large annexation took place while he was employed here the first time? Why actively conceal the information?
LAFCO had previously plotted, published and relied on a map which excluded the LAKE SHORE RANCH property as illustrated in their municipal service review booklet of 2008. (BELOW)
(Come to think of it……how were ANY PROPERTIES LEGALLY ANNEXED INTO THE LDPCSD WITHOUT A Municipal Service Review Report?)
BELOW IS THE MAP PETE KAMPA HAS DISPLAYED ON THE LDPCSD WEBSITE DESPITE CHALLENGES REGARDING OUR BOUNDARY. NOTICE LAKE SHORE RANCH IS ILLUSTRATED AS BEING IN THE SOI (SPHERE OF INFLUENCE) ie,
INSIDE SOI SHADED BOUNDARY LINE AND OUTSIDE DISTRICT BOUNDARY SOLID BLACK LINE.
YET BELOW IS THE MAP KAMPA USED WITH GRANT FUNDING ACTIVITIES THAT WAS EVIDENTLY PRODUCED BY HIS CONTRACTOR KENNEDY JENKS – NOTICE THAT LAKE SHORE RANCH HAS NOW BEEN ADDED TO THE SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY.
and another “KAMPA MAP” used in GRANT FUNDING
QUESTION:
HOW CAN PETE KAMPA ASSERT IN THESE TWO RESOLUTIONS THERE HAVE BEEN NO BOUNDARY CHANGES, MUCH LESS THAT THE MAP IS “TRUE AND CORRECT” SINCE 2008, WITHOUT IDENTIFYING WHICH MAP HE IS REFERRING?
PETE KAMPA IS A MASTER OF DECEPTION –
JUST WHAT THE 2014 HIRING BOARD DESIRED.
Why, WAS I, AS A SITTING DIRECTOR ON THE BOARD, PROHIBITED from attending that LAFCO/LDPCSD “boundary map change meeting” WHILE AN OUTSIDE POU COMMERCIAL CATTLE RANCHER
(with an undocumented “private water line” w/o utility easements feeding other outside POU ranches and who has been watering cattle with a “liberated meter” and chlorinated water clearly intended for domestic residential HUMAN CONSUMPTION for over 20 years),
WAS ALLOWED TO ATTEND?
BECAUSE I WOULD HAVE CHALLENGED THAT ACTIVITY THEN AS I HAVE EVER SINCE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS “FAKE MAP” DECEPTION.
Some collaboration huh?
“All you foxes come on over to MARIPOSA LAFCO and explain to us how and where to safely coop these hens!”
(Appears to be a coordinated secret effort to get their stories straight in further deception of the public!)
not so lol
IS LAKE SHORE RANCH THE PROPERTY THAT WAS PROVIDED NEW WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE POU IN 2016 according to the STATE WATER BOARD NOTICE OF VIOLATION ?
Recall there were two attempts to RESCIND RESOLUTION 2013-4 (Prohibition of further OUTSIDE POU service requiring GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION)?
First attempt: June 15, 2015:
AGENDA ITEM 5. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS:
h. Approval of a Resolution rescinding Resolution 2013-4 regarding the prohibition of committing water supply outside the Merced Irrigation District’s Lake McClure water supply place of use
(Yet page 97 where the resolution should have been was blank, with the exception of the following: “Approved 7/15/2013”)
SECOND ATTEMPT: February 16, 2016:
SO, failing to legal rescind RESOLUTION 2013-4……DID KAMPA JUST QUIETLY SLIP WATER SERVICE TO HIS SLUMBERING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ACROSS THE STREET BECAUSE HE KNEW IT HAD BEEN ANNEXED BY LAFCO IN 1995? TRUE, STILL OUTSIDE POU AND REQUIRING GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION, BUT HEY! KAMPA NOW HAD THE GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION – COMPLIMENTS OF WELL INTENDED STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT MONEY FOR ASSISTANCE TO LEGAL CUSTOMERS DURING AN EMERGENCY DROUGHT!
(Remember when Merced Falls Road was closed and the LDPCSD July board meeting was held at the high school while a trench was cut through the asphalt towards the LAKE SHORE RANCH property? What was the purpose of that roadway trench construction and pipe extension? Was a permit from the county obtained for that roadwork or was it just quickly done without the necessary approvals like the Ranchito Well in 1993 and Kampa’s new recent Ranchito Well #2? KAMPA apparently just does what he wants while MR WECs continues to pay the bills!)
SOME QUICK NOTES ON KAMPA’s failed RESCISSION:
“Water from sources other than Lake McClure” … notice KAMPA cannot bring himself to use the term GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION! (Those groundwater wells were intended for emergency drought use you recall.)
INCORRECT: THE FIRST RANCHITO WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1993, not 1992 – and then required permits were supposedly “lost” by the County of Mariposa somehow!
Ranchito Drive well #1 obviously was not producing water continuously for OUTSIDE POU PROPERTY SUBSTITUTION since there were STATE WATER BOARD confirmed violations for such noted in the 2017 NOTICE OF VIOLATION along with the discovery of several other properties not included in the mandatory monthly reporting to the Merced Irrigation District of which KAMPA was most surely aware already.
INCORRECT: NOT all properties outside the POU pay availability fees yet can still vote in district elections assuring dysfunction for our district board for many years to come. Non-stakeholders determining elections? It is called Gerrymandering! And how do you spell KAMPA’s theory that outside POU properties are entitled to groundwater substitution?
Only makes an ASS (out of) U (and) ME!
ASSUME all you want you disingenuous profit driven scammer.
INCORRECT: THE GROUNDWATER WELLScannot support the WATER DEMAND FOR MERCED RIVER WATER ENTITLED CUSTOMERS OF THE LAKE DON PEDRO SUBDIVISION much less the thousand or so acres annexed into the district by the LAFCOs (Local Agency Formation Commissions) of Tuolumne County and Mariposa County some of which propose large residential subdivisions!
MORE ABSOLUTE KAMPA-KRAPPA!
YUP, A REAL NICE GUY.
Why were different POU/SOI maps with larger service areas provided to grant funding entities for groundwater wells yet more appropriately reduced service area maps posted on the website for public review? (Because legal customers are treated as mushrooms! Kept in dark and fed KRAPPA!)
Why did LAFCO request reaffirmation by the LDPCSD of Resolution 90-2 in 1993 regarding the LAKE SHORE RANCH annexation?
Why is this information missing from LDPCSD records?
Why would LAFCO advise no public notification was necessary to those legal customers in the subdivision effected by this annexation?
AGAIN, how can the Commission state all oral and written comments to updates were heard when I was specifically excluded from that meeting even though I had studied this map situation for years and was quite vocal about the contradictory information?
WHY WOULD MARIPOSA LAFCO RELY ON A SUBORDINATE DISTRICT TO DETERMINE WHAT BOUNDARIES EXIST FOR THAT SUBORDINATE SPECIAL DISTRICT WHEN ONLY LAFCO CAN MAKE SUCH BOUNDARY CHANGES?
There is an “i” in PUBLIC also.
AS in
“I”
DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING KAMPA DOES FOR THIS PUBLIC AGENCY.
See what happens when I start backing up a bunch of LDPCSD information?
It’s like passing by an accident scene on the highway –
The following is an email response from Wes Barton to LAKE DON PEDRO CSD Board President Danny Johnson. Johnson had suggested at that last SPECIAL MEETING (Wednesday, January 17th, 2018) that Wes put his observations, comments and questions in writing and forward them to President Johnson. You will recall many of Mr. Barton’s questions have gone unanswered for over a year as documented in meeting recordings posted on this website.
“Around, around the agenda GO ROUND
As customers chase the GM
The GM stops and laughingly says
HA! We don’t have to answer!”
When General Manager/Board Treasurer Pete Kampa states he is confused about the legitimate WATER LICENSE 11395 PLACE OF USE RESTRICTIONS for Merced River water in the Lake Don Pedro area I become rather agitated because I have researched the matter extensively and the statement is just plain not truthful. PETE KAMPA has over twenty years experience with such water issues – notably including four years of “hands on” experience in setting up these OUTSIDE POU ANNEXATIONS to the Lake Don Pedro CSD which he knew twenty years ago would require GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION in the future and was the reason for his UNETHICAL APPOINTMENT RETURN to the LDPCSD in October 2014.
Kampa has laughingly dismissed this (reason for his return) as a wild conspiracy theory while simultaneously refusing to answer legitimate questions as to his activities since 2014 regarding the SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM for land developers outside the WL POU.
The plan was to DIVERT AND USE STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS
(INTENDED TO DEVELOP GROUNDWATER WELLS FOR EMERGENCY DROUGHT USE FOR EXISTING CONSUMERS),
TO FURTHER EXPAND A SPECIAL BENEFIT GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION SERVICE FOR LAND DEVELOPERS OUTSIDE THE MERCED RIVER WATER PERMITTED PLACE OF USE.
{Like the “slumbering annexation” for a proposed 900 acre residential subdivision adjacent to the LDP subdivision that was LAFCO approved in 1995 but only acknowledged a few months before PETE KAMPA returned to the LDPCSD?}
The <MR WECs> of the Lake Don Pedro subdivision have essentially been forced to fund this SPECIAL GROUNDWATER SUBSTITUTION BENEFIT for decades.
[October 2017, lakedonpedro.org file photo: PETE KAMPA
using his newly acquired $35,000 DIGITAL MAPPING PROJECT (approved by the Board of Directors
despite public warnings of likely potential misuse by KAMPA)
TO CHANGE theSTATE RECOGNIZED PLACE OF USE BOUNDARY
FOR MERCED RIVER WATER per WL11395]
However, the only confusion that appears to have existed, and still does, is why PETE KAMPA refused, and still refuses to acknowledge the clear and decades old legitimate 11395 water use restrictionswhile ONCE AGAIN ACTIVELY VIOLATING THEM – EVEN AFTER A NOTICE OF SIMILAR VIOLATIONS FROM THE STATE WATER BOARD in September of 2017!
(lakedonpedro.org file photo)
{OR IS THE LDPCSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KNOWINGLY ASSISTING PETE KAMPA WITH
THIS CONTINUING 3+ YEARS OF DECEPTION?}
As mentioned before, I am not much of a financial person and am quite satisfied when my bills are paid and the check book balances, however, there are some BASIC financial matters that do not require extensive education or experience to understand that something is very wrong and I believe Wes Barton has discovered something OUTRAGEOUSLY SIGNIFICANT to Kampa’s continued and UNWARRANTED COMPLAINTS against the USDA and his “stated” CONFUSION as to why the USDA as failed to reimburse the LDPCSD for it’s expenses.
Let’s start with a few basic definitions.
USDA: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
G/L : GENERAL LEDGER: the principal and controlling ledger of a business enterprise containing individual or controlling accounts for all assets, liabilities, net worth items, revenue, and expenses.
REIMBURSE:
1 : to pay back to someone : repay, reimburse travel expenses 2: to make restoration or payment of an equivalent to reimburse him for his traveling expenses
FRAUD: 1 a : deceit, trickery; specifically : intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right/ was accused of credit card fraud/ : an act of deceiving or misrepresenting :trick /automobile insurance frauds/ 2 a : a person who is not what he or she pretends to be : impostor – He claimed to be a licensed psychologist, but he turned out to be a fraud. Also one who defrauds : cheat/ b : one that is not what it seems or is represented to be/ The UFO picture was proved to be a fraud.
CONSPIRACY: a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal: the act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal
$ ? $ ? $ ? $ ? $ ? $ ? $ ? $
Danny,
Sorry for not replying to your request to explain my question concerning “request for money from USDA when
I didn’t believe we have paid the vendor thus how could CSD be reimbursed”. I waited until I had G/L to check
A couple of points that I was sure were not pertinent but wanted to verify. Secondly, I’ll stay away from most
Numbers, but can support all in detail (from CSD records).
Brief history and meeting (Jan 17, 2018) discussion:
GM Kampa (GM) indicated “confusion” as to why USDA had not paid apx $324k requested in Nov., 2017, after
Advising CSD Board final review/approval of funding was planned for 7/19/2017 (original req #1 form @$210k
Was presented to Board at that Time). [To my knowledge, no later info as to any reason to believe there was
Any delay in USDA approval; as well as GM continued the process and applicable communication for funding.]
Also during the July meeting, GM requested an additional funding to Kennedy Jenkins for $60k and that CSD
Would then owe KJ apx $70k, $59.9 for services not originally budgeted. From June 30, 2017 thru Dec 2017,
GM reports only $1129 spent (or accrued) per G/L on well projects.
12/14/2017 (Nov business), GM reported a “revised” USDA funding request #1 for $324.6k. This report
Appears to show the increased $114k ($324k-$210k) made up of old cost before June 30, 2017, of apx
$54k (nearly all NJ & sons and K J costs) and about $59k for KJ (dated Aug thru Nov 2017 include a noted
Cost of $1.7k for the “future”). GM booked this request as a billing and documented in the G/L & A/R.
Basis of my question, “why surprise no reimburse” or even “checks in the mail”:
If Grants “reimburse” only cash expenditures. CSD G/L shows apx $1k cost paid/accrued since June thru
Dec 2017. Revised Request #1 shows $59k spent since June 2017 but CSD G/L denies this expenditure.
GM requested $60k to be paid (budget) to KJ to obtain the reimbursement from USDA. Simply put,
I wouldn’t expect USDA to reimburse if I had not paid so why would USDA pay CSD if they hadn’t paid.
[Since cash, other checks and balances would probably catch G/L issues/errors on these transactions if paid.]
I don’t like “gotcha’s”, either. I reject that this is an unknowable to CSD, known only by me. However, if one
Wants to “tag” this as a “gotcha” then it must be obvious CSD’s leadership and management is in “deep
Do-do” and need to look close at their organization and selves at least as far as “financial controls”.
When I wrote last year (yesterday – Part 5 of that December 14, 2017 “totally special” Special Meeting – lol) that I believed the LAKE SHORE RANCHLAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission) approved annexationinto the Lake Don Pedro CSD back in 1995 (during PETE KAMPA’s first employment tour with our district, 1994-1997) was split between both TOULUMNE and MARIPOSA COUNTY, I was writing from recall and didn’t have the extra time necessary to research or post the information, so figured I would do a quick update post with the LAFCo map used in the 1995 approval. Both with and with out my traditional blah, blah, blah written comments!
The point I was trying to make was, or rather the question I was raising, is PETE KAMPA once again attempting to funnel PUBLIC RESOURCES THROUGH THIS TUOLUMNE COUNTY MULTI JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN in preparation for ONCE AGAIN using the GUISE OF “SECURING EMERGENCY GROUNDWATER IN CASE OF DROUGHT”, when in actuality like his first EMERGENCY GROUND WELLS, is only continuing his original goal of providing an“ALTERNATE SOURCE” GROUNDWATER SUPPLY to substitute the MERCED RIVER WATER THAT ALREADY DOES, AND WILL CONTINUE TO
ILLEGALLY LEAVE THE
LAKE DON PEDRO
SUBDIVISION
to serve the thousands of acres of LAFCo annexed property
KAMPA worked to include twenty years ago?
A district incidentally, which has OPERATED FOR NEAR FORTY YEARS UNDER THAT WATER LICENSE!
WHY IS THERE NO MENTION OF THIS STATE WATER LICENSE RESTRICTION ANYWHERE IN THIS MASSIVE MULTI JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN?
Is this failure to mention such a monumental variable to water service in the LAKE DON PEDRO AREA only preparing for some other bullshit Kampa defense of “plausible deniability” when public funds are again obtained through misrepresentation and ultimately misappropriated to KAMPA’s HIDDEN AGENDA FOR ANNEXED PROPERTY SUBSTITUTED GROUND WATER SERVICE CONTINUING TO PAID FOR BY THE 99% OF INNOCENT MR WECs* of the subdivision?
I was curious as to why this sudden hurried push by KAMPA for our district’s involvement with this TUOLUMNE COUNTY “HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN” until recalling Kampa’s LAKE SHORE RANCH project, aka, the “SLUMBERING PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION from 1995” (across from the LDPCSD treatment plant) — had land in TUOLUMNE COUNTY also which might require public funds from that county for development of ground wells for MERCED RIVER WATER SUBSTITUTION for those private land developers outside the WATER LICENSE PLACE OF USE on that side of the county line.
Only those intimately involved (perpetrators and beneficiaries) would know since PETE KAMPA has clamped down on public information even more since his “emergency return” in October 2014 to remedy this OUTSIDE POU CONTINUING FRAUD AGAINST MR WECs.